The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has ruled in favour of six women who were harassed and abused during raids by the Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB), police and other law enforcement agents in April 2019.
The six women, through a team of lawyers comprising of Deji Ajare, Mojirayo Ogunlana-Nkanga, Bamidele Jacobs, Jennifer Ogbogu, Miriam Orika, Chigoziem Onugha, Martins Obono Augusta Yaakugh led by Sterling Law Centre, filed public interest suits seeking to enforce their…
…fundamental human rights to personal liberty and freedom of movement, right to personal dignity, freedom from torture, freedom of association and freedom from discrimination. The suits were filed with support from Lawyers Alert and the Open Society Initiative for West Africa.
After over two years of trial, Justice Evelyn Maha of the Federal High Court in her judgment on August 5th, 2021:
1.Held that the arrest of the applicants without cause, the beating, molestation and dehumanising treatment, the detention of the applicants and the barring of the applicants from accessing legal representation was a violation of the applicants’ rights as guaranteed under the…
…Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
2.Awarded between ₦2 million to ₦4 million in damages against The Abuja Environmental Protection Board, the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps, the Inspector General of Police and Inspector Thomas Nzemekwe AKA ‘Yellow’ in favour of the six applicants.
3.Held that the 6th respondent, the Abuja Environmental Protection Board, was presumptuous in its role and acted ultra vires, beyond its scope and powers regarding the raids.
4.Issued an injunction restraining the Police, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and other listed respondents from arresting women in such circumstances and in a manner that discriminates on the basis of gender.
About the Abuja Raids:
On April 26th, 2019, a mob of over 100 male state actors invaded clubs, hotels, supermarkets and other centres of business in Abuja to round up women under the guise of arresting sex workers.
It was alleged that the invasion was commissioned by Hajiya Safiya Umar, the Acting Secretary Social Development Secretariat of the FCT, a woman saddled with protecting persons within the FCT, particularly women and children.
This unfortunate event, a recurring decimal for women in the FCT, became known as the ‘Abuja Raids.’
These women, targeted because of their gender, suffered sexual violations, physical and mental torture while in detention at Utako Police Station.
Inspector Thomas Nzemeke, also known as ‘Yellow’, physically assaulted a mother of a two-month-old baby, a woman menstruating was denied access to sanitary towels, and the women were stashed in most unsanitary conditions.
They were denied bail and legal representation between the 26th and 29th of April 2019, infringing on their human rights.
In this vein, in line with the mandate of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), a Special Investigative Panel on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Nigeria on the incidents in Abuja and other parts of the country was constituted.
This judgement is significant as it asserts the human rights of every person against gender-based violence, especially by state actors, which is a persisting, well-documented fact.
The judgment regarding the discriminatory arrest of people based on their gender, particularly the arrest of women in the streets and other places, becomes a reference point for protecting women’s rights now and in the future.
According to Tony Ojukwu, Executive Secretary of the NHRC, ‘History has once more been made in Abuja in the landmark court judgements on the notorious raids of women and girls in the streets of Abuja by the Abuja Environmental Protection Board and other law enforcement agents.’…
…He highlighted that the landmark judgements have ‘vindicated the position of civil society groups and the Commission.’ He hoped that the judgement will serve as a wakeup call for law enforcement agents to desist from further inhuman raids and activities in such a way that…
…violates the human rights of citizens - as such will be resisted and challenged in the courts of the land.
Freedom of movement is guaranteed by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and can only be restricted in exceptional circumstances clearly defined by law.
The court’s declaration that the actions of the AEPB, was unlawful and had abrogated powers to itself and acted beyond its brief under its establishing Act is poignant.
Significantly, the court made an order of perpetual injunction against the AEPB and other respondents from further carrying out raids without an order of a court.
Similarly, Dr Ivana Radacic a member of the Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls welcomes the decision of the Federal Court.
Not only does the judgement recognise violations of the rights of the claimants and awards them the damages, it also prohibits the relevant enforcement authorities from arresting women in such circumstances and in the manner that discriminates on the basis of gender, thus…
…having a broad impact. The judgment represents an important step in challenging impunity for violations of the rights of sex workers, prevalent in many societies, and recognising discriminatory impact of criminalisation of prostitution on women.
The following were listed as respondents in this case:
1.The Minister of the FCT
2.Federal Capital Territory Administration
3.Federal Capital Development Agency
4.Hajiya Safiya Umar, Acting Secretary Social Development Secretariat of the FCT
5.Abuja Metropolitan Management Council
6.Abuja Environmental Protection Board
7.Hassan Abubakar H.O.D Abuja Environmental Protection Board
8.Eze Enya, Abuja Environmental Protection Board
9.Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corp
10.Inspector-General of Police
11.Attorney General of the Federation
12.Thomas Nzemekwe AKA ‘Yellow’
13.Idayat Akanni Olaide (Chief Magistrate 1)
This thread has been copied from a press release issued today by a coalition of 58 Abuja CSOs who came together to press for action following the 2019 raids.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When I say that there is an exclusive Nigerian identity fostered by the state, this is what it looks like. The national solidarity is engendered by patronage through oil blocks and monthly transfers. The average Nigerian lives at the margins of the state, participating by proxy.
When a part of Nigeria says they are marginalised, they often mean to say that the representives of their ethnic group through whom they broker their participation have been poorly treated by the patronage network.
In actual fact, all of Nigeria is marginalised, save the few.
The patronage system and all its corollaries including federal character, rotational presidency and fuel subsidy are designed to be exclusive and are built on the fantasy of trickle down economics.
State formation is a process. Every state in the world is somewhere along the continuum working its way forward or backward. This is where I think Nigeria is on the continuum. What do you think?
People take Stage 1 for granted because geographic homogeneity is a common assumption. But drawing boundaries can be a violent process. Who are you including that wants out? How do you deal with pockets of opposition that threaten the contiguousness of the map? Crush or resettle?
Stage 1 is usually driven by people with some sort of power. For instance, ISWAP has penetrated some territories in the Northeast. These territories were not ceded voluntarily by the previous occupiers. This is only the first step of state formation.
Be prepared to testify! I know from previous experience that young Nigerians are often averse to giving evidence in a judicial setting. There is nothing to be afraid of. Especially in this situation where your testimony will be supported by a mountain of video evidence #EndSWAT
Start organising all your videos and pictures. Upload them to a cloud or email to yourself. Make sure you they have geolocation. Create voice memos of your experiences to aid your memory. #EndSARS
Have evidence that establishes you were there at said time and evidence that supports what you witnessed. If fellow protesters are attacked and they acted in self defence, this evidence becomes even more useful. #EndSARS#EndSWAT
Without being presumptuous, may I make a proposal on how #EndSARS, #EndPoliceBrutality protest could continue and how progressive compromises on both sides are recognized without compromising momentum?:
I propose that as soon as the government arraigns those who shot at protesters in Surulere, Ogbomosho, Ile-Ife, Benin, Delta, Abuja etc, the protest stops blocking roads and volunteer marshalls assist commuters to pass while protesters retain their right to hold peaceful vigil.
If protesters are shot at anywhere, or there's evidence of betrayal of trust, the protest returns to its previous form until remediation takes place. This way, you provide incentive for compromise while demonstrating that our power is not without control.
I feel the need to remind us that our fight is not against individuals. It is against ideas, systems and cultures that have left us vulnerable and exalted themselves above our wellbeing. As such, winning the battle in the minds of Nigerians of all stature is paramount
It is high time we bin this narrative that people meeting with powerful people can sell your free will.
Meetings will happen. Backchanneling will happen. The way out of conflict is not victory, it is resolution.
If what they propose doesn't work, we move.
We are all Nigerian. Rich, not so rich, poor, powerful, not yet powerful, powerless, young, old etc. We will meet.
Nobody can shave your head via Zoom.
Policymaking is about consensus building. As such, people who haven't agreed yet can still talk.
When you are championing a movement against oppression, there's something I refer to as "The Moses Challenge". You have to look out for it and manage it. It's about balancing radicalism and gradualism.
Moses initially had an extreme reaction to seeing his people oppressed by the Egyptians. But he soon found out that his biggest challenge was getting the people he wanted to save to trust him. When he attempted to mediate a disagreement, he got hit with:
"Who made you a boss or judge over us? Are you planning to kill me like you killed the Egyptian?"
That accusation from his own kin shook Moses to his core. He had to restrategise.