Some drill-down into the survey I ran several weeks ago about CRT/I opinions in the SBC. I'll try to release some factoid daily until I run out. Here's a link to the question-by-question results again. forms.office.com/Pages/Analysis…
Today's tweet correlates how people felt about Resolution 9 (Question 34 on the survey) with how people felt about the helpfulness of CRT/I (Question 28).
Some people responded that "Everything anyone says using these theories is wrong." This is the utter rejection of the idea that even a broken clock is right twice a day. CRT/I, according to this group, isn't even ever ACCIDENTALLY right about ANYTHING. 94 respondents agreed.
Of those 94, 11 (or a little more than 1 in 10) answered that they were glad that Resolution 9 passed in 2019.
Another 176 people agreed that "If anyone says anything right using these theories, it is accidental and unimportant." This is still a strong rejection of CRT/I, of course. Of those, 21 (about 12%) were glad that Resolution 9 passed in 2019.
There were 147 respondents who agreed that "It's rare, but sometimes these theories teach us something worthwhile." At this point, we start to encounter people who are affirming the most controversial statement of Resolution 9, that it could ever be a helpful analytical tool.
Still, these 147 folks are very suspicious of CRT. Back home they'd be the folks saying that even a blind hog finds an acorn every once in a while.

37% of them were glad that Resolution 9 passed in 2019.
A whopping 558 people agreed that "These theories have a mixed record, yielding some good ideas and some bad ones depending upon who is using them." They were 74% glad that Resolution 9 passed in 2019.
There were 71 people who agreed that "These theories are basically correct, although sometimes people apply them wrongly." They were 85% in support of Resolution 9 in 2019.
The remaining 8 responses were the people who were all-in on CRT/I, agreeing that "These theories are the most accurate way available to understand race in our society." They were 75% glad that Resolution 9 passed in 2019.
Now, what's interesting to me are the MINORITIES in these categories that I just mentioned to you. If you take into account just the public Twitter debate, you'd expect question 28 to be a very reliable predictor of how anyone answered question 34.
In other words, people who can't admit to the possibility that CRT/I ever lead to the right understanding of anything would likely be unhappy with the passage of Resolution 9, while people who think these theories are at least occasionally right would be pro-Resolution-9.
Who are these people who buck the trend?

Let's look first at the 12% who chose one of the first 2 responses to question 28 but affirmed Resolution 9. These are people who are very skeptical about CRT/I.
My first guess was that these were people who were glad that Resolution 9 passed because, in their view, it revealed a problem that they are now addressing. But looking further, that seems unlikely.
After all, of those who gave highly negative responses about the usefulness of CRT/I but who affirmed Resolution 9, not a single one said that they think the SBC has embraced CRT.
Instead, I think these are people who believe (as I do) that the actual wording of Resolution 9 is quite skeptical of CRT/I, too. In other words, more than 1 in 10 of those who have the highest skepticism of CRT/I think Resolution 9 was negative enough toward these theories.
Then, on the other side, of the people who are open to the use of CRT/I, even if they expect it to be wrong more than it is right, more than a third of them wish Resolution 9 had not passed.
I'm guessing that these folks are expressing one of two feelings: Either, like the other 12% we just discussed, they think that Resolution 9 is quite skeptical of CRT/I or they just regret all of the controversy that has ensued.
23% of those who are not glad Resolution 9 passed but believe that CRT/I can sometimes be helpful have considered leaving the SBC over dissatisfaction about how we handle race or racial reconciliation. I wonder whether these wish Resolution 9 were more affirming of CRT.
That leaves 350 people who, I'm guessing, just hate the mess.
I've tried to employ the word "guess" liberally where I know that I'm going beyond the data. Apologies to @mhenslee and @Jonathan_Howe for the lengthy tweet thread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bart Barber

Bart Barber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bartbarber

1 Sep
Today's data from the CRT/I polling I did earlier: Let's look at the people who said "I endorse (and perhaps even teach) Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality."

These are self-identified proponents of CRT/I. What can we learn about them?
94% of the self-identified proponents of CRT/I also DENIED that "every white person is a racist, just by virtue of being white," (although I've heard many friends say that this is a core teaching of CRT/I).
59% of the pro-CRT respondents DENIED that "when it comes to the topic of racism, we should listen to what black people have to say and not listen to what white people have to say." Again, many friends have suggested that this is a core teaching of CRT/I.
Read 14 tweets
30 Aug
I don't know whether you guys have already read or listened to this story from @WIRED, but it is fascinating. It's about COVID, and it explains a lot of why we've heard the recommendations we have, but it's also relevant elsewhere wired.com/story/the-teen…
In particular, I find it worth sharing at the beginning of the academic year in order to underscore why citation of sources is so important in academic work (as opposed to your letter to Mom or other kinds of writing).
Often attribution of sources is framed in terms of giving proper credit to other authors...a matter of personal integrity. But there's another aspect to this that is often more important and that is specific to academic writing.
Read 7 tweets
25 Aug
I do not subscribe to any liturgical calendar because of the aggregation of these realities…
1. Liturgical calendars are extrabiblical: The Old Testament gives us a different annual calendar and the New Testament gives us only a weekly calendar.
2. They are confining: if the text and the Spirit so lead, I will preach on the incarnation in June, the resurrection in February. I will fast in December if the life of discipleship brings me there.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul
I appreciated my conversation with @bobsmietana today as a part of his research for this story. From one angle, it is interesting as a part of the conflict over race in American Evangelicalism. religionnews.com/2021/07/20/dav…
From another angle, the polity issues here highlight issues that more than one church is facing. Most normative-sized churches can manage issues over who may and may not vote just by looking around. The members know who the members are, and non-member voting becomes apparent.
That aspect of congregationalism becomes more difficult as churches scale up in size. Having multiple sites only increases that difficulty.
Read 6 tweets
20 Jul
I thought I'd take a moment to comment upon this video of @plattdavid addressing a moment of disunity at @mcleanbible.

I do so because I write sometimes on the subject matter of polity. Public moments like this are teachable moments.
I am a committed congregationalist. I am thankful that McLean Bible Church practices congregationalism—that affirmation of pastors/elders/overseers requires congregational approbation.
Read 11 tweets
19 Jul
In the Southern Baptist Convention, our churches’ commitment to closed communion, congregationalism, and religious liberty are clearly waning. Warning signs are all around.

But nobody is hashtagging #downgrade about that, and nobody is trying to #taketheship over that.
And yet these things are both in the Bible and in the Baptist Faith & Message.

Critical Race Theory, on the other hand, isn’t spreading in SBC churches like these things, isn’t in the Bible, and isn’t in the Baptist Faith & Message.

But it IS on cable TV news channels.
And it’s THAT THING—the news channel thing instead of the Bible things—that has created a takeover movement in the SBC.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(