1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll share with you some lessons I learned from playing the claw machine.

Claw machines tend to bring out many of our psychological biases and irrational tendencies.

As investors, we should put in conscious effort to overcome these.
2/

I grew up in India.

We were a family of 4 -- my parents, my sister, and I.

When I was a kid, the 4 of us got to spend a summer in the US -- visiting my aunt and uncle.

This was a lovely vacation! We toured the Grand Canyon, New York City, Las Vegas, and so on.
3/

That's when I first encountered a "claw machine".

We had gone to a mall. And there it was, next to the food court.

You dropped a quarter into it. And that gave you a chance to guide the "claw" -- to grab one of the enticing toys inside.

It seemed like a game of skill.
4/

More than that, it seemed like a pretty *easy* game. All it needed was a bit of concentration and some decent hand-to-eye coordination.

I had that!

So, my aunt gave me a quarter.

I put the quarter in. I guided the claw.
5/

And ... I won!

The very first time I played. Just as I thought I would.

My prize was a fancy watch with a color changing band.
6/

I was ecstatic.

Not just because of the watch.

But because this was just the beginning.

I could already picture in my mind the massive toy collection I was going to build -- thanks to my claw guiding skill.

All for the price of a few quarters.
7/

From then on, every time we went to a place that had a claw machine, I'd pester my folks for quarters -- to play the machine.

And they'd (mostly) oblige, often with an amused look.

I could tell by these looks that they didn't really expect me to continue winning.
8/

But what did they know, right?

Wasn't it plain as day that I had superb claw guiding skill?

Didn't the watch on my hand prove this beyond doubt?

Of course I was right and they were wrong. And they'd realize their mistake soon enough, when my toy collection reached scale.
9/

But then a strange thing happened.

That whole summer, I didn't win anything else at a claw machine.

Eventually, the realization dawned on me that the watch may have been just a lucky fluke.

But by then, I'd thrown away maybe ~30 quarters.
10/

Today, I look upon those ~30 quarters as a kind of tuition.

I (or rather, my folks) had to pay this tuition so I could learn some valuable lessons.

Lessons that are remarkably relevant to investing.

👇👇👇
11/

Lesson 1, "Luck vs Skill" Bias.

Both *luck* and *skill* play a big role in deciding investment outcomes.

But we have a psychological bias.

When we get a successful outcome, we like to think it's because of our prodigious skill, not dumb luck.
12/

Whereas when we get a not-so-favorable outcome, we like to blame it on bad luck, not lack of skill.

Thus, we tend to systematically over-estimate our skill.

And if we make big bets based on such exaggerated self-appraisals, we're likely to land in trouble sooner or later.
13/

Much like how I lost ~30 quarters because of my misplaced conviction in my own claw guiding skill.

As Richard Feynman said:

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself. And you are the easiest person to fool."
14/

The tendency to confuse luck with skill especially afflicts investors during bull markets, like the one we're in.

As Charlie Munger put it:
15/

Buffett has also repeatedly emphasized the importance of distinguishing luck from skill.

For example, from his 1984 article, The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddesville:

(The whole 13-page article is worth a read if you have the time. PDF Link: www8.gsb.columbia.edu/sites/valueinv…)
16/

Lesson 2, Confirmation Bias.

When we have an opinion, we tend to attach more weight to data points that support the opinion than to data points that oppose it.

For example, after we buy a stock, we tend to interpret any new information we get as "good for the stock".
17/

For instance, suppose the company *raises* the price of its product. Oh, then margins will improve. Profits will improve. It's good for the stock.

But suppose the company *lowers* prices. Oh, then it will take market share from competitors. And that's good for the stock.
18/

Confirmation Bias was evident in my tryst with the claw machine.

I had only 1 data point (winning the watch) to support my opinion that I was skilled.

It took ~30 data points in the other direction to convince me I was wrong. Because I gave these data points less weight.
19/

In the same way, we all like to believe that we are skilled investors.

So, we tend to remember our winning trades and forget about our losing trades.

In my experience, a lot more people *believe* they've beaten the market than have actually beaten the market.
20/

In 2015, Vox (@voxdotcom) put out a video arguing that modern claw machines are "rigged".

YouTube link (~4 minute video):
21/

It's very interesting.

The "claw strength" of these machines is a tunable parameter.

If it's set high, the claw grips things tightly. So, the player is very likely to win.

But if it's set low, the claw only grips things loosely. So, the player is very likely to lose.
22/

And the machine can also adjust its claw strength from turn to turn -- to achieve any "profit margin" the machine's owner wants.

It's a simple expected value calculation.

Like so:
23/

I don't know if the claw machines I played that summer were "rigged" in this sense.

But I think it's safe to say that I had no appreciable claw guiding skill whatsoever. My "success" was pretty much entirely due to luck.
24/

The last lesson I want to highlight has to do with another sneaky trick that modern claw machines (allegedly) use.

They intentionally *drop* objects in their grip -- to give players the feeling that they *almost* won. This encourages players to throw good money after bad.
25/

This exploits a well-known psychological weakness we have.

Lesson 3, Deprival Super-Reaction Tendency.

If something we possess (or think we possess) is taken away from us, we tend to react much more negatively than if the thing were never given to us in the first place.
26/

For example, come Tax Day, we feel bad if we have to write a $10K check to the government.

Why? Because this is $10K of money that we perceive to be ours, that's sitting in our bank account, that's being snatched away from us.
27/

By contrast, if $20K had been automatically withheld from our income to pay taxes, that doesn't hit us so hard.

Why? Because we never considered that $20K to be ours in the first place. It was never in our bank account.
28/

Similarly, if we buy a stock for $50 and it goes to $80, we feel great.

Unless it went from $50 to $100 first and then came back down to $80. Then we're miserable.

That's Deprival Super-Reaction Tendency.
29/

The manufacturers of slot machines and claw machines are well aware of this tendency.

So, they exploit it to make the game more addictive, making us play more and tilting the odds more against us.

From Charlie Munger's masterful speech, The Psychology of Human Misjudgment:
30/

To summarize:

As humans, we suffer from all kinds of psychological biases.

This can make us behave irrationally, which can hurt our investment returns.

To overcome these biases, we should first be aware of them.

I hope this thread helped with that.
31/

Thanks for reading.

Have a great Labor Day weekend!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

11 Sep
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of Capital Allocation.

The better we understand how capital moves in and out of a business, the better we can predict the business's future cash flows and its stock's long-term performance.
2/

Businesses generate *cash* through their operations.

For example, Apple generates cash by selling iPhones.

Starbucks generates cash by selling coffee.

Google generates cash by selling ads.

IBM generates cash by doing things I don't understand.

Etc.
3/

Capital Allocation is the step that comes *after* generating all this cash.

That is, once the cash is available, what does the CEO *do* with it?

What projects does he invest in? What acquisitions does he make? Does he return any cash back to shareholders? Etc.
Read 36 tweets
28 Aug
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the various connections between asset prices, interest rates, and inflation.

As an investor, it's useful to have a mental picture of how these pieces affect -- and are affected by -- one another.
2/

Suppose we have an investment opportunity.

This could be buying a stock, a bond, a private business, etc.

Let's say this opportunity will return $1M in cash to us after 1 year.

And not just that. This $1M will grow at 10% per year for the next 9 years, and 3% thereafter.
3/

This is a classic "cash flow model" that finance-y folk use all the time.

We have a business that promises to grow quickly for a while (in this case, at 10% per year for the next 10 years or so).

But after that, growth slows to a "terminal" crawl (3% per year).
Read 33 tweets
14 Aug
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll help you understand Generating Functions.

They're a super cool math technique you can use to predict the behavior of various financial models. Using just pencil and paper. No Excel!
2/

Imagine we have a portfolio that returns 10% per year.

And we save $50K per year -- which we add to this portfolio.

So, each year, the portfolio grows 10% via compounding, plus $50K of new money pours in.

Starting at $0, what will our portfolio be worth after 30 years?
3/

Many models in finance and investing follow a pattern like this.

They connect the previous year to the next year using a simple formula.

For our example, the formula is: compound the previous year's portfolio by 10% and add $50K => that gives us the next year's portfolio.
Read 25 tweets
7 Aug
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll show you how the P/E ratio of a portfolio is related to the P/E ratios of its individual stocks.

The math here is beautiful. It involves harmonic means and a super elegant theorem known as the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality.
2/

Earlier this week, I conducted a poll where I asked this question about P/E ratios.

Over 6,000 people responded.

Unfortunately, most of them got the answer wrong.

That's why I'm writing this thread. To (hopefully) correct some of the misconceptions that led people astray.
3/

To answer questions like this, it's always a good idea to go back to first principles.

In this case, we should ask ourselves: what exactly does a P/E ratio capture?
Read 28 tweets
1 Aug
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the importance of thinking multi-dimensionally.

This is an essential skill for investors. It helps us make better decisions in situations that involve non-linear combinations of several key factors.
2/

Recently, I conducted a poll on Twitter.

In the poll, I posed the following question about "chains of kindness" at Starbucks.

(Please read the question, as you'll need it to get through the rest of the thread.)
3/

Answering this question correctly requires non-linear multi-dimensional thinking.

The responses that the poll received suggested that people were having difficulty with this.

That's why I'm writing this thread.
Read 28 tweets
11 Jul
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll show you how to count the number of oranges in a pile.

Believe it or not, this exercise can teach us a few lessons about investing.
2/

Earlier this week, I conducted a poll, where I asked the following question:

Here's a pile of oranges, of height 4. The pile contains 20 oranges.

Along the same lines, suppose we build a bigger pile -- of height 100. How many oranges will this bigger pile contain?
3/

The right answer is 171,700. That's how many oranges there'll be in a (similarly constructed) pile of height 100.

The right answer did receive the most votes. Yay!

But a *majority* of respondents (~66.3%) got the answer wrong.

Note: *Plurality* does not mean *majority*!
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(