Anyway, Canada was the first to have boots on the ground during the 2004 coup in Haiti —making way for US troops to get into the country “safely.”This was always known, but more info came out about it this year.
“on February 29, 2004, Canadian special forces secured Haiti’s airport while Aristide was flown out of the country on a U.S. plane. Soon after, Canadian RCMP officers were training and vetting the newly reconstituted Haitian National Police.”
Side Note: Canada frequently “trains” police forces in the Caribbean. And in the 1970s and 1980s, Canadian training of violent state forces in the region was very extensive, given the “threat” of Black Power Movements 🙃
“Canada played a key role in planning and building the rationale for the overthrow of Haiti’s government in 2004…Canada hosted officials from the French and U.S. governments and the OAS and EU to discuss the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine”
“In the aftermath of the meeting, internal briefings reveal Canadian govt anxiously monitored reactions to an article published in l’Actualité, the only article in the Canadian media that reported discussions to “overthrow Aristide” and “put Haiti under UN trusteeship.””
“The government came up with talking points to deny the claims… Over the next year, the “Ottawa Initiative on Haiti” would involve other secretive meetings with the Bush admins Dept and meetings by several branches of the Canadian govt where they discussed “worst case scenarios”
“with US and French representatives… The Canadian govt had been centrally involved in developing and popularizing R2P, but was eventually stalled by scepticism among Global South countries at the UN in 2009, after widespread criticism that it served as a pretext for overriding”
“national sovereignty and engaging in “humanitarian imperialism.” … At their peak, Canadian forces in Haiti would number 500 troops (including an infantry company, a helicopter detachment and support personnel) and 100 police officers.”
““Haiti is an international crime scene, and the criminals get away with it because their populations are not aware of how foreign policy of the U.S., France and Canada get implemented in places like Haiti.””
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In reading about post-disaster-reconstruction in Haiti, I did consult this book on New Orleans which also experiences same outsourcing + privatisation dynamics post a disaster event (like a hurricane). Sharing given #HurricaneIda — where same dynamics will come into play
People trying to assert China as a colonising / imperialist force in Africa + Caribbean keep using this (“infrastructure doesn’t mean imperialism isn’t happening”) as a retort to people pointing out their misunderstanding of imperialism + colonialism reads as empire apologia 🤢
Under direct colonial rule, empires “infrastructure” were only done for the purposes of extraction from the colony + ease of military control in the country (sole purpose: extraction + control). In too many instances, this meant that the “infrastructure” built was not useful
for ppl suffering + living under colonialism & later on imperial overreaches. This isn’t including the fact that afterwards, it was largely inaccessible & if good infrastructure was left by European empires, “development” + lack of access post “independence” wouldn’t be issues
Why the occupation in Haiti isn’t talked about as such, even though Haiti’s occupation is co-signed by “international community” + Western states who use Haiti to launch off other imperialist aggression in the region:
“Because Haiti is Haiti. Because Haiti is Black” and to acknowledge this would be to talk about white supremacy, occupation, etc — Jemima Pierre
People saying “yes,” China is “colonizing” or “imperialising” Africa really just don’t know what imperialism or colonialism means. But, they’re super confident inserting themselves in these convos making loud + wrong (can’t be substantiated) proclamations about their *beliefs*
So that in large part, explains much of the back be forth, and also why people are putting China on equal footing with countries that have actually pillaged + directed state policy in African countries for centuries + continue to sanction said countries if orthodoxy is bucked
coming to that realisation is sad — since you would assume people talking about imperialism or colonialism actually knows what it is — but then again, it also explains why actual research will never be sufficient to some people that have been victims of western propaganda,
Highlighting Canada’s activities in global south to inform “Canada nice” liberals + leftists: “Foreign companies from a range of countries compete in Africa's mining sector. But according to a number of measures, those from one country dominate: Canada.”
“Kneen explains that while countries such as the US have passed domestic laws that govern corporations' activities abroad, Canada has not done the same. The current Conservative government has actually voted down several attempts to increase accountability abroad.”
Canadian banks also benefit from lack of regulation abroad— and that fact occupied a big part of my dissertation analysis. One of the most cynical things about Canadian financial practices is that when they screw over Canadians in Canada, they face some regulation— BUT