The official word has become that the State Museum did not follow MO state law in securing permissions to display the exhibit and that's why it was taken down. I am not convinced by this explanation. /2
First, as the @MO_Independent reports, meeting minutes of the board in question show that no exhibit has ever needed state approval before. /3
@MO_Independent So, if procedure is the only issue, I’d like to know when the state museums plans to secure those necessary permissions and display Making History. /finis
According to reports, a handful of Republican staffers & legislatures @MoGov statehouse pressured the @mohistorymuseum to remove an exhibit on #KansasCity’s #LGBTQ History. I helped curate the exhibit. Here’s what you need to know. /1
@MoGov@mohistorymuseum The exhibit is called “Making History: Kansas City & the Rise of Gay Rights.” It documents how in 1966 early gay rights activists met in KC in what became the first national LGBTQ meeting. You can read the exhibit here. /2
@MoGov@mohistorymuseum The exhibit is a work of scholarship. It was curated by students in my @UMKC “Public History” class in 2016 & was intended to raise awareness about a new marker installed in downtown KC commemroating the 1966 meeting. /3
I observed my TAs leading discussion sections today in my US History survey. The topic was the New Left & identity politics, & among the things they had to read was SDS’s Port Huron statement. The student’s responses were fascinating. /1
After the TA had discussed the document & it’s contexts, I interjected to ask if the students found the Port Huron statement relevant at all. It was written by people like you, I noted. College students wanting to bring a new world into being. /2
The students, however, were unanimous in that the found the document uninspiring & distant. They couldn’t say why, but when I asked what might be in their Port Huron Statement, and their answers were super revealing. /3