During the height of the last Ice Age maximum, the world was only about 2C =colder= than it was in the 1950s. A difference of 2C is the difference between half of the world covered under a mile of ice, and the climate we all grew up in.
2/7
What 2C =warmer= means is hard to understand, but it will inevitably be a difference on the same scale.
Humans have never lived in that world. Much bigger deserts, immense coastal flooding, wars over fresh water, literally billions of displaced climate refugees.
3/7
Our civilization as it is cannot possibly handle it. This doesn't necessarily mean the collapse of civilization, but it does mean enormous changes we aren't prepared for and don't understand.
An increase of 2C is likely to happen by the end of THIS century, maybe by 2050.
4/7
A century is not a long time. I've lived well over half a century already.
Anyone born this year will be less than 80 years old in the year 2100. It's only a little farther away than we are from the Second World War.
5/7
Think about that, if the timescale of the coming climate catastrophe seems like a long time. It's not. YOU will live to see these catastrophes happen--if you live.
And if we don't act, you will live to see things far worse than 2C.
You really should be scared.
6/7
And remember who is standing in the way of doing anything. Republicans insist it isn't happening at all.
One way the most extreme cults keep members in line is by demanding they commit some horrible atrocity simply to join.
In the Mob, it's called "making your bones." You might have to kill someone, for instance. Historically, some cults have demanded crimes up to cannibalism.
1/6
These initiation rites are designed not only to prove your loyalty and to give the cult heavy blackmail to threaten you with, but also to rob you of your humanity. To later renounce the cult would mean you have to admit (even to yourself) that you did an inhuman thing.
2/6
Few people have the moral courage to admit their own such crimes were unjustifiable, and yet they did them anyway. The only alternative is to double-down and insist the acts were not crimes, but were necessary, and perhaps even served a Greater Good.
3/6
Let's all agree: Elon Musk, Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos are terrible people.
They had some big ideas. Whether you like those ideas or not, whether you like those guys or not, they're putting their ideas into practice.
Contrast this with Bernie Sanders.
1/12
I've been told Sanders has big ideas. Many people like his big ideas. He's been unable to put any of them into practice.
Don't tell me about how "the establishment" doesn't like his ideas. That didn't bother Musk, Bezos or Branson.
2/12
Again, Musk, Bezos and Branson all suck. We're agreed on that. I'm not defending them. I'm saying the excuses for why Sanders is completely ineffectual don't impress me.
Also, Sanders is as "establishment" as it is possible to be.
Scale comparison. On the left is Starship (earlier design--there's now another pair of fins toward the tip). Then Saturn V that brought three people at a time to the Moon. Then Statue of Liberty, then the Space Shuttle.
Starship will eventually seat over a hundred passengers.
Starship is designed to be reusable--not just the orbital part (as with the Shuttle), but even the booster stage, which will land back and the launch pad, be refueled and refurbished, and have another orbital stage set on top.
The orbital part is also, of course, reusable.
The Starship that was assembled yesterday is scheduled for a test flight within the next month or so. The orbital part will spashdown in the Pacific for this test run. The booster stage is meant to land on a SpaceX ocean barge. spacelaunchnow.me/launch/starshi…
I stood in a line today waiting to order fish and chips from a food truck in a parking lot at the local Office Depot. Two older ladies behind me discussed the hazy skies we're seeing from California wildfires.
Here's what we're up against.
1/8
They agreed the massive fires were due to politics.
People in California stupidly want keep things "natural." They should clear the brush out there that causes wildfires. It's not because of global warming. It's because their politics doesn't let them clear brush.
2/8
I stopped listening then.
Put aside that "wanting to keep it natural" couldn't cause this. Since "brush" is natural, it's been there tens of thousands of years. Brush volume hasn't changed. It couldn't suddenly cause unprecedentedly massive fires now.
Self indulgence. A thread full of total and unabased self indulgance.
How it started, how it's going.
Below is a picture I took about 4 years ago, of the spot where I intended then to build my house.
1/4
I worked with an architect to design a house for this spot, one that would fill our needs and also fit the landscape. I took a render from the architect and pasted it onto the view of the land.
2/4
This is what the house looks like today. I think we got pretty close.
I need to take this same picture on another day, when the sky isn't so hazy from faraway wildfires.