I think, Pakistan may not really have thought this through.

Many of the fighters who have gone to Afghanistan now, were earlier Pakistan's cannon-fodder. They're now in Afghanistan, and thus aren't available to Pakistan any further.

In Afghanistan, they have the goodies & power
There is no incentive for them to come and fight for Pakistan against India in Kashmir.

Pakistan may not have the same level of control on political messaging in various seminaries in Afghanistan, where they can spread the same anti-India hate as happened in Pakistan.
Effectively, Taliban have been freed from Pakistani oversight and control.

Sure, in Afghanistan, Taliban will do mayhem as per their ideology, but politically Taliban is now free.
So what exactly will Pakistan use to coerce and nudge the Taliban to do their bidding?

Ideology, old ISI network, etc. Sure, clearly. But Taliban will become financially free from Pakistan, making deals with China, with CARs, with Iran. Perhaps with India too.
India should encourage Taliban to become as free as possible from Pakistan in political and economic terms.

Ideologically, India can't do much there.
Taliban can't expand into India just yet. They will have to first expand into Pakistan, into CARs, into Xinjiang.

And that means much turmoil to keep everybody busy.

TTP, ETIM, IMU aren't going anywhere.
India should try to see this change as an opportunity to screw Pakistan using their own proxy.

Even Imran is saying, Taliban have broken their chains of slavery from Pakistan. 😁

What India should not allow is for Pakistan to create a North Korea for it, where "terrorism" charges are shifted to "Afghanistan" and Pakistan gets to play the role of "moderate interlocuter", just as China allows North Korea to do nuclear blackmail of Japan and South Korea.
It is for this reason, that India should give even the Taliban-led Afghanistan more options than just dependence on Pakistan.
This is their preferred direction of movement

There is a chance that Taliban are not some dumb extension of Pakistan's hostile attitude towards India.

Taliban may also have Pashtun pride which is at odds with Rawalpindi's Pakjabi agenda.

In that case, there is enough space for India to work in.

Regarding Taliban's takeover in Kabul, I want India's strategic thinkers to go to the basics and try to understand, what exactly has changed for India.

Two changes:
1) women's rights and security in Afghanistan is over.

2) India's old friends in Afghanistan have lost power.
Beyond the above two facts, what else are Indians worried about?

Indians are jumping to conclusions, based on acquired and borrowed angst and thus getting needlessly apprehensive about the future.
1) Americans out of Afpak is good for India, because we don't need to pay heed to US sensitivities anymore when defining our geopolitical interests in Afpak and recovering PoK.

US also need not pay Pakistan any rent for supply routes and bases anymore.
2) Erstwhile political slaves of Pakistan: the Taliban, are now free, and they have now their own country. They are not dependent on Pakistan anymore.

So less trained fighters for Pakistan for the time being.
3) Previous Afghan govt did not have much influence within Pakistan, but the Taliban have deep influence.

So when Af-Pak relations go south as they invariably will, Pakistan has got a lot more to worry about now.
4) If China uses Wakhan corridor as route to the southwest, CPEC and PoK loses value to the Chinese.

With USA gone, China can do so.
So even though it is the right decision to evacuate Indian personnel and Dharmics from Afghanistan right now, soon it will time for India to move back in
The other question is how does one ensure that Taliban do not use and do not let Pakistan use Afghan territory against India. The answer has to be more than simply "hope" and "good faith".

I believe Indian Army shd raise an Afghan Regiment inside it, comprising of ANA commandos.
They can be financed by them providing security services to various Gulf monarchies.

It will help India to build a security framework with the Gulf countries.

The Afghan Regiment should remain as a sword hanging over the Taliban to ensure their good conduct.
It seems that not everybody has capitulated to Taliban.

India may need to consider Afghanistan as currently fractured.

India can recognize the government only over the area that they control.

So, it is Taliban govt over Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (33 provinces) and ...
Amrullah Saleh as President of Afghanistan (Panjshir Province)

One has to admit that the civil war is not over yet.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dharmic Fundoo🚩🌺

Dharmic Fundoo🚩🌺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DharmicFundoo

16 Aug
Some thoughts on Afghanistan moving forward.

1. Taliban in Afg is reality.

2. Neither Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan, USA nor Turkey will be trying to dislodge it. There's no opposition game left anymore.

3. Afghans have been betrayed, ANA units have crossed over to Taliban.
4. It is of no use to try to deny the Taliban recognition from our side. They ARE in power.

5. Our recognition or lack of it, doesn't make them weaker. They have access to Pak, Iran, China, Russia, etc, who can meet all their diplomatic and investment requirements.
6. If India had a credible game in Afghanistan, then it would have been different. Then we may have supported other groups. But we don't. We lack land access. We can't really help anybody there.
Read 16 tweets
14 Aug
India will give refuge to the religious minorities fleeing Afghanistan, notably to Hindus and Sikhs.

India will also give refuge to those Afghans, who have shown friendship and cooperation to India in building Afghanistan, so that they survive to again rebuild Afghanistan.
Taliban's reign comes. It is apparently unavoidable. But another day will again come, when Afghans will return to the land. That day will require the knowledge, skills and services of patriotic Afghans in exile. For that day, they need to survive.
Afghans need to survive to tell the story of Pakistani treachery and Pakistani support to terror and rape.
Read 4 tweets
8 Mar
Ideologically speaking, till now West has looked upon India as a country with an imposed Western democracy, a democracy that requires oversight by the West, to make sure India lives up to the liberal democratic ideals as perceived by the West.
West doesn't see India with an own democratic culture as West sees democracy itself as a Western (Greek) invention.

In this regard, it was important that on Feb 8th, 2021, Modi gave this clarification in Indian Parliament.

Check: @ 2:25

PM Modi said, "Our democracy is not a western institution. It's a human institution. India's history is filled with examples of democratic institutions. We find mention of 81 democracies in ancient India."

deccanherald.com/national/india…
Read 14 tweets
7 Mar
This is a monumental change in thinking. Sri Lanka cannot really get into an open confrontation with India, so they will have to accept it. Also it may give a much bigger voice to Tamils in Sri Lanka, who can be open about supporting the party, knowing India has their back.
This also affects TN politics, as BJP would be considered even more Dravidianist being the voice of Tamil Eezham! An excellent move.

This approach is designed to ensure peace in Sri Lanka.

Any complaints of Sri Lankan Tamils will be dealt with in an adult way in cooperation with other Sri Lankan parties.

Alternative wd have been to leave SL Tamils at mercy of mischief making conversion Mafia or CCP Commies.
Read 5 tweets
20 Nov 20
For Indians:

What is the difference between American Left and American Liberals?

American Left dislike Hindus because they have been brainwashed to believe that Hindus who love their country are in fact some sort of "Hindu fascists", told the lie that India oppresses minorities
American Left do not know Indians history of what the Hindus have had to go through - exploitation, slavery, cultural genocide, untold massacres, robbery by both Islamist invaders and rulers, then by the British, and then by British proxies - the Congress (INC) und Nehru-Gandhis.
American Left do not know all that what Modi has done to help the poor in India - free bank accounts, direct cash transfer support, free cooking gas, electricity connections, toilets, housing, health insurance, pension schemes for small traders and farmers, etc.
Read 16 tweets
18 Nov 20
It's hard for Dems to convince people that a ticket with a Prez candidate, who has nothing appealing about him - dementia, corruption, CCP-apologism, credit-card lobbyism, 47 years of public non-service; and a VP on the ticket, who got just 844 votes in primary can win 78 m votes
#AuditTheVote is very important for US democracy.

Without it, there will be no closure.
In 2008, Obama won the biggest mandate till 2020 - 69.5 million votes. He had charisma and carried the hopes of many after the wars. Trump won 73,35 million votes in 2020. Hard to believe, that Biden-Harris, two of the most dull politicos in USA, can win 80 million votes.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(