VADM Hill, MDA Director at #SMD2021: “The big change for us as an agency…we used to spend most of our time worried about countermeasures [decoys, etc]…but with these coordinated attacks we see today, it’s about maneuver and speed.”
Hill: Intercepting low, maneuvering threats in "terminal phase...is never where we want to be"
Hill highlights need for layered capability. And here's this year's MDA placemat. Is there a wording change? Today's Layered *Active* Missile Defense System? would dovetail with increasing focus on active and passive defense.
Hill: Aegis and THAAD integrated system "candidate systems" for Guam and CENTCOM deployments.
Hill: Machine learning is “an awesome frisbee to throw around the Pentagon and bounce off of walls." "It's not magic in my mind...it needs to come out of the S&T world and into the hands of the warfighter as soon as possible."
Hill: Missile defense tests generate terabytes of data. "Are we assessing all that data? The answer is no." Notes examples where engineers have found previously unseen patterns in telemetry data stream. AI/ML seen as extremely useful for analyzing flight test telemetry.
Waiting for hypersonic weapons to come across ground-based field of view "does not make me feel good at all." Emphasizes need for space-based architecture. Satellites can "see the flash from space," later follow through with tracking.
Hill: "You have to do an error budget analysis across the whole kill chain."
Hill extends earlier remarks on counter hypersonic architecture, shows MDA concept video:
HBTSS sensors: "It's not new science." Looking at warm earth for warm target can pose challenge, but "we've proven that on the ground," and 2 contractors preparing for launch. HBTSS only satellite with "positional and velocity errors that are tight enough" to do intercepts.
Hill: HBTSS isn't LEO, but "in an inclination that leverages the testing we've done in the INDOPACOM region."
On why Army Mid-Range Capability can't launch an SM-3: SM-6 is "kind of a fire and forget...not as much reliance on uplink/downlink," but SM-3 depends on comms with SPY radar, would cost hundreds of millions to reengineer to launch on the road with MRC.
Hill: "We tend to have more friends than some of these competitors." In his prior work on the Rolling Airframe Missile, "I was stunned by the type of seeker technology Germany was developing."
Hill: "We need to start way to the left" of FMS and see where US can incorporate allies in development, architecture work, and other types of cooperation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gen James at #SMD2021 panel: As SPACECOM's mandate begins over 100 km in the atmosphere, "my team is in charge of perhaps the largest AOR in the universe"
Gen Brady: "we've been focused a lot of fixed and semifixed assets" but Army intent on pivoting to protect the maneuver force. Says European allies very interested in this capability.
Brady: Army AAMDC is focused more on interoperability; excited for IBCS, but in interim, Mission Partner Environment developed recently aids in passing info to allies, esp. legacy tactical datalinks.
At #SMD2021, Adm. Richard cautions against comparing stockpile sizes, because half of US stockpile "operationally unavailable" due to treaty constraints. Also asks OSINTers to keep looking for Chinese siloes; "I usually have to pay someone to do that"
Richard: China "soon to be the pacing threat in most categories," and Russia "seeking to solidify great power status"—points to Moscow's gray zone actions.
Russia "has over 2,000 non-treaty accountable" tactical nuclear weapons. And "has the capacity to drastically increase" its nuclear stockpile. "Russia has more strategic missile defense than we do; theirs is nuclear-tipped and they're improving it."
Dr. Shari Feth, MDA tech lead uses fun graphic at #SMD2021. In which the boater is the PM and the lumberjack is the technologist.
Feth emphasizes that the program side should have a dual-hatted chief technology officer and dedicated plan to aid in tech transition. Programs lack incentives to evaluate new technologies without bridge planning and people.
In panel, SMDC tech lead Dr. Michael Zmuda discusses future threat environment: "synchronized" and "integrated" attacks; "it's not multidomain, it's all domain"; focus on winning cost equation.
#SMD2021 the Mid-Range Capability will involve multirole launcher that can fire Tomahawk or SM-6. "We actually have a missile on the rail that can do offensive or defensive fires simultaneously."
RCCTO head Thurgood shows some photos of the LRHW delivery and describes the DE-MSHORAD shoot-off.
Slide on 2-prong high-end DE solution. IFPC to have a kinetic and nonkinetic element, which will feature the mobile 300kW HEL and fixed HPM.
VCJCS Hyten speaking at #SMDC2020:
"I wanna give the Army a little bit of a hard time...the Space and Missile Defense Command [name]—it's schizophrenic"
"Space is a place, missile defense is a mission."
Knowing laughter as Hyten discusses naming confusion with AAMDC.
Hyten: Joint fires, contested logistics, joint c2, information advantage are "supporting concepts" needed by joint force, recently signed strategic directive for services to build requirements.
Hyten: discusses service input/analysis of Joint Requirements Oversight Council process. Critiques "slow, moribund" DoD requirements bureaucracy. Points to Schriever and Minuteman, Rickover and sea-based deterrent as architects of DoD institutional change.
#SMD2021 panel: RCCTO internally referred to LRHW as Army's "dark eagle." No difference in 34.5" booster for Army and Navy systems, except canister. TEL is built off existing trailer, and "took a known C2 system" for battery operations.
BG Rafferty: "we're going to have an application on the Titan ground station that is going to generate the calls for fire"— ML model will be "driven by the commander's high priority target list"
"The materiel domain is leading…and pulling the other domains along. And I think that’s the reality of the Information Age, of the 21st century—is that technology is going to lead us. And it’s one of the fundamentals of the Army Futures Command approach, which is...