This report is a majority report, backed by the Labor and Greens Senators.
Straight off the bat:
If gas companies getting subsidies for exploration go on to make a lot of money, they should have to pay the subsidies back.
The inquiry heard fierce opposition from Traditional Owners who said they had not given free, prior and informed consent - and the committee wants it looked at
Committee also wants the commonwealth and NT govts to do what they said they would do on fracking emissions NOW, not procrastinating another three years
a decent image for context
Prof Ian Lowe puts the scale of this gas resource in context. If it gets subsidised open with enough public money, it could be catastrophically large
🔥
I wonder if the PM regrets stacking his COVID Commission with gas people at the beginning of a multi year pandemic instead of focusing on vaccine procurement and the actual pandemic
The Liberal led scrutiny committee thinks this is another dodgy energy regulation. Minister has had only a couple of months to respond, I'm sure he'll get around to it.
One of the grant assessors (the one from the NT govt) originally said Empire Energy was not eligible. So what happened?
The report has a good summary of the companies with titles in the Basin, for future reference
Inquiries often turn up things that are apparently common practice, but are pretty wild.
Apparently it is normal to ask people to apply for grants before those grants are even legal under law.
Inquiries often turn up things that are apparently common practice, but are pretty wild. Apparently it is normal to ask people to apply for grants before those grants are even legal under law.
The report notes the conflicts of interest involved in a multimillion dollar grant to a company with multiple deep Liberal party connections.
In the period that the company was lobbying Angus Taylor, applying for, and then getting this grant, the largest shareholder, a Liberal party heavyweight and donor, and billionaire, was increasing his stake in the company.
How the gas company paid junket to the Beetaloo Basin ended up being Taylor, his head fundraiser, and a bunch of other Liberal party people
The committee finds "no evidence" that DISER has made any effort to ensure the Beetaloo gas grant program is not being rorted
The NT promised traditional owner consultation would be done independently.
Turns out it is being done by the gas industry, via its capture of CISRO (an alliance called 'GISERA' funded and steered by discretionary involvement of the gas industry)
the former mayor of darwin says the baseline studies are being done under pressure in a timeframe that means they wont be able to do it properly
consultation body suppose to oversea the implementation of fracking regulation in NT has been shut down
Again - one of the grant assessors said it wasn't eligible, but it got the money anyway, and we still don;t know why
later in the report the committee is concerned about how the grant was deemed ineligible by one of the assessors and the lack of info about why
This is pretty bloody clear
and on - the committee finds the beetaloo grant program was 'highly flawed'
Doesn't the NT need fracking to help bail it out?
Recent experience suggests the opposite. Gas delivers few all jobs and the small royalties are eroded by large subsidies.
Beetaloo Basin gas is being lined up for export - even the domestic gas supply argument is nonsense.
And we don't need it because the best fuel is the fuel we don't need to use because we can electrify more cheaply
Numerous studies, including those commissioned by govts, show the Beetaloo Basin is likely to be a very expensive source of gas - unless it is very heavily subsidised, or unless they find oil, which the regulations are not being designed for
ALP and Greens claim subsidies in the Beetaloo basin "will bring few jobs, little tax, and will continue to be a drain on Australian taxpayers for decades to come."
The inquiry heard powerful and at times distressing evidence from traditional owners who do not want fracking on their country
The inquiry heard a LOT of evidence about traditional owner consultation that was inappropriate, inadequate or completely absent
Many of the TOs wanted the $50 million to go to other social purposes, and not subsidise fracking companies
There were very high levels of distrust of gas company claims
The committee finds that TO concerns are being ignored
"The committee is not convinced that all Traditional Owners and Native Title holders in the Beetaloo have
provided Free, Prior and Informed Consent to petroleum activities on Country"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A year and a half after the govt put gas executives in charge of the COVID Commission, and weeks after COP26, we have today a new national plan to subsidise gas pipelines across Australia.
From the exec summary "Gas supplies are likely to fall short of domestic ///and export/// demand by the end of the decade if further action to unlock supply and deliver key infrastructure is not taken by industry"
Ie - subsidies to prop up bad investments in export terminals
Notorious non tax paying Santos has made clear that its interest in the Beetaloo is focused on exports.
higher petrol prices must have people thinking more about EVs. does anyone know, or have a simple modelling tool, for how much petrol prices impact the payback period for EVs?
obviously depends on lots of things - better fuel economy of alternative means less impact, amount of kms driven means more impact, etc.
and whether you are using real time pricing or own supply solar to charge
Clearest explanation I've heard of what Doherty modelling actually says and doesn't say just now from ACT Chief Minister.
Will be months before thresholds met and even then, "Broad brush talk of 'open up' does not mean there will no public health response".
Also, crucially, we are not starting from where the modelling starts - it assumes no/ v low outbreaks, not current situation
All journalists covering covid response should watch the ACT pressers. Beyond the local matters, super clear explanation of the national situation, calling out misunderstandings without blaming others
Fossil fuel subsidies in #Budget21 :
- money for billionaire Twiggy Forest's gas generator.
- more for other gas gens.
- subsidies to new gas basins.
- subsidies for oil.
Fossil fuel subsidies apparently the best examples of "economic resilience", presented without irony immediately above funding for disaster response funding.