The @FawcettSociety 's new code of conduct isquite pointed (and authoritarian)
Section 1 "women and girls in all their diversity" is code for gender id
Section IV suggests @ ing a Trustee could be grounds for expulsion
OLD--> --> NEW
Section 1 "women and girls in all their diversity" is code for gender id
Section IV suggests @ ing a Trustee could be grounds for expulsion
OLD--> --> NEW
Members have not been invited to vote on the new code of conduct which means that members must not disagree with the replacement of sex by gender.
And public debate will not be tolerated.
And public debate will not be tolerated.
Obviously harassment is harassment, but being on Twitter is an invitation to be @'ed into conversations by strangers -- and being a Trustee or senior manager of an NGO seeking to influence policy is being a public figure.
If I as a Fawcett Member respond publicly on Twitter to a Fawcett Trustee in her work-life writing about me that is seen as an attack, and presumably grounds for expulsion
https://twitter.com/ayeshahazarika/status/1405193997828698113?lang=en
Being on social media was part of the job description for Fawcett CEO
But when women responded to Felicia Willow she called "pile on" and left Twitter for good
There was no pile on
But when women responded to Felicia Willow she called "pile on" and left Twitter for good
There was no pile on
https://twitter.com/Forthebeats1/status/1388576270229852166
The careerocrats running "civil society" orgs are driving gender self ID by the back door, resisting accountability & transparency through punitive social media policies.
And campaigning for govt & media platforms to protect us all from upsetting language "for our own good."
And campaigning for govt & media platforms to protect us all from upsetting language "for our own good."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
