Virulent Islamophobe and white nationalist sympathizer.
Pushes racist agenda under academic guise.
Thinks immigrant children should be sent to Guantánamo.
Two-faced President of @NumbersUSA, the Tanton grasswork arm.
Fronts as a friend to black people whom he believes are hurt by immigration.
Says he is pro-immigrant.
Wrote a book called "The Case Against Immigration."
Once sent me a bag of gumballs in the mail.
4. Stephen Miller
Architect of the #MuslimBan, enemy to refugees, proponent of family separation. Mentored by @larryelder and David Horowitz. Relied on Tanton Network "data" to justify his Naziesque policies. Fan of @vdare white nationalist rag.
And there are more.
The organizations. The money. The bullhorn. The political pull.
Ask yourself: How stupid is the debate over Dreamers? Granting them citizenship is a no-brainer.
These organizations got us here. We waste time in inane debates, and never get reform.
They testify on the Hill. They're quoted by major media as a legitimate "oppositional" voice, their racist origins always shielded.
They cozy up with white nationalists, living and breathing off their hate.
And they're still making policy.
Let me say this publicly: Not a day goes by in my practice as an immigration lawyer that I don't run up against some policy crafted by these suited Klansmen.
Not a single day.
They're hard to write about because they play the long game, the slow burn, the 1000 paper cuts.
But we ignore them at our own peril. Immigration reform will continue to fail as long as they're poisoning the well.
I've seen a lot of ink over the last two weeks attempting to explain the Taliban's lightning takeover of this beautiful country. Biden botched the withdrawal. Afghans are tribal. The Taliban wouldn't have been able to if they weren't popular. Pakistan enabled them.
I won't opine on the accuracy of these statements. People a lot smarter than I can duke it out. My calling is to help the traumatized and voiceless and take their stories to lawmakers to give them a voice. Same I did in Tijuana and Texas and at Dulles during the Muslim Ban.
I went to Dulles again on Sunday night when I found out a young Afghan had been detained there for nearly 3 days. No lawyer, no info. We dutifully filed our G-28's even though they're routinely ignored by CBP. (I've seen this movie before. A lot.)
As @Allandaros notes, the respondent in this case couldn't convince the court he didn't participate in the Rwandan genocide. Bad facts make bad law.
But the Board did something interesting, too.
It noted that equitable defenses like laches originate from the Constitution.
Article III, to be specific. Real courts have this authority: immigration "courts" don't qualify.
So when we talk about due process in imm courts, we mean creating courts pursuant to Constitutional authority. For immigration, that's Article I. fedbar.org/government-rel…
OK. This is a problem. As I said in 2019, "basic standards of journalistic integrity are that these organizations be properly contextualized as the white nationalist organizations that they are.”
These are the groups that enabled ppl like Stephen Miller.
.@DefineAmerican did a similar study covering 2014-2018 and found the same troubling trend: white nationalist organizations being given cover as a legitimate "other side" of the immigration debate.
WHITE NATIONALISTS ARE NOT LEGITIMATE. That's all.
*knock knock* hey @StephenM you listening? I'm the guy unsealing the #TantonPapers, the blueprint for the organizations that told you how to build your deportation machine.
I've been at this for over 4 years. Just wanted to share a little update!
Some quick background: John Tanton was the mastermind behind the largest and most effective anti-immigrant organizations in the US. Tied inextricably to the white nationalist movements, they've infiltrated deep into all levels of government and policy.
After 4 years, thanks to @isabelaalhadeff I finally got to see the "gift agreement" Tanton struck with UM. And it likely doesn't reach the level of an enforceable contract. Nothing more than a string of receipts. But here's the kicker:
After 4 years, I'm finally taking @UMich to trial.
Yesterday we propounded initial discovery. Item #1:
"PRODUCE: The Donor/Gift Agreement between Dr. Tanton and The University of Michigan/Bentley Historical Library."
Besides the papers themselves, this secret gift agreement is the most important piece of this puzzle. Why did Tanton want to keep his papers secret through 2035? How did they agree to only keep half of them closed, and why? Were there any other parties involved in the decision?
I had tried to request this secret agreement through FOIA in 2017, but UM denied it, saying we were parties to litigation. OK, fair enough. One of my colleagues tried to ask for it, and they denied her too, saying she was my agent and therefore a party to the litigation as well!