I don't know how to end this thread, except to say that I am scared and sad, but ever more resolute.
Even if institutions are captured at some levels, more and more ordinary people are standing up and speaking up.
Adding to the thread
A clarification: Julie Bindel reported that she was verbally abused, lunged at and almost punched in the face, by a transwoman while leaving an Edinburgh Uni event
April 2021: Australia Academic Dr Holly Lawford-Smith sets up website where women can share how women’s only spaces have been impacted by pro-transgender policies. Supporters are verbally abused and have water thrown at them at Melbourne Uni
The @fawcettsociety 's new code of conduct isquite pointed (and authoritarian)
Section 1 "women and girls in all their diversity" is code for gender id
Section IV suggests @ ing a Trustee could be grounds for expulsion
OLD--> --> NEW
Members have not been invited to vote on the new code of conduct which means that members must not disagree with the replacement of sex by gender.
And public debate will not be tolerated.
Obviously harassment is harassment, but being on Twitter is an invitation to be @'ed into conversations by strangers -- and being a Trustee or senior manager of an NGO seeking to influence policy is being a public figure.
As the foreword notes Robin Moira White has an obvious personal interest in laws and rules that would make it difficult for women to say no sharing single sex spaces with males
Nevertheless claim to have set out the law as it currently is, and not just wishful thinking....
From the Easy Reading version of the Welsh LGBTQ+ Action Plan consultation
- it is so unsafe to tell people they cannot trust their own eyes about who is a man and who is a woman.
Queer means..... ? (I still don't know)
And as for the plus...?
Here is the not easy reading version - it still doesn't make clear why people "wanting to reject specific labels" should need to be the business of the state.