Gen. Milley closed by telling the press that "this is personal to all of you."
That's...
Not good.
Yes, of course, reporters are people and care about the subjects of their stories.
But most important: DoD-beat reporters shouldn't become, even in part, DoD PIOs...1/
2/ They have & do, of course, which is part of the reason why we've seen 20 years of mostly unexamined failure in Afghanistan: that's a journalistic failure.
Milley and/or Secretary Austin said that the time for after-action/lessons learned studies wasn't now, but would come...
3/ I expect DoD will do those studies.
I'm much less confident (as in not at all) that the defense/national security press corps will do an analogous, urgently needed self-examination. The long-running Afghan failure was reportable. There are 11 IG reports to start with...
4/ The loud media shock at the collapse of the Afghan military/state is no expression of values. It's a reflection of 2 decades of journalistic malpractice. I'm listening to a reporter ("Elaine") complaining that we must now rely on negotiation w. the Taliban to get folks out...
5/ If, say, Elaine, had noticed that Donald Trump negotiated an unconditional surrender with the Taliban, including the release of 5000 Taliban prisoners, in exchange for unenforceable promises, coverage last year might have helped her and the US public get what's going on now...
6/ Now a WaPo reporter asks why we aren't retaking Bagram.
The DC permanent war caucus includes those reporters who most intensely cover the Nat Sec community. The failure of the Afghan "adventure" is their failure too, and we're seeing a ton of distraction and ass-covering /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm pretty sure that this is a take with a lot of problems. It's author, a fashion journalist, doesn't engage with the technical issues of modeling or calculating environmental impact, launching the story from one 3 y.o. study. She doesn't examine plastics carefully...1/
2/ Minor errors make me wonder about the bigger stuff. The exchange rate for $ to £ in 2007 is misstated, for example (2:1, rather than what Google tells me was ~1.4:1). Doesn't make the piece as a whole wrong, but it makes me wonder.
The larger issue...
3/ This is at bottom an environmental science story. You need to have an editor who gets that, to make sure a writer without the background of a environmental reporter gets the basic argument right. Better still, a reporter and an editor both versed in the beat, of course, but...
This is what happens when an elite consensus starts to fall apart. It's clear that the initial narrative on Afghanistan is both false & disbelieved by the broad audience on whom the DC media world ultimately depends
So you get stuff like this, written in a faux "street" style...
Noah Smith blocked me, alas, (after a not very nasty–IMHO–twitter exchange) so I can't engage with him directly but that doesn't stop me from saying that this is an interesting and useful essay. 2 quick reactions:
The first concerns this quote, which I think is exactly right:
2/ My only add to Smith's thought is that is exactly the position of elite DC media, exposed by their Afghanistan fail (and much else besides). They reject the criticism of outsiders (including really excellent journalists outside the DC nexus, and they have 1 great advantage...
3/ In that they buy ink by the barrel, enabling them to tell the world (&, importantly, each other) how immaculate is their work. But even so, there is, ISTM, a growing perception that "outsiders" are getting basic stories much more right than the nabobs of contemporary media...
2/ The short version: he argues that woke tech/creative elites have monopolized cultural power and both lock out and disdain white working class America, leading to violent right-wing revolutionary impulses that faux-populist scum like Trump exploit.
What's missing from that?...
3/ The sustained attack since Nixon (at least) on education, science etc., ramped up in recent years by the post-truth stylings of Murdoch's empire and much else besides. Resentment against current elites isn't some natural response to overweening incumbents...
2/ Conor often deploys that presumption of risibility in his dislikes, BTW, rhetorical red meat but bad argument. The larger issue though is his both siderism which assumes the weaponized anti-CRT crowd & the racism-is-pervasive side are equivalent in either argument or power..
3/ I'm trying to learn to leap into every fight I'm invited to (or not), but the two sides are not mirror images. Among other things, there is a wide range of different types of evidence that racism still plays a huge role in US daily life...
One last thought before I go: I can't tell you how the pandemic started. No one can. There is no dispositive evidence, and there is unlikely to be any for many years, if ever, given how long it has taken to track down previous new zoonotic diseases. 1/
2/ As Professor Tufekci put it, perhaps sharply, in an earlier reply tweet to me, it's a mistake to have too much certainty about probabilities. But it's important to be clear on what that necessary intellectual modesty actually requires...
3/ It means that we all need to do a lot of work. There are a series of specific steps required for a lab-escape scenario to actually occur. @beyerstein does a great job of detailing them here: newrepublic.com/article/162689….