Here at the Legislative Office Building waiting for the 3:30pm joint House and Senate Redistricting Committee to get started. Today they're supposed to discuss these proposed criteria: ncleg.gov/documentsites/…
Sen. Daniel is presiding. He says there will be 60 speaking slots tomorrow morning during the two hour hearing starting at 8:30am. We still have gotten no idea how people can sign up to speak.
This is what we heard off hand but there's been no official announcement:
We were also told that a lot of people signed up already. How they signed up to speak when I, who follow this process as closely as anyone, have no idea how to sign up - well I'll leave that to your imagination #ncpol #corruptbullshitasusual
Sen. Newton is reading out the criteria I linked in the first tweet. If you want to know more join our redistricting criteria training tonight: mobilize.us/allontheline/e…
One criterion I do want to draw your attention to is this
They thought they would be cute and call what is obviously Incumbent Protection something else - "member residence"
Also, if you genuinely believe these people are not using political data behind the scenes to draw these maps I have a canal in Panama to sell you
Sen. Marcus brings up that the language around VTD and municipal splits is vague as to when that is permiseible
As you can see this only says VTDs "should be split only when necessary" doesn't say when it's necessary. Newton says that it has no legal import 🤯
Similarly with municipal boundaries it just says that they may consider municipal boundaries which means absolutely nothing.
These criteria aren't criteria at all. They're anti-criteria, so purposefully vague as to allow legislators to do anything that want
The committee leadership are trying to explain that the criteria do mean something, of course, they just didn't want to write it down 🙄
Sen. Clark is asking about how county clusters will be selected since this wasn't an issue in 2019 bc 2011 clusters were used.
Sen. Daniel says that he doesn't think the same county clusters were used bc he's served in different districts over the past decade showing he understands exactly ZERO about what county clusters actually are.
This is how you know all the real work is being done by other people, consultants and party operatives, because this kind of ignorance is so apparent.
And while I was composing that little rant the meeting ended 😅

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lekha Shupeck

Lekha Shupeck Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lekhashupeck

10 Aug
Yesterday, before the 3:30pm Redistricting Committee meeting we were told by NCGA staff that "a lot of people" were already signed up to speak this morning at the public hearing on criteria.

How is this possible if the sign up firm didn't go public until after 4pm? #ncpol
The obvious implication is that Republican leadership of the committee had released this information to selected people well before it came public, effectively filling up most if not all of the 60 speaking slots with their ideological compatriots.
This is further substantiated by the fact that we were also told by staff that it was Sen. Paul Newton (co-Chair of the committee) whose legislative assistant was the one who collected the names of speakers before the public sign up was released.
Read 10 tweets
24 Oct 19
Ran over to Campbell Law School just in time for the discussion on the plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction request in the Congressional partisan gerrymandering case #ncpol #NCGA
One thing that's clear from the plaintiffs opening statement - this case is, if anything, *stronger* than the one against the legislative districts
.@mel_bough is actually live tweeting this. I'll probably just be making comments here and there
Read 25 tweets
7 Sep 19
The bill they're talking about here, #H140, that is starting to lose Democratic support, is the same one that the legislative defendants just cited Art Pope as having endorsed when offering him as a gerrymandering referee.
If you don't know who Art Pope is, he's the North Carolina Republican mega-donor behind the GOP REDMAP effort that led to maps that have been found to be both partisan *and* racially gerrymandered by multiple courts.
Now, I wouldn't trust any redistricting reform bill that Art Pope endorsed. As the Common Cause trial showed, #NCGA Republican leadership has acted in bad faith at every turn on this issue. Even now in offering Pope as "referee" they're basically trolling the court.
Read 33 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(