Note: this does not mean vaccines kill 1 in 850 or so healthy 30-60 year-olds. Blood clotting is well understood to be a greater risk at high altitudes. Those with clotting issues have historically been warned about flying as an increased risk.
However, it's one more serious hole in the story of anyone who tries to sell us on the notion that nobody is dying from the vaccines.
I'd be very interested in seeing airline reports of health emergencies and deaths in the skies during 2021. Anyone have that available?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Are the @CDCgov (@CDCDirector; @RWalensky) and @US_FDA (@DrWoodcockFDA) really going to watch these vaccines get approval jammed through while dozens of scientists and statisticians with analyses pointing to substantial mortality are ignored---without any risk-benefit analysis?
That's what this looks like---the exact opposite of sound regulation. Can we just drop the facade that our regulatory agencies are distinct from pharmaceutical corporations?
@RWMaloneMD, @stephanieseneff, and others have been warning of antibody-dependent enhancement for a while. When presented with data, I said, "I don't think the statistics yet look like ADE. They're consistent with vaccines being more effective against mild cases...but...
When I see the inversion we're seeing in this chart, that tells me that there is a "change of state" in the system. What would cause the change of state? It's not just that the vaccines aren't working. That would be convergence of the graphs. But inversion may be the first sign.
I take that back for the moment...the chart should be normalized to (per million) or something like that. So, we're still heading toward convergence. I'm speaking too quickly, so forgive that...but my concern is growing, and for a real reason. The data tells a story.
This is not about casual narcissism suffered by people coddled a little much in childhood. This is about a more serious defect...
Have you ever read a news report about some man or woman who killed their kids or their whole family? Most all of us have, but perhaps we grimace with disgust, think "WTF", and quickly let the story drain from our minds. I did that for years.
But at some point, I read an article in an old anonymous blog called The Last Psychiatrist (worth looking up) that made me think deeper and read more. A personal experience made me dig even deeper...
I'm performing an analysis on what happens to CFR in nations after starting mass vaccination.
If somebody has time to work with me on this project who has excellent data handling skills, and can spare a couple of days, contact me.
In the meantime, I'm going to drop results...
India began mass vaccination Jan 16. CFR has gone up a bit. These are not mRNA vaccines. The rise in CFR may be that efficacy favors reducing milder cases more than the deadlier ones.
The U.S. (primarily mRNA) began mass vaccination Dec 21, 2020. CFR has been on the decline, but went up, and too quickly for the 12 day AB lag to build up in any significant part of the population.
1. Yesterday, I got a text from my favorite scaly statistician, @drrollergator and was all,
HAVE YOU SEEN HAAS ISRAELI DATA PAPER, OMG THIS IS DUM AND MISLEADING
So, I was like, "Saw it. Haven't had time to consume it. Fill me in."
2. So, the gator (who should probably be POTUS) jumped on zoom and started showing Bayesian analysis and he was like
FOR THIS AGE RANGE AND THAT AGE RANGE, THESE THINGS DON'T LOOK AS GOOD AS THEY SAY AND MIGHT LEAD TO OVERCONFIDENCE AND EVERYTHING IS DUMB
3. He further explained that even the relative risks took advantage of the declining infection curve since those vaccinated spent more time on average at the low end of the infection curve.