Got some questions regarding the flow of funds in an RE deal

The flow of funds is actually determined by the lender, which is provided in loan docs. Then, the operating agreement will have a separate FOF afterward for "excess" funds

Lender FOF on the left, LLC FOF on the right
Cash Management typically occurs when a debt covenant has been breached (usually the DSCR or Debt Yield dipping below a required threshold)

Once this occurs, all cash is swept into a "lockbox" controlled by the lender and follows the "lockbox" FOF (rather than the normal FOF)
The Cash Management Period can typically be resolved by 2 consecutive calendar quarters above a specific DSCR or Debt Yield threshold, after which time revenue is no longer swept into a lockbox and the normal flow of funds resumes
For what it's worth, the flow of funds has been simplified a lot - there're a lot of other possible fund flows

This chart doesn't address security deposits, casualty/condemnation subaccounts, etc

It can get extremely complex with more sophisticated deals
Additionally, the normal flow of funds (when not in cash management) differs greatly depending on how strict your bank is

Sometimes your bank is extremely lenient and the flow of funds is essentially voluntary

Other times the taxes/insurance/reserves are reserved for you
Once the cash reaches the "available cash" box in the diagrams above, it's then subject to the operating agreement, which obviously is under your control - so doesn't *have* to flow the way it does

The right picture shows how the LP/GP "waterfall" is typically structured
The waterfall structure in the image above is based on a promote waterfall of 20% promote over a 10% return and 30% over a 30% return promote

In the above graphic, the GP is the "General Manager" and the LPs are the "Class B Members"
That's pretty much it - the flow of funds are actually pretty logical

If you're interested in more content like this, sign up for my email list below

mailchi.mp/e4a4254d3361/r…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Real Estate God

The Real Estate God Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheRealEstateG6

15 Sep
Think people go about choosing a market all wrong. RE investors make money on mispricings

Smaller mkt=less competition=less price discovery=more mispricings=easier to generate outsized returns

So your main criteria for a mkt should be "place with the least competition"

THREAD:
Most people will tell you to look for population growth, etc

But that just means more competition

If 15 firms are bidding on a deal (like in bigger/higher growth markets) there's no mispricing and only way you get outsized returns is if you're lucky or have a unique biz plan
So (as long as you're searching for short term flips) I would ignore all of those "population growth"-type stats entirely

The only stat that matters is finding a market that has the most mispricings. Everything else is essentially useless noise
Read 25 tweets
2 Sep
Since I've been getting a ton of DMs about the RE career path,

// DECODING REAL ESTATE CAREERS //: An in-depth overview of the career paths in the real estate sector, which ones you want to target and which ones you want to avoid
Read 6 tweets
18 Aug
Majority of your yield is locked in at acquisition, which is why buying well is so important

Even an accretive, high return-on-cost action only represents a fraction of the purchase price - which is why having great deal flow (good purchase price) is so important

For example...
Say you buy a building for $10MM at a 5% cap rate, meaning the NOI is $500k

The building is 100 units and you plan on spending $1MM renovating it to increase the rents by $1,200/year in each unit ($120k revenue increase in total)
That's a 12% return on cost ($120k/$1MM) - which is pretty good, considering you bought the building for a 5% cap rate

After the renovations at the property are complete, the stabilized yield will be $620k/$11MM = 5.64%
Read 9 tweets
15 Aug
Completely correct. Probably easiest to illustrate this by showing how you can build out a real estate firm in 2 different scenarios

Scenario 1: You keep the "firm" small (1-man shop) and only invest your own money

Scenario 2: You take on investor money and grow out a PE firm
For both scenarios, lets assume you're pursuing a value-add strategy that's expected to 2x your capital in 5 years (~15% IRR)
In Scenario 1, you can stay in far smaller deal ranges. Let's say you stay in the $2MM-$10MM deal range.

If you do a $6MM deal, that would require ~$2MM of equity. A 2x on that capital would net you $2MM profit
Read 13 tweets
29 Jul
Bringing back an old ex. after today's deal structuring questions

DEAL STRUCTURE - HOW TO ANALYZE A DEAL LIKE THIS:

Deals like this are all about:

1. How quickly you can get your money out
2. How "secure" the cashflow is

We'll go through both in order

1. How quick you can get your $$ out

A 10% cap rate on $1.3MM is $130k of NOI. Since this is a retail deal, I probably won't leverage above 60%

60% * $1.3MM = $780k. Assuming a 5% interest rate (interest-only debt, your debt payment would be ~$40k, leaving you ~$90k of cashflow
$90k * 5 years = $450k of cashflow over 5 years

Initial equity in the deal is:

$1.3MM PP + $50k deal costs = $1.35MM

$1.35MM - $780k debt = $570k of initial equity

So over the 5 years of the lease, you would be able to pull out $450k of $570k (~80%) in cashflow alone
Read 18 tweets
28 Jul
HOW TO KNOW WHEN TO IMPROVE YOUR PROPERTY:

Return on cost is simply the revenue boost or cost savings of a specific action (ex renovating units) divided by the cost to get there

Anytime the ROC exceeds the cap rate you bought the property for, that action is accretive
For example, on my newest deal, changing out the toilets to more efficient toilets saves ~$3.5k/year on the water bill. Cost of the toilets will be ~$175/toilet*40 units = $7k. Add in labor costs, $10k total

That’s a ROC of 35%, which is very accretive as I’m buying for an 8 cap
Essentially, the starting NOI was $200k and the purchase price was $2.5MM ($200k/$2.5MM = 8% cap rate)

That $200k NOI becomes $203.5k after the cost savings and the cost of the deal becomes $2.51MM, resulting in an 8.1% yield, a 10 bps increase from the 8% I bought it for
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(