Joe Biden is facing the most difficult test of his life. Already, he was subjected to the ire of most of the media and the entire military establishment for sticking to his guns and proceeding with the necessary withdrawal from Afghanistan. #Kabul_Airport
After today's depraved attack—killing at least 60, maybe more—Biden will face tremendous pressure to keep a large presence in Afghanistan, maybe even renew the Forever War and pursue regime change!
The MAGA whackjobs are emboldened by this attack and will pursue impeachment—which might actually get traction this time. The move would put Kamala Harris in office, of course, but it would warn any president off taking action against Washington's endless military campaigns.
We don't know who was behind the attacks, so what follows should be understood as speculation. That said, "cui bono?" certainly does give us the lay of the land.
The Taliban sponsoring such an attack would be like a quarterback, whose team is up by 5 points with only seconds remaining, declining to just kneel down and instead frantically running the ball into his own end zone. It simply makes no sense.
People jumping to blame the Taliban clearly view Muslims as deranged fanatics, solely bent on killing Americans in spectacular fashion, even when such attacks objectively harm their interest.
In other words, in this view, Muslim terrorism isn't even terrorism—which always has a political objective—it's shear murderous lunacy.
Would a rising Mujahideen—pleading for American support in op-eds in The Washington Post—be inclined to engage in such violence, and might they benefit from a renewed American presence? The answer is "yes."
Asking the question "Cui bono?" also leads us to understand how other powerful interests could benefit from today's terror bombing. But I'll leave following the logic to its end up to you.
I voted for Joe Biden, and he has exceeded my expectations. He is a good president and deserves steadfast support. Don't fall into the obvious traps laid before you—blaming him for partisan reasons or without thinking through the implications.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the Spring and Summer of civilizations, elites wear their elitism on the sleeves—announcing their status and taking responsibility. Winter brings an "Anti-Elite" to the fore, which evades and masks its status, indulges in self-loathing, and is captured by a death drive.
Was anyone at the #MetGala offended or outraged by this dress? Fearful that the masses are preparing an uprising? My guess is that many extremely wealthy people gave AOC compliments, high-fives, or even the "clinched fist" salute.
Calling the Met Gala attendees "limousine liberals" or "gauche caviar" misses the point—for they are not deluded, nor do they conceal themselves, for everyone sees through the charade. They are self-aware of the emptiness and nostalgia at the heart of slogans like "tax the rich."
He claims that I'm happy that Biden will be bringing in Afghan refugees, as this will serve my Al-Sharpton-esque race grifting. I've specifically addressed this issue. Moreover, it's the typical GOP/Trump shills—like Styxx—who are doing this—not me.
He then goes on to say that Trump should be given credit, not Biden. I did give Trump credit for setting the ball in motion. It was ultimately Biden who followed through. Whether Trump would have followed through is hypothetical, and "iffy" at best.
One thing I’ve noticed listening to some anti-vaxxers is that they’ll often talk about fertility concerns, sometimes going as far as claiming that the vaxxed are infertile or that being around vaccinated people can affect your mensuration cycle, etc.
To put my Freudian hat on: I think these false and bizarre claims are ways of confronting—and deflecting—a more general fertility angst. These claims might derive from a woman’s personal concerns over her biological clock, or worries about her children.
The American White population is not just growing at a slower pace than other races—it is in outright decline. I don’t think most anti-vaxxers know about this exact statistic, but I do think they feel it.
“Hungary” is beginning to function for American conservatives like “Sweden” does for leftists: it’s their “we just wanna be like” country. Both are fantasies of decline and shirking responsibilities; both are based on willful misunderstanding of the nature of the United States.
For decades, Bernie-style leftists made recourse to “we just want to be like Sweden” when accused of being “socialists.” They don’t want, they say, the iron misery of the Soviet Union, not to mention North Korea. They only want welfare, high taxes, and social cohesion.
Hungary, in turn, appears “fascist” only to the most shrill neoconservative journalists. It’s a quite, conservative country, where racial tension is absent, the gay agenda is stalled and decades behind the West, and the public buildings are grand.
I’m much less offended by a “vaccine passport,” like what’s happening in NYC, than this bizarre obsession with masking children.
Vaccines have clearly worked. The data on masks overall is a bit dubious, due to a number of factors.
I’m fully vaccinated, and I’m generally fine wearing a mask when I go shopping or whatever. The issue is children.
The silver lining of Covid-19 is that for children, it really is “just the flu.”
I understand transmission, but it’s too much to expect 6-10 year-olds to wear masks properly, keep them clean, etc. More important, the psychological/developmental damage of masking at school is serious—and seems to not be taken seriously by the CDC making these recommendations.
For goofball conservatives, like JD Vance, tweets like this are catnip—definitive proof that White liberals are “the real racists” or “the real classists” etc. All this proves is that conservatives hold the ideal of anti-racism as more important than life or death.
Why dismiss and condemn a proposal, which would likely save lives, just because it might reinforce a stereotype—and one that’s not even terribly demeaning. (I, too, love fried chicken; I’ve never understood how this stereotype is in anyway insulting to Blacks.)