Had a fun talk (link below) with Vladislav Inozemtsev and Vasily Zharkov about #sanctions, Russia - West relations and the role sanctions play in Russian domestic opposition discourse. #Belarus & #sanctions theme was also mentioned. Few key points and arguments:
Inozemtsev: sanctions or not West can't change Russian regime; no sanctions whatsoever can kick Putin out of Kremlin; Russia is simply too strong to be coerced by sanctions (It's not Yugoslavia);
Sanctions need to be fast - in order to work, they can't be anticipated
Western sanctions policy towards Russia is careful, moderate and cautious. $$$ matters.
Sanctions are a feature of solidarity with UA and affirmation of Euro-Atlantic unity. NS2 sanctions was a weird story from day one;
As long as Putin does not escalate (considerably) no new
meaningful sanctions would be introduced; we are witnessing a sanctions pause - Washington and Moscow seek new form of communication; However no reset is possible, we're talking about 'some coordination' in 'some areas'.
Vasily Zharkov: sanctions and the West in general can't
help Russian opposition; the West has been consistent in respecting Russian sovereignty. Sanctions are only about western national interests, those in Russian opposition who count on it are mistaken greatly.
Sanctions are often about values, norms and self-perception
Let's be clear, this dialogue between Moscow and Washington is a not a bad news. Russian regime is quite stable - let's not fool ourselves about the prospects of the protest in Russia. Revolution is not coming.
Back to sanctions, contrary to Russia, Belarus is the case where sanctions can obliterate Minsk regime in a matter of months. But clearly, we see no political will to do that.
Inozemtsev asks a rhetorical: where are the frozen assets of hundreds of sanctioned Russians?
Bottom-line, Kremlin is ready to risk, ready to go full on - EU is not ready to risk, it is too timid to deal with possible consequences.
Zharkov stresses that whatever Western powers might say, there is a lot of push back about fighting dirty money coming from Russia and
elsewhere, so let's not be too surprised about "symbolism of sanctions".
What can the West do to help fighting autocracies in Eastern Europe?
Zharkov: support emigre communities, open big Russian university in EU, launch major Russian language media;
Inozemtsev: do the opposite!
Inozemtsev goes Warhammer mode, solidarizing with @IlvesToomas: says strip all Russians of European visas and residency permits - make them go back and take down Putin's regime. Says Russian opposition abroad will never do anything for Russia and will never come back home.
A lot more here: check it for yourself. It's in Russian
A join project of @RiddleRussia and Liberal Mission Foundation

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anton Barbashin

Anton Barbashin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ABarbashin

30 Jul
Some argue this is a "New Cold War", some argue it is a different thing altogether. Sergei Karaganov says it is Cold War 2.0. and Russia is already winning with the help of it's "semi-ally" China. His points are: Russia is stronger than late Soviet Union, West is much weaker
than 30 years ago; Putin is much more clever than Soviet leaders in terms of military spending and power projection; Let China take most of heavy lifting, if things go well for them, Russia can distance itself from Beijing - if China starts loosing, Russia should invest
in defeating the West more resources, we're looking at 10-15 horizon. Karaganov has yet another big narrative idea. So, it is "Greater America" (US + Western, Northern Europe) vs. Big Eurasia (Russia, China + some CEU and Southern Europe nations). Says key battle is Germany.
Read 6 tweets
24 Jan
Does supporting Navalny always mean supporting him personally? The answer is no. Many presume that all Russians who publicly voice their support for Navalny wish him to be Russia’s president and thus endorse his political program. It is far from the truth.
Whether it is the case of his views on migration or reconsidering privatisation of the 1990s or a dozen other issues. The truth is he is the only one who was able to create a political infrastructure capable of challenging Putin’s “System”.
To the day he is the only political agent in Russia that offers a possibility to deconstruct authoritarian personalised regime that stifles economic development and constantly creates FP crises around Russia. Large numbers of Russians want a reasonable relationship with US and EU
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(