I spent the morning today visiting the processing center for Afghan evacuees outside Dulles Airport.
Several agencies were there: USAID, FEMA, the Army, and of course the State Department.
2000 more are expected today. More are coming.
Most are paroled into the US, with very unofficial documents clearly hastily created.
There are some US citizens, green card holders, and those with approved immigrant visas and Special Immigrant Visas (given to translators/allies)
And a lot of mixed status families.
There is very tight security (I only got in because I was connected to one of the other volunteer orgs.)
I'm told that once they leave, they're given the choice to go to a military base where there is legal support.
But there's no legal presence here at the processing center. These people need legal advice, not just accurate but TIMELY.
Many don't know they need advice. They're brand new. They're tired. They're desperate.
And they're the lucky ones. The ones who made it out.
It's great they're paroled, but what next? Do they even know the importance of taking care of their permanent legal status first? Do they know about the one year bar? What about unaccompanied minors? What about clearing up misinformation?
We've reactivated @DullesJustice - the #MuslimBan airport lawyer group. We built the rapid response legal team 4 years ago. No wheel reinventing.
I'm hopeful we can get clearance to help provide timely advice to these families.
I'll post as we get updates. In the meantime I want to highlight one small, local organization that's been there since Kabul fell: @HumanityHussein. Vetted by DOS, they've been working nonstop.
These are the orgs that can really help. They speak the language, they know the ppl.
Virulent Islamophobe and white nationalist sympathizer.
Pushes racist agenda under academic guise.
Thinks immigrant children should be sent to Guantánamo.
I've seen a lot of ink over the last two weeks attempting to explain the Taliban's lightning takeover of this beautiful country. Biden botched the withdrawal. Afghans are tribal. The Taliban wouldn't have been able to if they weren't popular. Pakistan enabled them.
I won't opine on the accuracy of these statements. People a lot smarter than I can duke it out. My calling is to help the traumatized and voiceless and take their stories to lawmakers to give them a voice. Same I did in Tijuana and Texas and at Dulles during the Muslim Ban.
I went to Dulles again on Sunday night when I found out a young Afghan had been detained there for nearly 3 days. No lawyer, no info. We dutifully filed our G-28's even though they're routinely ignored by CBP. (I've seen this movie before. A lot.)
As @Allandaros notes, the respondent in this case couldn't convince the court he didn't participate in the Rwandan genocide. Bad facts make bad law.
But the Board did something interesting, too.
It noted that equitable defenses like laches originate from the Constitution.
Article III, to be specific. Real courts have this authority: immigration "courts" don't qualify.
So when we talk about due process in imm courts, we mean creating courts pursuant to Constitutional authority. For immigration, that's Article I. fedbar.org/government-rel…
OK. This is a problem. As I said in 2019, "basic standards of journalistic integrity are that these organizations be properly contextualized as the white nationalist organizations that they are.”
These are the groups that enabled ppl like Stephen Miller.
.@DefineAmerican did a similar study covering 2014-2018 and found the same troubling trend: white nationalist organizations being given cover as a legitimate "other side" of the immigration debate.
WHITE NATIONALISTS ARE NOT LEGITIMATE. That's all.
*knock knock* hey @StephenM you listening? I'm the guy unsealing the #TantonPapers, the blueprint for the organizations that told you how to build your deportation machine.
I've been at this for over 4 years. Just wanted to share a little update!
Some quick background: John Tanton was the mastermind behind the largest and most effective anti-immigrant organizations in the US. Tied inextricably to the white nationalist movements, they've infiltrated deep into all levels of government and policy.
After 4 years, thanks to @isabelaalhadeff I finally got to see the "gift agreement" Tanton struck with UM. And it likely doesn't reach the level of an enforceable contract. Nothing more than a string of receipts. But here's the kicker:
After 4 years, I'm finally taking @UMich to trial.
Yesterday we propounded initial discovery. Item #1:
"PRODUCE: The Donor/Gift Agreement between Dr. Tanton and The University of Michigan/Bentley Historical Library."
Besides the papers themselves, this secret gift agreement is the most important piece of this puzzle. Why did Tanton want to keep his papers secret through 2035? How did they agree to only keep half of them closed, and why? Were there any other parties involved in the decision?
I had tried to request this secret agreement through FOIA in 2017, but UM denied it, saying we were parties to litigation. OK, fair enough. One of my colleagues tried to ask for it, and they denied her too, saying she was my agent and therefore a party to the litigation as well!