Let's talk about the group who pushed Mastercard to further restrict adult content, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, or NCOSE.
This group was originally called Operation Yorkville, and they were an anti-obscenity group. They linked material like "Fanny Hill" to atheism, obscenity, juvenile delinquency, masturbation, murder, sexually transmitted diseases and "high school sex clubs". In 1962.
The group claimed it was about "protecting the children", but First Amendment Law Review wrote that "at times the organization seemed to be using children as a pretext for a society-wide ban".
They had competition for self-righteous moralizing in the Citizens for Decency in Literature, which started in 1956 and made this fucking incredible relic of a film, "Perversion for Profit".
CDL painted themselves as "not anti-sex, but anti-perversion".
Still, CDL lost out to Operation Yorkville, who rebranded to Morality in Media in 1968. They weren't as media savvy, or as politically influential. Charles Keating, founder of CDL, ditched them to become a white collar criminal and they never recovered.
Meanwhile, Father Morton A. Hill of St. Ignatius Loyola Roman Catholic Church, became president of Morality in Media. He was appointed to serve on the 18-member President's Commission on Obscenity & Pornography by President Lyndon B. Johnson, and had the ear of Nixon and Reagan.
To give you an idea, they also tried to ban George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" routine, and Monty Python's "Life of Brian". They pressured landlords into pushing out adult stores. They rioted against Time Warner and Disney.
Problem was, while MiM were of their time in the 60s, they were increasingly looking hysterical and dated in the 90s. They were losing the attention and support of politicians. The 1996 Communications Decency Act, which they supported, was ruled unconstitutional in 1997.
Morality in Media kept at it, though, advocating for internet filters and against safer sex education to little avail. In 2010, Bob Peters, part of the leadership, conceded that "the war is over and we have lost".
Then. In 2015. They see anti-porn "feminists" are getting a bit of traction in the UK fighting against extreme pornography and legal sex work. They rebrand again.
Suddenly, they're not anti-porn because of morality. They're anti-porn because of EXPLOITATION.
(To be fair, Morality in Media and similar groups had worked alongside anti-porn "feminists" before with some success. So this wasn't an entirely new strategy. jstor.org/stable/828376)
So now, you have anti-sex work "feminist" academics happily providing biased "studies" to evangelical Christians and Catholics as ammo for their morality war.
That works to win over Republicans, who tout family values but keep getting into sex scandals.
It's a good headline.
Thus Morality in Media rebrands as National Center on Sexual Exploitation & gets into the anti-trafficking game (focused, as so much anti-trafficking stuff is, exclusively on sex trafficking, ignoring other exploitation, cause sex sells)
NCOSE becomes a primary supporter of FOSTA/SESTA, the EARN IT Act, and, you guessed it - began to pressure Mastercard/Visa into ending their payment processing for adult content. Because "trafficking", right?
Fact is though, this isn't actually about sex trafficking, or child abuse.
And you can see that by who gets impacted.
Laws supposedly meant to fight sex trafficking end up impacting immigrants, trans people, BIPOC, and consensual sex workers (both at work and in their daily lives)
And as far as Morality in Media - oh, sorry, NCOSE - if a lot of LGBTQ content and sex ed content happens to be knocked offline while they "fight porn", oh well ;)
This is why OnlyFans a) isn't a surprise or a new censorship push, it's the same one that's been going on since the Hays Code and b) this isn't, and never was, just about porn, or trafficking.
It's about forcing the country into "Christian values", they're just savvy now.
ANYWAY I hope that educated some people on the absolute hell we're in right now. If you learned something, consider sending me some $ on venmo - @kittystryker - or subscribing to my Patreon patreon.com/kittystryker
Wanted to add- @mirahimage made a very good point- as US payment processors dominate the worldwide market to the point of being a monopoly, almost all roads lead to Visa/Mastercard. So conservative white supremacist Christian "values" end up informing access to info worldwide.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've seen some tweets and articles equate "explicit" content with "adult" content. As someone who has worked intimately with the adult industry, I can promise you those distinctions are both vastly different, and yet purposefully vague.
I'm trying to put together a comprehensive history on censorship of "explicit content" and/or sex workers online as best I can - who am I missing here? Bonus if you have links!
Morality crackdown online starts with GooglePlus/Apple (2010), app stores (2010), Wikipedia (2010), Craigslist (2010)
Then they came for sex work sites: Rentboy (2015), MyRedbook (2015), Eros (2017), Backpage (2018)
And website templates/blogs: Blogger (2015), Wordpress (2018 for sure, though I think it was in place earlier)
I've been speaking up about the issues banks and payment processors have been causing adult creators and sex toy companies for a LOOOOONG time. This is far from a new issue. I'm going to give you a list of some of the interviews and writing I've done on this topic over the years.
OnlyFans made money off the labor of sex workers and now participate in their stigmatization. Absolutely pathetic. They should be fucking ashamed.
I guess they can join the ranks of Tumblr, Craigslist, PayPal, and more - at least Patreon does their best to give people workarounds, and has the decency to be apologetic about it
It's important to note that it's not just straight up porn that gets hit by obscenity censorship, but LGBTQ content (which is often still considered "adult" and sexually charged simply for being LGBTQ) and sex education content (including consent conversations, BTW)
When people talk about "violent antifa" and "violent BLM", know that the main medic who showed up to try and save right winger Jay Bishop's life was a Black woman who believes Black Lives Matter. Cops shoved her away, kicked her gear into the gutter, and watched him die.
His friend in white, who responds to a cop asking what happened with "I DON'T KNOW, FUCK YOU" before taking off is Chandler Pappas. I wondered if Pappas took off because he wasn't supposed to be at this protest - turns out I was right, it violates his parole.
Should I even bother telling you about Jay Bishop and how he repeatedly came to these protests armed with guns and bear mace, looking to fight? I don't know. Does it matter that he was a violent felon? I don't know.
I am exhausted by men claiming to be feminists while simultaneously shutting down anyone who says otherwise, or who asks them to take a step back and look at their behavior.
Today's object lesson - Rob Brezsney of Free Will Astrology.
On the surface, this post looks great - he was informed of his repost being authored by a serial abuser, so he removed it. Cool, right?
Except he deleted multiple women and non binary people telling him this, and then posted like that never happened. Suspicious.
I was curious how long it would take for me to have a post removed asking him about this, and asking him to consider how that appears to others.
Took 17 minutes. Also I was blocked from commenting.