Just to be clear, Nintendo's Zelda wasn't blonde until a few games into the series. And Miyamoto says her name was proposed by some PR person who was thinking of F. Scott Fitzgerald's wife Zelda.
Still, it makes you wonder about her later looks.
Galactic Patrol was a spin-off from the movie that used the same character designs but didn't take place in the same continuity. It was slightly more in-line with the books (the Green Lantern origin is gone), but also adds a little Star Trek (like a bridge w/ a Captain's chair).
The show was big about selling toys, so hey, why not throw a power loader into an episode (and in the intro, for good measure), and sell a toy?
This was several years before Aliens, tho. Given James Cameron's known love of anime, did he...?
Anyways, only the first four episodes of the show were ever officially translated into English, edited into a TV movie by Harmony Gold alongside their dub of the theatrical film. The comic by Malibu/Eternity was based on these two dubs, while taking a few liberties of their own.
The idea that the book rights to the movie mean you can only adapt the movie and not the original books is interesting, and shades of Wizard Of Oz. Did you know that, despite Oz being public domain, the ruby red slippers and green Wicked Witch are still under copyright?
The slippers were silver in the original, and the Wicked Witch was never described as green. Those elements first appeared in the MGM movie, which is covered under the expanded copyright law. So everything about that books is public domain except those specific things.
In 1993, Sean Barrett of Steve Jackson Games wanted to do a game book based on the Lensman novels. E.E. Smith's daughter Verna Smith Trestail was reportedly reluctant (though I've only seen second-hand accounts of this), but she eventually approved, and they included this line:
In an article in Pyramid #5 from 1994, Barrett went into a little more detail, which is where people learned that the books rights had been "revoked."
But if Verna saw the film in 1984, why was Berkley still publishing the books as late as 1987?
1987 was also the year Harmony Gold did their dubs of the movie and first episodes of the show. Maybe the Worldcon showing was actually in 1987, and this Usenet poster misremembered?
But Verna had a secret. The comics and game book didn't really need her permission at all.
U.S. copyright is weird. If your book was published before 1964, it was intially protected for 28 years after registration, and then you could file a renewal for 28 more years. If you didn't renew, it became public domain.
According to Stanford's searchable database, it looks like Verna only renewed two of the six books. Which means the initial volumes have all been public domain since the '70s!
Anyone wanting to publish all six books would still need permission from the Estate, but if you were only adapting the first three into a movie or show? Even the Lensman movie technically never needed to purchase the movie rights. But no one seemed to know that at the time.
So if someone wanted to rerelease the Lensman anime in HD, the Estate wouldn't be a problem, if it ever was. When Verna passed away in 1994, the Streamline dub was still available on VHS and LD, and apparently continued to be until the company folded around 2000.
The real mystery is what happened to the Japanese film rights? Did MK Company's deal with Berkley expire, and they thought they had to go through the Estate now?
Whoever owns MK Company's rights to the film and show could bring it back no problem, but who owns those rights?
Until then, the movie exists online in Laserdisc quality, and the 25-episode TV series is considered lost meda.
Streamline Pictures was founded by two animation-fans-turned-pros who wanted anime to be mainstream in America. Their first U.S. theatrical release was Castle In The Sky.
In 1989, they distributed Akira and Lensman. One is considered a classic, the other mostly forgotten.
In Japan, Lensman was extremely influential. A quick search of shmuplations.com reveals that Gradius' aesthetic was heavily inspired by Lensman, and Capcom's Akiman was "obsessed."
But in America, people who saw Lensman right after seeing Akira were not as impressed.
There are many possible reasons why Lensman has been forgotten, but the biggest factor is that it hasn't been available since Laserdisc.
The reasons why it's unavailable is surrounded in rumor and myth, and taking up way too much space in my head. So here's a braindump thread.
The only thing I don't like about the word "Metroidvania" is that it falsely gives appearance that Castlevania contributed as much to the genre as Metroid, if only "Metroidvania" didn't sound so much cooler than "Metroid-like."
But I think I've figured out a solution...
What if we just called everything a "-vania"? Okay, maybe not literally everything, but if we could popularize just two other "-vania" genres, the suffix "-vania" would essentially shift to just mean "-like"!
Would you rather play a Roguelike, or a Roguevania?
Pac-Mania? Maybe the maze-chase genre should be called Pac-Vanias!
Kart racers? More like...Kartvanias!
All '90s shooters formerly called Doom-clones are now Doomvanias!
So I guess Shang-Chi is going to be the movie that breaks my 10-year stretch of seeing every MCU movie in the theater. FOMO isn't enough to outweigh the possibility of a breakthrough infection.
I don't even like theaters, I only go to the theater to see these out of FOMO.
When I went to see Black Widow, Cinemark had multiple "trailers" that were like "aren't you glad the movie theater experience back??" and I was like "NOPE! (But this was cheaper than digital!)"
I'd consider $20, but $30 is too much for me to watch solo. (They're probably imagining a group pooling money to watch.)
Originally my Easter Eggs video was going to be twice as long, and include mention of "Make Love Not War" as well as how the term "Easter Egg" invaded non-computer media, but the lack of info about "Make Love Not War" felt anti-climatic. acriticalhit.com/ready-player-o…
If you grew up in the late '80s or early '90s, you probably remember playing The Oregon Trail on an Apple II. But why were Apple IIs so popular with schools? I've seen a lot of explanations, but they always seem like they're missing...something?
I set out in search of sources that confirmed Apple IIs were the most frequently bought, hoping they'd tell me why. Apple set up a permenent "Education Purchase Program" in 1987, but Apple IIs were already the most popular with K-8 in 1986. Why? macmothership.com/timeline.html#…
Several people have written about how Apple got started with schools (the linked article is particularly good), but they always stop after explaining Apple II dominance in MN and CA by 1983. What about the other 48 states? hackeducation.com/2015/02/25/kid…