When we have an opinion, we tend to attach more weight to data points that support the opinion than to data points that oppose it.
For example, after we buy a stock, we tend to interpret any new information we get as "good for the stock".
17/
For instance, suppose the company *raises* the price of its product. Oh, then margins will improve. Profits will improve. It's good for the stock.
But suppose the company *lowers* prices. Oh, then it will take market share from competitors. And that's good for the stock.
18/
Confirmation Bias was evident in my tryst with the claw machine.
I had only 1 data point (winning the watch) to support my opinion that I was skilled.
It took ~30 data points in the other direction to convince me I was wrong. Because I gave these data points less weight.
19/
In the same way, we all like to believe that we are skilled investors.
So, we tend to remember our winning trades and forget about our losing trades.
In my experience, a lot more people *believe* they've beaten the market than have actually beaten the market.
20/
In 2015, Vox (@voxdotcom) put out a video arguing that modern claw machines are "rigged".
YouTube link (~4 minute video):
21/
It's very interesting.
The "claw strength" of these machines is a tunable parameter.
If it's set high, the claw grips things tightly. So, the player is very likely to win.
But if it's set low, the claw only grips things loosely. So, the player is very likely to lose.
22/
And the machine can also adjust its claw strength from turn to turn -- to achieve any "profit margin" the machine's owner wants.
It's a simple expected value calculation.
Like so:
23/
I don't know if the claw machines I played that summer were "rigged" in this sense.
But I think it's safe to say that I had no appreciable claw guiding skill whatsoever. My "success" was pretty much entirely due to luck.
24/
The last lesson I want to highlight has to do with another sneaky trick that modern claw machines (allegedly) use.
They intentionally *drop* objects in their grip -- to give players the feeling that they *almost* won. This encourages players to throw good money after bad.
25/
This exploits a well-known psychological weakness we have.
Lesson 3, Deprival Super-Reaction Tendency.
If something we possess (or think we possess) is taken away from us, we tend to react much more negatively than if the thing were never given to us in the first place.
26/
For example, come Tax Day, we feel bad if we have to write a $10K check to the government.
Why? Because this is $10K of money that we perceive to be ours, that's sitting in our bank account, that's being snatched away from us.
27/
By contrast, if $20K had been automatically withheld from our income to pay taxes, that doesn't hit us so hard.
Why? Because we never considered that $20K to be ours in the first place. It was never in our bank account.
28/
Similarly, if we buy a stock for $50 and it goes to $80, we feel great.
Unless it went from $50 to $100 first and then came back down to $80. Then we're miserable.
That's Deprival Super-Reaction Tendency.
29/
The manufacturers of slot machines and claw machines are well aware of this tendency.
So, they exploit it to make the game more addictive, making us play more and tilting the odds more against us.
From Charlie Munger's masterful speech, The Psychology of Human Misjudgment:
30/
To summarize:
As humans, we suffer from all kinds of psychological biases.
This can make us behave irrationally, which can hurt our investment returns.
To overcome these biases, we should first be aware of them.
I hope this thread helped with that.
31/
Thanks for reading.
Have a great Labor Day weekend!
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of Capital Allocation.
The better we understand how capital moves in and out of a business, the better we can predict the business's future cash flows and its stock's long-term performance.
2/
Businesses generate *cash* through their operations.
For example, Apple generates cash by selling iPhones.
Starbucks generates cash by selling coffee.
Google generates cash by selling ads.
IBM generates cash by doing things I don't understand.
Etc.
3/
Capital Allocation is the step that comes *after* generating all this cash.
That is, once the cash is available, what does the CEO *do* with it?
What projects does he invest in? What acquisitions does he make? Does he return any cash back to shareholders? Etc.