Well.
Looks like someone got sloshed last night and retweeted pictures inciting violence against women.
This was @chick_in_kiev's response to being challenged on her journalistic failure on the #wispa incident in @thenation.
thenation.com/article/societ…
Looks like someone got sloshed last night and retweeted pictures inciting violence against women.
This was @chick_in_kiev's response to being challenged on her journalistic failure on the #wispa incident in @thenation.
thenation.com/article/societ…
@chick_in_kiev @thenation Failures:
1) Did not contact woman who complained
2) Presents view that males should keep out of women's changing rooms as "white power movement"
3) Omits to say the woman who complained was black
1) Did not contact woman who complained
2) Presents view that males should keep out of women's changing rooms as "white power movement"
3) Omits to say the woman who complained was black
4) Misrepresents woman's complaint. She said there was a MAN in the changing room, not a "trans woman".
5) Claims the complaint cannot be valid because children were neither filmed nor identified, which is a bizarre demand to breach child privacy.
5) Claims the complaint cannot be valid because children were neither filmed nor identified, which is a bizarre demand to breach child privacy.
The logical tailspin:
Woman: There's a man in the women's changing room!
Attendant: That's a trans woman.
W: He's showing his penis!
A: Her woman's penis.
W: Whatever you call him, that's a MAN showing his PENIS to CHILDREN!
Journalists:
Bigot! Liar! There was no trans woman!
Woman: There's a man in the women's changing room!
Attendant: That's a trans woman.
W: He's showing his penis!
A: Her woman's penis.
W: Whatever you call him, that's a MAN showing his PENIS to CHILDREN!
Journalists:
Bigot! Liar! There was no trans woman!
Here are some of the journalists twisting the truth to claim a woman complained about a "trans woman" in the women's changing room at #wispa.
She did not. She complained about a man.
Evan Urquhart in @Slate
Talia Levin in @thenation
Sam Levin & Lois Beckett in the @guardian
She did not. She complained about a man.
Evan Urquhart in @Slate
Talia Levin in @thenation
Sam Levin & Lois Beckett in the @guardian
These journalists say:
There was no trans woman! (which she never claimed)
There were no kids! (because they weren't filmed 🤡)
They claim it's a "pretext", a "hoax", a "staged incident".
Remember: this was a woman complaining about a naked MAN in the women's dressing room.
There was no trans woman! (which she never claimed)
There were no kids! (because they weren't filmed 🤡)
They claim it's a "pretext", a "hoax", a "staged incident".
Remember: this was a woman complaining about a naked MAN in the women's dressing room.
Oh but look what we have here.
LA Magazine reports on JULY 30 (note the date), that FIVE WOMEN have lodged a police complaint, all "claiming to have seen male genitals exposed in the women’s section" of #wispa.
lamag.com/citythinkblog/…
LA Magazine reports on JULY 30 (note the date), that FIVE WOMEN have lodged a police complaint, all "claiming to have seen male genitals exposed in the women’s section" of #wispa.
lamag.com/citythinkblog/…
This includes the woman referred to in all the journalists' reports, who clearly complained about A MAN, despite the attendant's strenuous attempts to make her believe that a naked male in the women's section is ipso facto a trans woman.
Slate printed a weaselly little update, noting the police report, but saying that still doesn't prove it wasn't a hoax.
So they're now leading readers to believe that women are banding together and filing false police reports about naked men in women's changing rooms.
Bold.
So they're now leading readers to believe that women are banding together and filing false police reports about naked men in women's changing rooms.
Bold.
However, the @Guardian has made no such correction and presumably sticks its story that this was somehow a "staged incident".
https://twitter.com/yatakalam/status/1420695666968432643
As to Talia Levin, she published her error-riddled ideological article on August 18, several WEEKS after the police report had been filed, and does not mention it, also giving the impression that somehow this was all just a "pretext".
thenation.com/article/societ…
thenation.com/article/societ…
So anyway, that was exhibit #97382 on how gender ideology is the death of journalism.
As stated previously:
As stated previously:
https://twitter.com/yatakalam/status/1420720518194466817
Anyway, here are some T-shirts you can buy:
https://twitter.com/yatakalam/status/1411824385615446017
(For the record, in case anyone thinks the first tweet in this thread was... conjecture)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
