If you know Germany you know that it's pretty common, almost 'common sense', to claim that Germany is doing better than other countries re: climate & environment.
Journalist here calls it an "undisputed climate leader"
I use data for 2019, and not relative reduction data because if:
- your emissions were very high
- you have reduced them more than others (in relative terms)
- but they're still higher than others in absolute terms
to me you're not a *leader*, you're just converging
Total emissions (including aviation): higher in Germany than in all other countries considered here except Poland.
Look at the difference with France!
Now sector by sector.
ENERGY INDUSTRIES: again, second behind Poland. And look at the difference with France.
IRON AND STEEL
Germany has by far the highest emissions of all countries considered. More than twice their values.
TRANSPORT
Here the differences between countries are less pronounced (everyone sucks at transport & climate) but Germany still wins. As in: highest per capita emissions of the bunch.
OTHER (ENERGY) SECTORS (commercial/institutional, residential, agricultural/forestry/fishing. Highest emissions for Germany.
'OTHER OTHER' (ENERGY) SECTORS
Germany is middle of the pack
INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE
Germany has the highest emissions per capita.
AGRICULTURE
Germany is middle of the pack - France does much worse.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
That's where Germany does much better than other countries - half or less than half their emissions.
So to sum up:
- Germany has higher total emissions per capita than other major European countries
- in 4 sectors, it's got the highest emissions
- it's got the lowest emissions in just 1 sector (waste management)
So Germany be proud of your waste management (and other things you've done right) but don't let it go to your head.
The case for Germany being a "climate leader" *on the whole* is weak at best.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Specifically, the discourses here are no. 5 "All talk, little action" (AKA targetism), drawing attention (often presumed) achievements relative to other countries (rather than relative to the goal) and to future targets (rather than concrete achievements)
...and no. 3 "the free rider excuse", hinting that other countries are not willing to do their bit (so why should we try *even harder*)?
- or the day when German journalists will stop saying "we're *undisputed* climate *leaders*, but what can we do, we can't do everything *alone*!" (like here ⬇️)
"We've committed to stop bragging about our presumed superiority on environmental matters by 2050"
Anyway I'm sure that day will become before the phaseout of combustion engine vehicle sales because... the German government is adamantly refusing to set a date for that
#ClimateTwitter we need to talk about percentages and denominators.
Depending on what you divide it by, any measure bringing about carbon emission reductions can be made to look ridiculously small, or huge.
Good to be aware of these things [THREAD]
For illustrative purposes, let's take this measure I've been tweeting about lately: introducing a generalised 130km/h motorway speed limit in Germany (where there isn't any) would cut annual emissions by 1.9MTCO2e.
Opponents of #tempolimit in Germany argue that the resulting emission savings (2MTCO2e) are too small to matter.
In fact, they would help deliver *almost half* of the transport emission reductions (-5MTCO2e) promised in the government own emission budget for *this year*