I know a lot of folks who started out in SEO, and are now in marketing leadership positions.

One challenge is that it’s hard to stay plugged in to SEO news, but you still have oversight of the SEO channel.

Does this sound like you? Here’s what you need to know:
As ever, there is a lot of bad information and rumour, so this is all based on the large number of tests we get to run @SearchPilot. Here's what Google is *really* doing:
1. JavaScript. Probably the biggest change of recent years.

Google *can* execute and index an awful lot of JavaScript (searchpilot.com/resources/case… )

BUT ...
Google's JavaScript execution is not perfect, it can cause organic search problems and underperformance through outright failing or through the fact that it takes a lot of resource so only top pages are prioritised:
searchpilot.com/resources/blog…
It does appear, though, that (in keeping with all the official line) a *lot* of it is to do with user experience. Where you upgrade the UX by using JS, search performance can IMPROVE:
searchpilot.com/resources/case…
2. The focus on user experience is no joke. Google really is serious about rewarding the best possible UX. In particular, they aren't kidding about interstitials harming organic search performance:
searchpilot.com/resources/case…
3. While we're talking about UX. You'll remember the "hidden content" shenanigans of yesteryear. The modern equivalent is text hidden in tabs etc. We've seen uplifts from bringing it out of tabs and making it visible: searchpilot.com/resources/case…
This is an especially big deal because of mobile-first indexing and the prevalence of tabs and accordions in mobile design.
4. Search result page (SERP) appearance makes a huge difference to actual clicks and traffic. This is one of the areas of most innovation from Google.
In light of recent changes where Google is choosing to rewrite more title tags in the SERP, we will be doing more testing in this area, because that title is one of the most influential elements on clickthrough rate.

Brand matters: searchpilot.com/resources/case…
And it's an area where experienced SEOs are most liable to screw up. It's *really* easy to make a strongly negative title tag change:
Exhibit A: searchpilot.com/resources/case…
Exhibit B:
searchpilot.com/resources/case…
It's quite possible that Google will get better at writing display titles than you are. They may already be better than you at writing meta descriptions because they can be query-specific: searchpilot.com/resources/case…
5. Structured data can move the needle, but a lot of the benefit is in having it when your competitors don't, so it's a bit of an arms race (or prisoner's dilemma, given it gives Google additional data):
searchpilot.com/resources/case…

and

searchpilot.com/resources/case…
6. Internal links are still really powerful and important, but misunderstood (context: searchpilot.com/resources/blog… )

some examples of things that have worked:
7. Content. Ahhhh. Content. Quality matters sometimes:

When it did: searchpilot.com/resources/case…

And when it seemed to be more about keywords on the page of any quality:
searchpilot.com/resources/case…
One thing that might not have been as true in times gone by: localising/localizing can make a major difference
searchpilot.com/resources/case…
And timeliness matters: searchpilot.com/resources/case…
8. And I'll end with some assorted and perhaps surprising results:

E-A-T might be real: searchpilot.com/resources/case…

That's one for the grizzled veterans to pull a sceptical face at.
Whether you believe it or not, our full funnel testing (CRO & SEO testing together) tends to show that it's a good idea to improve this kind of thing when measured across both channels. I don't think _that_ should be a surprise.

searchpilot.com/features/full-…
And who'd have predicted that HTML ordering would still be a thing in the third decade of the 21st century?

searchpilot.com/resources/case…
I don't know about you, but digging into surprising results and learning new things are what keep me interested in SEO after nearly 20 years.
Equally, if your job doesn't allow / require you to spend as much time in the weeds as you used to and you want to get the kinds of insights I've shared here, based on statistically-controlled tests, we have a low-volume email list for you:

marketing.searchpilot.com/seo-abtesting-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Critchlow

Will Critchlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @willcritchlow

3 Sep
I wanted to talk this week about one of the most advanced SEO subjects there is: internal linking
The big takeaways from our testing are:

1. Internal links are important (these tests are some of our most consistently statistically significant)

2. We have surprisingly often found big benefits to the pages where the links are added, not just to the targets of those links
3. In fact, we have seen cases where recipient page impacts were undetectable or even negative, while the linking pages saw a benefit

4. Some of our hardest-to-predict test results have also been internal linking tests!
Read 25 tweets
1 Sep
I found this article interesting: searchengineland.com/search-markete…

I'm not at all sure about the title (the power on the marketers' side is very distributed and subject to prisoner's dilemma-type issues) but the main article got me thinking in a few places. Most notably...
...being interested in @dannysullivan 's previous view that "I’ve wished for years that Google would let site owners have something like a “Yes, I’m really sure I want you to use my title tag” tag."

searchengineland.com/google-title-w…
Which led me to his recent discussion of the epiphany he has had on the subject since working at Google:
Read 4 tweets
22 Nov 19
I stopped complaining about the challenges with understanding how Google parses robots.txt and made (a version of) their open source parser available on the web instead: distilled.net/resources/free…
Stopped complaining *for now* I should say
My tool does have differences compared to the old search console one (because the SC one is wrong) and compared to the open source tool (because that doesn't capture all google crawler subtleties). I explain all in the post
Read 4 tweets
6 Feb 19
OK. Here we go - thread of answers to questions that came up during my #FOS19 presentation in Amsterdam today - about SEO / CRO / full funnel testing (read more here: distilled.net/resources/anno… ) cc @basvandenbeld
Q: how do you test the homepage of a website?

A: although you can run CRO tests on a homepage, SEO (and hence full funnel) tests require a site section with multiple pages with similar template. You can only really do before/after tests. [contd]
The techniques I described are mainly applicable to large websites with large site sections (e.g. ecommerce, real estate, travel, jobs, large brick+mortar chains etc). In these cases, most organic traffic is not to the homepage
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(