In 2015, the British Psychology Society submitted evidence to Maria Miller’s Transgender Equality Enquiry that male sex offenders have been known to falsely claim trans status as ‘female’.
https://twitter.com/ripx4nutmeg/status/1430209981203337223
Reasons for exploitation of GRA laws by predatory males included:
1. demonstrating reduced risk > parole
2. explaining their sex offending
3. separating from their sex offending self
4. better access to females and young children through presenting in an apparently female way.
1. demonstrating reduced risk > parole
2. explaining their sex offending
3. separating from their sex offending self
4. better access to females and young children through presenting in an apparently female way.
For years, many of us have foreseen how males who are not trans but who are violent, cynical predators will use the legal loophole created by selfID.
On the quoted thread by @ripx4nutmeg, someone asked (not verbatim): ‘What news story will make people wake up?’
I don’t know, because these cases seem to be studiously ignored by those arguing for selfID and housing in the female estate.
I don’t know, because these cases seem to be studiously ignored by those arguing for selfID and housing in the female estate.
I’m comfortable granting that, say, the disproportionate number of sexual crimes committed by transwomen are not ‘actual transwomen’ but ‘actual men pretending to be transwomen’.
The inability to collect accurate data on sex and criminality in these two demographics means we simply cannot discern between them.
That benefits precisely no-one except the ‘actual men pretending to be transwomen’.
That benefits precisely no-one except the ‘actual men pretending to be transwomen’.
‘Acceptance without exception’ is asking an awful lot of questions about an increasing number of Scotsmen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
