Shocked about Pharmally, the contractor under Senate investigation?

@covidbudgetph flagged items:
3x - 52x typical govt contract prices
9x - 66x typical market prices
P319 M - P550 M savings if items bought at typical prices (Mar-Aug 2020 sample)

Senate, COA, please check.🧵
1/ The sad news is: it's likely not just Pharmally.

As we wrote in this thread, the risks are systemic.

These can only be addressed through a better system of social accountability to proactively monitor national procurement + improve data quality.

2/ To illustrate:

Two-thirds, or P13 B of P20 B, of our sample did not have sufficient specifications or descriptions.

This means we can't even compare price or quality for majority of goods bought w our tax money.

Still, we found items bought 3x the typical prices.
3/ Public contracts should be specified correctly so our taxes are spent well.

CONCENTRATION RISK makes this even more important.

The top 10 of 435 suppliers represented 66% of our sample value as of August 3, 2020.

Pharmally topped this list. Here are other big contractors.
4/ There were three suppliers in our sample with foreign addresses which had high-value transactions worth at least P300 million as of August 3, 2020.

These suppliers represented more than a tenth of the value of emergency procurement as of August 3, 2020.
5/ Even among procuring entities that had published their contracts as of August 3, 2020:

The top 10 accounted for P18 billion or 88% of total sample value.

The Department of Budget and Management Procurement Service (DBM-PS): P14 billion or 70% of total sample value.
6/ These procuring entities have a lot of selling power. These contractors have a lot of buying power.

These powers affect how price and quality are negotiated during emergency procurement.

A resilient procurement system urgently delivers goods while preventing abusive behavior
7/ We saw lots of possibly overpriced items:

Here's a list of items where taxpayers could have saved at least P10 million if they had been bought at typical market prices.

Can't conclude fraud because of limited available docs. But this analysis can help prioritize w/c to check
8/ So what can we do?

First, procuring entities should better specify the items they buy with our tax money, and upload these contracts online.

In our team's review of contracts as of August 3, 2020; only 205 procuring entities, or a tenth of agencies, had uploaded contracts.
9/ When we checked the document quality of our sample contracts using a 15-step method, we found:

Most contracts also had missing basic information, inconsistent amounts, broken weblinks, or unclear data or signature in the uploaded documents.
10/ Many transactions had inconsistent or missing dates or times across their uploaded documents.

The publicly available documents we checked were the purchase orders, notices of award, and annual procurement plans.
11/ Some transactions had significant typographical or mathematical errors and differences in amounts across the documents they uploaded.

There were some suspended suppliers which were allowed to bid. But these suppliers' transactions had been canceled last time we checked.
12/ The good news is we also found contracts with model supporting documents.

Here are:
a model purchase order (PO) from @BangkoSentral
a model annual procurement plan (APP) from @BangkoSentral
a model notice of award (NOA) from the Department of Agriculture
13/ Second, civil society can organize to use some of the methods we use in this paper, to build a movement to monitor and systematically improve the quality of our public procurement data.

We have to watch procurement with the same rigor and vigor as our elections.
14/ Third, we should heed lessons from grassroots accountability organizers on how we pool demand and make bulk orders, how we specify contracts, and how we mitigate price gouging.

We summarize in our paper all the literature we've read on @opencontracting in the Philippines.
15/ Finally, we invite journalists, students, auditors, oversight bodies, procuring entities, and contractors to:

Study our dataset of P20 billion COVID-19 government contracts, which we've uploaded for public use: bit.ly/phlcovidcontra…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ken Abante | Open doors + windows vs COVID

Ken Abante | Open doors + windows vs COVID Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KenAbante

12 Jul
PRESIDENT DUTERTE HAS ABANDONED US.

FITCH'S NEGATIVE CREDIT RATING OUTLOOK is the direct result of Duterte's political leadership that has lost touch with the everyday realities of our suffering people.
1/ President Duterte and his top appointed officials have failed to listen and learn from their deadly blunders which caused this negative outlook.

Duterte's deadliest blunder is a 2021 budget that has set us up to fail in managing this pandemic.
2/ Duterte's 2021 budget is a budget that kills. Duterte put pork barrel and bullets first, and has given very little cash aid to families to encourage people to test, trace, isolate, treat, and prevent COVID-19 surges.
Read 21 tweets
11 Jul
I'm turning 29, wow.

The past year has been the hardest time of my life.

Since my loved ones who are front liners could not get their PPEs from the government last year, I have spent almost all of my time working or volunteering with communities on COVID-19 response efforts.
We've organized efforts in public budgeting, public transport and mobility, FOI, and in our local COVID-19 prevention, testing, monitoring, and vaccination programs.

I witness everyday the miracle of engaged citizenship: the power of everyday people working for everyday change.
If you'd like to support these movements, please consider making a donation to:

1. @covidbudgetph, so we can fight for a better National Budget in 2022 that truly funds COVID-19 efforts, and not Congress's pork barrel like this 2021 Budget. Please send me a PM if game to donate.
Read 5 tweets
18 May
[DOWNLOAD: Philippine Open Covid Contracts Dataset v1]

We (@wesolveph @covidbudgetph @HivosROSEA)
are releasing for public use our study+dataset+code on P20 billion worth of covid-related government contracts in the Philippines.

Grateful for feedback.

wesolve.ph/research/stren…
1/ Our open contracting dataset covers:
- 581 contracts with 120 variables
- 2,832 items with 11 variables
- worth P20 billion (60% of value of publicly available contracts as of 3 Aug 2020)
- internal + market prices
- code for price analysis
- raw files
- data documentation
2/ We used this Philippine Open Covid Contracts Dataset in our @wesolveph @covidbudgetph @HivosROSEA research:

"Strengthening Procurement in the Time of a Pandemic: Evidence from the Philippines"

with @golaurencego @ishqmeraki J. Ramos @reina_reyes E. Rosales @joseruedatweets
Read 12 tweets
24 Jul 20
[THREAD: DO WE HAVE CASH TO FIGHT COVID-19?]

INSIGHT 1: YES, WE HAVE CASH TO FIGHT COVID-19.

As of end-June 2020, gov't raised P3 trillion in cash from revenues (A) and debt (C). Gov't "spent" P2 trillion (B).

Net cash raised (A+C-B) is P988 billion.
2/n

1.1. We should thank our career officials for raising P3 T in cash:
P1.45 T is from tax and non-tax revenues
P1.55 T is financing from domestic (80%) and external (20%) sources

Borrowing cash is okay as long as:
1. We need the money. We do.
2. We can pay it back. We can.
3/n

1.2. Gov't spent P3 T in cash. P410 B of this is cash transferred to LGUs' bank accounts.

We urge LGUs to follow Gumaca, Quezon's example and report COVID-19 spending. In the last President's Report (June 29) only P5.5 B of P37 B in Bayanihan LGU Grants is reported spent.
Read 17 tweets
16 Jun 20
[THREAD: WHAT DOES CHANGING THE SYSTEM MEAN?]

1/ All of us want to "change the system". But my teachers and mentors taught me early on that changing the system is often NOT A GLAMOROUS, FLASHY act.

It's a A SERIES OF BORING DAILY ACTS of citizenship.
2/ First, it means LISTENING to others and knowing who they are and what they need. It means suspending judgment so there is a safe space for dialogue.

Systems change only lasts with the support and inclusion of people. It starts with a genuine desire to LISTEN.
3/ Second, it means LISTENING to ourselves and BEING AWARE of our strengths and limitations. This is an EVERY DAY question we live out.

How much time can we commit? What skills and networks can we contribute? What privileges and biases do we have? Where do our ethical lines lie?
Read 17 tweets
24 May 20
[THREAD: On moving people, not cars]

1/ I recall my own "conversion" from the moving cars to the moving people perspective in public transport.

It was uncomfortable. I had to admit that whenever I rode a private car, I was slowing down other commuters who took public transport.
2/ My riding a car slowed down the poor: 88 percent of households cannot afford a car. My riding a car also slowed down other cars. My riding a car slowed down EVERYONE.
3/ I had to admit I was wrong. That I made a mistake. That my earlier view of measuring traffic as the flow of cars, and not as the flow of people, was anti-poor.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(