In 1977, we sent two records into interstellar space. The records contain the story of humans, such that any intercepting alien race can begin to understand us.

voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries/imag…
The records will tell the aliens how we count, how we describe the physical world, how we see both inside an atom and across a solar system.
The records will show aliens how we live and how we reproduce.
The images on the records will describe our lives, our community, our technology.
The records contains our sounds, of rain and thunder, of birds and elephants, of trains and planes and automobiles.

Of kisses.
Can’t help but think those aliens will be mighty disappointed when they pay us a visit.
And I’m now laughing as I imagine Daddy alien shouting at Children aliens to stay away from the needle…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emma Hilton

Emma Hilton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FondOfBeetles

2 Aug
And the +87kg Olympic weightlifting competition is just starting.

Come on, Emily!
Li Wenwen not even bothering to warm up 😂
Hubbard starting with 115kg snatch (current best 133kg). Li Wenwen in at 135kg.
Read 47 tweets
2 Aug
I had a quick appearance on @bbc5live with Joanna Harper this morning. From 8:20 here:

bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/li…
I wasn’t given time to challenge Harper’s final words, so I will do so here. @markchapman @rachelburden

Harper: Hubbard doesn’t have an ‘overwhelming advantage’, therefore her inclusion is fair.

(Not verbatim)
Hubbard does have an overwhelming advantage.

Using her performances as junior male and Masters/senior female, and accounting for a small loss of strength in transition, estimates from my academic colleagues who study elite weightlifting put her male advantage at 25-50%.
Read 12 tweets
30 Jul
They are not.

This is the first thing the IOC has got right on this.

IOC admits guidelines for transgender athletes are not fit for purpose | Tokyo Olympic Games 2020 | The Guardian theguardian.com/sport/2021/jul…
As ever, @seaningle reporting in a balanced, reasonable manner.
When your rules permit a medal challenge by a 43 year old male who has taken a career beak of nearly twenty years and is over 15 years older than the competition, the rules are wrong.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jul
A couple of explainers to follow.

………….

The data does not support the IOC decision to include trans-identified m... via @YouTube
From Hilton and Lundberg, 2021. @TLexercise

“Using an age grading model designed to normalize times for masters/veteran categories, Harper analyzed self-selected and self-reported race times for eight transgender women runners of various age categories…
…who had, over an average 7 year period (range 1–29 years), competed in sub-elite middle and long distance races within both the male and female categories.
Read 16 tweets
22 Jul
@Scienceofsport @njstone9 “Hubbard says she stopped weightlifting in 2001 at the age of 23 "because it just became too much to bear", blaming "the pressure of trying to fit into a world that perhaps wasn't really set up for people like myself".
@Scienceofsport @njstone9 “After transitioning to female aged 35 in 2012, it would be another five years before Hubbard competed at international weightlifting competitions - and she achieved immediate success.”
@Scienceofsport @njstone9 It can’t just be me that realises how utterly insane it is that this is a person who didn’t lift weights for over 15 years - 15 years - and has, in a couple of years of retraining, become competitive at the highest level???
Read 7 tweets
5 Jul
From the latest Science-Based Medicine blog attempt at defending their retraction of Harriet Hall’s review of Abigail Shrier’s book.

Advocating the prioritisation of social justice over scientific investigation. Image
And cheers to ‘aav’ (in the comments) for highlighting this nonsense, and to @lecanardnoir for highlighting aav!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(