I enjoy seeing all the newly woke medical professionals on Linkedin speaking out against the Covid psyop, but what's sad (and kind of funny too) is the extent to which they still have faith in elections and the political process.
No we cannot "vote" out the politicians in order to terminate the psyop. The psyop will only end when the existing political structure is illegitimated.
Obvious to me but totally obscure to those who have no earthly idea when it comes to the political/legal system and the extent to which it is fueled by fake elections and attendant propaganda.
Just goes to show that narrow focus on your own professional concerns is never a good thing in the aggregate.
I would suggest that the new "out in the open" strategy is a function of the implementation and development of the "information society," a society that has made the globalists rich beyond their wildest dreams but ...
at the same time has made it impossible to obscure certain facts from the population at large.
Censorship strategies can never have the potent, pervasive effect they had in past eras (e.g., the Inquisition) because the Information Society, and especially the Internet, inherently permits data an escape route no matter how dedicated the censorship efforts.
You are 100% correct. The Covid psyop will ultimately give way to a Secession psyop, which will ultimately give way to a Civil War psyop. All three are staged operations with the end result being the dismantling of the U.S. in favor of some "world government" structure.
Much like WW2 and its precursors were staged with the end goal of dismantling European states in favor of a bipolar/quasi-internationalist structure. The U.S.-dominated system no longer serves the interests of the Controllers.
So it is being dismantled through a series of operations. We can observe the operations and understand them, but we really do not have the agency to change course
I’ve got an open mind and I’ve got my interests and, you know, it’s very difficult to put everything into a particular order or a particular philosophy because, I think it’s a vast world out there, full of information, and I cannot pretend to have a handle on it all.
Particularly now, we’re at a very interesting moment in time where we’re all so dependent on technology and by design, also distracted by technology. And, distracted by easy access to endless entertainment - by meaningless things.
I don't think too many of us can accurately deduce what exactly is behind all of it, and I don't claim to know what we’re supposed to do about it.
San Francisco has six "safe sleeping villages", spending $18.2m for 260 tents for the homeless. The city's homelessness dept. is now asking for $15m a year for a similar # of tents ($57,000 per tent per year) - twice the median cost of a 1 BR apartment.
If you didn't come here today for a quick dopamine fix, I recommend that you take some time and read the article in full. As with all of John's articles, this one is full of pearls to contemplate and great quotes.
I'll share some of the quotes and a bit of John's writing here, as time permits but don't assume the selected tidbits do full justice.
"In his epilogue to Devils of Loudun, (Aldous) Huxley noted the seductive nature of group think, of what he called the collective alienation of herds.
I said they were Bohemian Grove members (that's not speculation)
As for the CIA?
CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb ran LSD experiments in Palo Alto that Ken Kesey + Robert Hunter took part in. Allen Ginsburg first took LSD via Gottlieb's massive stash ($240,000 worth in 1953 dollars)
This led to Robert Hunter turning on the Grateful Dead with Sidney Gottlieb’s CIA-funded acid.
The Dead's first show as the "Grateful Dead", and not the Warlocks, as 12/4/65 at the San Jose Acid Test. LSD didn't become illegal in CA until six months later.
I don't have time right now but most Deadheads know about Owsley Stanley's role with the Dead and LSD Bay Area counterculture. Also look up Stuart Brand's role.