I still haven't gotten any clarification and don't see a correction from either @CNN or @brikeilarcnn. Did some number crunching. Here's another interesting graph.
3/ I'm happy to share my calculations if anyone wants to double check them, as I don't quite have the staff or budget of say @cnn or @brikeilarcnn to double check to make sure I don't make a mistake, say by
4/ Showing a graphic that shows half-a-million aliens returned to country of origin in June alone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trikafta mini-update: DS has been on Trikafta for just about 2 months. Before his lungs have been so healthy (thank you God), he hasn't noticed any real changes. We'll know more when he does his annual Xray if the minimal lung inflamation has decreased & re nasal polyps & 1
2/ whether he still colonizes staph, which he has since 2 weeks old. BUT the huge yippee is his GI issues which have always been the worst--worst his CF doctor has seen. Since he was ~1 year horrible problems, daily
3/ stomach pain w/ me basically rocking him all day other than meals & treatments, one obstruction hospitalization. Things stable for about 4 years after we found solution which requires 6 full doses of Miralax per day, plus 2 shots of milk of mag per day & senna ~3 per week.
6/ On the other hand, if I include Feb, Mar, Apr, May, and June AND the total of those months the graph looks like this:
7/ But note, a "total" column appears AND the total for Title 8 skyrockets too. At first I thought this was just some interns silly mistake, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how @CNN and @brikeilarcnn could accidently create the graph they did.
8/8 They've been ignoring the question so far, so maybe you all can ask them to provide the data they used to create this graph: Or maybe @brianstelter can help me out here?
2/ Abbott and states likely can do some things, but just not the E.O. I also agree w/ points re fed government failing. But bottom line, as a matter of constitutional law, thefederalist.com/2021/08/04/tex…
3/ he is wrong. Suprmacy Clause preempts THIS E.O. It's not even a close question. And you'll note, other than conclusory statements, there is no discussion of legal standards or analysis in his piece. Rather than fight over this, which court has already stayed, lets:
So, in reading some of briefing in Dobbs, something strikes me. The Court will have to confront actual science this time that establishes human life already exists pre-viability. Court can lie, pretend it doesn't matter to "avoid question," or accept reality. 1/
2/ If Court does #3, challenge for Court will be to access (invent) constitutional principle re when state can allow or disallow destruction of human life. But that is a moral or philosophical question that justices neither can nor should answer.
3/ And if Court attempts to "punt," saying since different moral/philosophical beliefs on this question so we must defer to moms' view, the Court IS deciding what moral/philosophical position wins.
I'm digging more into impact of Biden Administration's failure to fully enforce Title 42 rule on border and this is an amazing tidbit. (March Order is 2020 March order by Trump Administration precluding entry/mandating quick removal.).
2/ But while Biden Administration claims Title 42 is necessary for public health reasons, it is doing its utmost to not use the authority to remove: