A majority of the world will speak English by the end of the century. This will create a new global identity. It will be the triumph of the Anywheres.
Why? Because the same mechanic happened in the past.
Here's what happened and what will happen next 🧵
Up to the 1500s, languages were not differentiated like today. In places like Europe, there were vernacular gradients, from Wallonia to Lisbon, from London to Vienna.
That's because most ppl didn't communicate with those far away from their village.
The only ones who did communicate across Europe were the Catholic Church, who could do that because they had a single language, Latin.
Then came the printing press, printed in the local vernacular of the biggest cities. As more and more ppl read that vernacular, more and more ppl read it.
By the time the 19th and 20th century broadcasting systems appear, that movement accelerates: newspapers, radio, TV, education create one language to rule them all—within a nation-state.
Let's summarize: the predominant vernacular became the lingua franca of a nation-state, because of network effects: +ppl speak it, so +ppl write in it, so +ppl read it... And this process happened nation-states emerged.
Now, which is the vernacular of the 21st century globalized world?
Which is the vernacular that most non-natives are learning?
Which is the vernacular that most non-natives are learning, representing this unstoppable force of worldwide language spread?
Which is, as a result, the language that's growing the fastest?
So let's summarize:
Printing press ➡️ spreads local vernaculars that become national languages and create national sentiment as a side-effect
Internet ➡️ spreads English that becomes global language and creates a global identity.
What it means is:
- Unstoppable spread of English
- More international fraternalism
- Fewer international conflicts (but maybe more fraternal ones, based on ideas rather than geographies)
- More exchange of ideas
- More economic growth
And in depth in the examples of the printing press and broadcasting media here
Follow and subscribe as I develop these themes. Coming next: how specifically the nation-state will be undermined, the impact of automation, technologies of violence, and more
If you catch COVID, the risk of developing COVID Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are 3,000x higher than those of suffering a bad vaccine side-effect. That illness can leave you out of work and energy for the rest of your life.
The most long-lasting part of Long COVID is likely Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, which so far has no cure and can last decades.
Your likelihood of catching it from COVID is ~2-3%, and it's worse for young ppl than old ppl
Long COVID is confusing until we realize its most alarming outcome is *Chronic Fatigue Syndrome* (CFS).
What does CFS look like?
Is it like Long COVID? 🧵
This is a person with CFS. At 24, she had spent nearly a decade without putting her feet on the ground.
This is @jenbrea suffering from post-exertional malaise, from her documentary Unrest, which you can watch on Netflix (the 3 clips come from the documentary)
This is Whitney, who hasn't talked for years. His father:
“Whitney’s state is comparable to an AIDS patient about a week before his death. And that has been the case for the last six years.”
The idea is to create a cohort-based course with live lectures. I am still debating whether it should be about 1. How to solve any problem 2. Advanced product and growth mgmt
Over my career managing billion-dollar tech products with hundreds of millions of users, studying storytelling, and writing COVID and Uncharted Territories articles, I've come to think the biggest pbm of mankind is that we don't know how to make decisions.
I want to solve that.
The 3-week course would include frameworks, lectures, and more importantly, workshops so you can bring pbms to the table and we can work to solve them together, learning decision-making along the way.
According to Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, write-ups. But I never understood it until very recently.
Bezos defends why writing is better. Ironically, his write-up has all the flaws that he complains about in powerpoints:
“The narrative structure of a good memo forces better thought and better understanding of what's more important than what, and how things are related”
Ok so his hypothesis: idea importance and interconnectedness are crucial, but write-ups achieve them better.
Why?
“Ppt-style presentations somehow give permission to gloss over ideas, flatten out any sense of relative importance, and ignore the interconnectedness of ideas.”
Ok 3 causes. W/ ppt, ppl:
-gloss over ideas
-don’t make idea importance obvious
-ignore their connection
Becoming the best in the world at some skill is nearly impossible. There's always somebody stronger than you, cleverer than you, with better genetics, who worked harder...
The more you work on standing out in a domain, the more you face these phenomenal competitors.
That's why becoming the best in the world at something takes too much work.
It's nearly impossible to be the best, but it's quite easy to be in the top 10% or so.