When I first started learning about this strange German word for slip box, I had no idea that it would bring me to where I am today.
ยน|โโ
And as I have scoured every resource I could about this simple, lightweight, note-taking system, I realized that I was fortunate enough to not have brought with me much baggage of old ways of working.
ยฒ|โโ
I say that with great admiration to those that have had strongly held ways of working that may have even been quite successful at organizing their thinking and writing.
ยณ|โโ
However, one of the first things I realized was that when many were approaching this task of learning about this way of workingโthey were often times too filled with past grievances to have any way of holding on to this new way of working.
โด|โโ
I mean how many of us can talk of our frustrations with Evernote this, Notion that, the list could go on.
โต|โโ
And I just couldn't bring myself to carrying around little index cards, no matter how thin, around with me, when I had a fully functioning and powerful computer with me at all times.
โถ|โโ
One of the biggest realizations that I had while on this journey was that nobody could actually teach me how to do it.
โธ|โโ
I don't mean the simple concepts and how to put them together, but rather how to actually implement it and habitualize this process over time.
That's one of the most difficult aspects of learning how to do anything.
โน|โโ
The mastery of anything requires a work ethic, but without being work while doing it.
If you can figure out that paradoxical idea, then you're on the road to happy destiny~
ยนโฐ|โโ
After I understood the concepts (h/t: Zettelkasten.de, Daniel Lรผdeke, Sรถnke Ahrens, and of course Luhmann's actual words) I started to see a hypothesis come to light.
ยนยน|โโ
If I could truly off-load my thinking to this communication partner then how much more would I be able to actually focus on the writing and thinking.
Could I really have something that I could depend on? Even after all the failed attempts?
ยนยฒ|โโ
I knew one thing had to be different this time. I had to trust in this system. And I use that word loosely, because the negative connotations are ever apparent.
ยนยณ|โโ
I had to trust that this wasn't going to fail me.
But how would I ever test that trust unless I could prove undeniably that this way of working was going to allow for me to never have to remember everything in this fallible mind of mine?
ยนโด|โโ
Then after a long coaching session with @soenke_ahrens, I realized that he gave me a clueโa vital clue linking what I didn't know with what I did know.
He gently guided me to this concept of critical mass, without revealing how powerful that moment would be.
ยนโต|โโ
See, my interpretation of a critical mass of notes is when after building out my Zettelkasten over timeโI stumble upon a note that I had completely forgotten about.
ยนโถ|โโ
If the experience of writing a new Permanent Note is an actual memory.
ยนโธ|โโ
Then taking the captured Fleeting Notes, processing them upwards towards a crystallized thought, and then spending the time connecting it to all Relevant Notes that I have ever written is all I have to remember.
ยนโน|โโ
And what this communication partner has done for me is bore the weight of my memory and reminded meโsurprised me!
This was the litmus test of whether I could trust again, and the excitement hasn't left me ever since.
ยฒโฐ|โโ
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're literally beaten to death to always have the right fucking answers, it only makes sense that venturing off into the darkness might be a bit scary.
Unless, you're from the dark. Unless, you're familiar with all that is dark.
There's hope my friends, but it's tough! ๐ฅ
I think this is why we have people in our lives, that love us enough to show us lightโto show us life.
Looking at ourselves in the mirror is hopelessly impossible because we'll never be able to really see past our own viewpoint.
No matter how legitimate we've been harmed...
We still need each other to see where we're wrong. Or fuck it, where we've been right...
I'm thinking there's plenty of folks out there, who we all think is strong and buoyantโflailing in their own shortcomings.
This is based on my Zettelkasten Method, but primarily it's maximizing the power of the granularity of the block! ๐งฑ
1๏ธโฃ Make a page called [[Clients]], then have each parent-level block listed:
โข [[Client A]]
โข [[Client B]]
2๏ธโฃ Then in the Daily Notes page, create a /Current Time and nest underneath the ๐๐ก๐ค๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ค๐๐ with [[Client A]]
Even though [[Niklas Luhmann]] creatively mitigated the limitations of a physical slip box, the hinderance from juggling such things in this analog form, is comparably weak to the efficiency of an implementation in the digital realm
READ ON:
1๏ธโฃ The main difficulty with a physical slip box is the actual index cards, while even using the thinnest cards possible, the juggling of such materials is obsolete within the digital realm
2๏ธโฃ [[Niklas Luhmann]] creatively cut the paper to it's smallest physical limitations and utilized the thinnest index cards that he could, but even with these solutions the weakness was apparent when he would have to juggle such things, which has huge detriment to workflow
Sometimes the answers are right under your nose! @RoamBookClub
Just go into the Linked References for each Day and then follow just how much time everyone is spending in @RoamResearch but then look a little deeper and read what these folks are actually writing.
If you don't start tearing up, from reading just how vulnerable everyone gets...
There's no ON-BOARDING if they don't write notes.
And there's no ON-BOARDING in someone's head, it has to be actualized, it has to be proven to work.