Seven years ago NATO leaders agreed that a cyber-attack on one member nation can be treated as a cyber-attack on all members. Russia has since committed many devastating acts of war in this manner. NATO should respond by launching military or cyber-attacks against the aggressor.
https://twitter.com/mhmck/status/508030007042535425
Most NATO member countries except a few in Eastern Europe are in the grip of extremist Russia-appeasement factions. Some of these elites are corrupted or compromised by the Putin-Kremlin crime syndicate. All of them are so risk-averse they are paralyzed to total inaction.
https://twitter.com/chopinsheart/status/1434600263453528065
The most risk-averse of Russia-appeasing NATO countries is Canada. Canada won’t expand Russia sanctions to Putin and his inner circle; won’t back a MAP for Ukraine in NATO; won’t arm Ukraine; won’t oppose Russia’s Nord Stream 2 war project.
Canada’s inaction helps #PutinAtWar
Canada’s inaction helps #PutinAtWar
Article 5 should be invoked over Russia’s cyber-attacks. But it is not. What good is NATO?
Non-NATO Ukraine is the only fighting defender of Europe against Russia’s invasion. No NATO member recognizes that Putin’s War is real. What good is NATO?
Non-NATO Ukraine is the only fighting defender of Europe against Russia’s invasion. No NATO member recognizes that Putin’s War is real. What good is NATO?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
