There has been a lot of noise about the proportion of COVID cases, hospitalizations and even deaths that occur among vaccinated people. This is misleading. In this working paper we show how getting vaxxed improves your chances using relative risk cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/upl… 1/x
This is the formula relating relative risk of an outcome for unvaxxed vs vaxxed people to efficacy. It tells you how many more time likely an unvaxxed person is to die, be hospitalized etc, relative to a vaxxed person 2/x
Sorry for big table, but the headline finding is that unvaxxed persons were between 5 and 133 times *more likely to be hospitalized* and between 9 and 141 *more likely to die* in comparison with fully vaxxed 3/x
This is consistent with VE vs hospitalization of 80-99% and vs death of 89-99%. 4/x
This is based on data from several states. This is Arkansas 1/1/21 to 7/29/21. Each square represents 200 people. over this period 68 fully vaxxed sadly died from covid. The corresponding number for the not fully vaxxed was 2543 5/x
It’s a point I’ve made before… 6/x
there are a lot of reasons for the wide ranges in the estimates, including age structure (of states and those vaccinated). But the facts remain that covid is a serious infection, and #vaccineswork. Thx to the excellent Jarvis Chen, @_christiantesta and Nancy Krieger.
finally, a comparison, from the working paper. The vaccine is like a seatbelt, in fact it is better than a seatbelt. 8 (I think?)/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Hanage

Bill Hanage Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillHanage

4 Jul
This from @devisridhar is the sort of grown up, admitting uncertainty, but science led take that’s exactly what you want in a pandemic. I have some comments specifically about the uk’s attitude to transmission in schools 1/? theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
The risk has literally evolved over the last 18 months. The founder virus was poor at infecting kids, especially younger ones (there has always been a big difference between the under tens and older) 2/?
I’ve heard smart people I trust say that the R in schools with the founder virus was below 1. That seems very plausible for that virus and the under 10s, less so for older age groups. Both are complicated by the fact that kids are less likely to have symptoms 3/?
Read 14 tweets
10 Jun
The pandemic has been especially dangerous in nursing homes, and many handled it badly (yes @andrewcuomo that includes you). This from the U.K. includes some retrofitting of what we did and didn’t know, and what experts would have advised 1/n theguardian.com/society/2021/j…
Starting point is that we have known a long time that outbreaks of respiratory infections are deadly in nursing homes. I and many others have written about that in the past. The danger was expected but not prepared for 2/n
This from @DHSCgovuk is shameful. I was watching the evidence at the time. I and most of my colleagues thought some asymptomatic/presymptomatic transmission was likely. This misrepresents the state of the science at that time, and what about the precautionary principle? 3/n
Read 6 tweets
9 Jun
The US has (overall) pretty good levels of vaccination by now and this is excellent and *everyone* involved deserves credit - but the virus is not gone and it is wrong to pretend that it is (teeny slightly ranty thread)
First we have a new variant on the scene (Delta) which is pretty unambiguously worse than its predecessors. Already about 6% of cases and climbing
Then there are a bunch of states in the south that experienced a surged over the summer last year. Some of them are mooting shifting to once a week reporting, which is not a good idea coronavirus.jhu.edu/pandemic-data-…
Read 9 tweets
4 Jun
So growth rate and R number in the UK now over 1. Unsurprisingly given that Delta variant now dominant. A short thread on the next few weeks there, which will be (sorry) big on uncertainty gov.uk/guidance/the-r… 1/n
That's quite a large increase. The caveat of course is that it is from a *very* low base indeed. And cases will not necessarily translate into severe illness, especially in vaccinated people 2/n
Unfortunately these too are up, from a low baseline. This should be treated with caution because when numbers are this low they can be impacted by unusual events like clusters of infection in vulnerable populations - although you'd hope such folks were vaccinated 3/n
Read 9 tweets
3 Jun
Have digested the latest excellent technical briefing from @PHE_uk on variants and Delta (the variant formerly known as B.1.617.2) in particular. as ever, all findings are context dependent and should be interpreted with care, but this is serious and deserves a wide audience 1/?
First, read all about it yourself (don't take my word for it!). Briefing here assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… and Risk Assessment assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 2/?
This is from the risk assessment. Yes there is a lot of red. There is now very good evidence of increased transmissibility (will come back to that) compared with Alpha/B.1.1.7 (already quite transmissible). This is important. There is also... 3/?
Read 18 tweets
2 Jun
I read this article this morning and it made me uneasy, I've just figured out why. Not linking deliberately although easy enough to find if you really want to 1/n
The article admits that a definitive answer on the origins of the pandemic is probably never going to be available (I agree), and then proceeds as if it were. This is silly 2/n
If there will never be a definitive answer to the question, why act like there will be? In its absence people will pick sides based on pre-existing positions rather than accepting uncertainty. And the thing is we'll be better off in the future accepting that uncertainty 3/n
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(