Streamline Pictures was founded by two animation-fans-turned-pros who wanted anime to be mainstream in America. Their first U.S. theatrical release was Castle In The Sky.
In 1989, they distributed Akira and Lensman. One is considered a classic, the other mostly forgotten.
In Japan, Lensman was extremely influential. A quick search of shmuplations.com reveals that Gradius' aesthetic was heavily inspired by Lensman, and Capcom's Akiman was "obsessed."
But in America, people who saw Lensman right after seeing Akira were not as impressed.
There are many possible reasons why Lensman has been forgotten, but the biggest factor is that it hasn't been available since Laserdisc.
The reasons why it's unavailable is surrounded in rumor and myth, and taking up way too much space in my head. So here's a braindump thread.
Lensman began in 1937 as a story called "Galactic Patrol" serialized in Astounding magazine before being collected as a series of books starting in...well, it's complicated.
Bits of it seeped in to later sci-fi stories, consciously or subconsciously, such as Star Wars.
When Star Wars got big in Japan, several animation studios bought the rights to some of the old pulp stories that reportedly inspired George Lucas.
Captain Future (1978) was relatively faithful, but Lensman (1984) was heavily reworked into a Star Wars clone.
When I say Star Wars clone, I mean that the main character was changed from an experienced highly-trained adult into an inexperienced farm boy. The strong female character dresses in white and was given a Leia bun, but only one, so it's not the same at all, right?
The farm boy inherits his lens from a dying Lensman in a crashed ship.
Which is hilarious because it's the origin of the Silver Age Green Lantern, whose Green Lantern Corps "space police" concept was basically a lift of the Galactic Patrol. Who at the studio was reading GL?
Creator E.E. Smith didn't live to see this. He died in 1965.
His estate was run by science fiction fan (and his daughter) Verna Smith Trestrail. But the Japanese studio hadn't involved her in the project. When she saw the final product at the 1984 LA Wondercon, she was livid.
How did this happen? Well, after original publisher Fantasy Press folded in 1955, the books went out of print, then E.E. Smith made a deal with Pyramid Books, who released them as paperbacks around 1964.
Pyramid was folded into Berkley Publishing around 1979.
What Smith's estate apparently didn't realize (and maybe even Smith himself), is that Pyramid/Berkley had been granted exclusive licensing rights across all media. So Mitsuru Kaneko of MK Company licensed the movie rights through Berkley.
Did Verna Smith Trestrail try to sue Berkley? That I'm unclear on. I'm also unclear on why the paperback books suddenly went out of print some time after 1987. Rumor is that she "pulled" the rights, but it doesn't really work that way. Maybe it expired and she refused to renew.
Regardless of what went down between Berkely and Smith's daughter, MK Company retained the rights to the movie. Which is how Streamline Pictures was able to create a dub in 1989, and release it on VHS and LD.
They even licensed an adaptation/spin-off to a US comic company!
Oh, Verna was a new form of livid over this twist. How can a Japanese movie company license the rights back to a US book company?
To be more specific, MK Company licensed it to Harmony Gold (a US company who did a TV dub in 1987 before Streamline Pictures did their own in 1989), who licensed it to Eternity Comics, an imprint of Malibu Comics. Whew.
But it sounds like all Verna could do — according to what the artist heard from his editor — was prevent them from using anything from the books that wasn't already in the movie or show. timeldred.com/lensman1990/
Oh right, I forgot to mention there was a 25-episode show right after the movie! Let's hit pause for now and continue this tomorrow. This was a productive braindump.
Just to be clear, Nintendo's Zelda wasn't blonde until a few games into the series. And Miyamoto says her name was proposed by some PR person who was thinking of F. Scott Fitzgerald's wife Zelda.
Still, it makes you wonder about her later looks.
Galactic Patrol was a spin-off from the movie that used the same character designs but didn't take place in the same continuity. It was slightly more in-line with the books (the Green Lantern origin is gone), but also adds a little Star Trek (like a bridge w/ a Captain's chair).
The only thing I don't like about the word "Metroidvania" is that it falsely gives appearance that Castlevania contributed as much to the genre as Metroid, if only "Metroidvania" didn't sound so much cooler than "Metroid-like."
But I think I've figured out a solution...
What if we just called everything a "-vania"? Okay, maybe not literally everything, but if we could popularize just two other "-vania" genres, the suffix "-vania" would essentially shift to just mean "-like"!
Would you rather play a Roguelike, or a Roguevania?
Pac-Mania? Maybe the maze-chase genre should be called Pac-Vanias!
Kart racers? More like...Kartvanias!
All '90s shooters formerly called Doom-clones are now Doomvanias!
So I guess Shang-Chi is going to be the movie that breaks my 10-year stretch of seeing every MCU movie in the theater. FOMO isn't enough to outweigh the possibility of a breakthrough infection.
I don't even like theaters, I only go to the theater to see these out of FOMO.
When I went to see Black Widow, Cinemark had multiple "trailers" that were like "aren't you glad the movie theater experience back??" and I was like "NOPE! (But this was cheaper than digital!)"
I'd consider $20, but $30 is too much for me to watch solo. (They're probably imagining a group pooling money to watch.)
Originally my Easter Eggs video was going to be twice as long, and include mention of "Make Love Not War" as well as how the term "Easter Egg" invaded non-computer media, but the lack of info about "Make Love Not War" felt anti-climatic. acriticalhit.com/ready-player-o…
If you grew up in the late '80s or early '90s, you probably remember playing The Oregon Trail on an Apple II. But why were Apple IIs so popular with schools? I've seen a lot of explanations, but they always seem like they're missing...something?
I set out in search of sources that confirmed Apple IIs were the most frequently bought, hoping they'd tell me why. Apple set up a permenent "Education Purchase Program" in 1987, but Apple IIs were already the most popular with K-8 in 1986. Why? macmothership.com/timeline.html#…
Several people have written about how Apple got started with schools (the linked article is particularly good), but they always stop after explaining Apple II dominance in MN and CA by 1983. What about the other 48 states? hackeducation.com/2015/02/25/kid…