#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by a lawyers' body challenging the decision of the Uttarakhand High Court to revert to full physical functioning from August 24 to the exclusion of virtual mode of hearing cases #vitualhearing
The plea in #SupremeCourt seeks that virtual hearing be declared as a Fundamental right to ease access to justice #virtualhearing
Supreme Court: young lawyers whom you mention want physical hearing
Justice BR Gavai: Bar Council of India chairman made a statement that lawyers are suffering due to virtual courts
Luthra: it can be due to cases not being taken up
Justice Gavai: no no someone can appear for Mercedes, someone can appear from nainital or Mussoorie.. (in lighter vein)
Luthra refers to the parliamentary standing committee report.
Justice Rao: its not the intention of the committee to not to come to court. we miss you seeing in court. we are missing eye to eye contact and argument in full flow in court is missing ! how will young lawyers learn
Justice Rao: the parliamentary committee report is on the backdrop of COVID19.
Justice Rao: virtual courts ICT should be limited but hybrid cannot function forever and physical courts cannot be just done away with. Wha is the fundamental right being violated here? 19 (1)(g)?
Let us hear the Bar Council next time
Justice Rao: we have issued notice to BCI and impleaded BCI and SCBA
Adv Pradeep Yadav: I am opposing this petition. I also have a fundamental right
SC: okay so this is your fundamental right?
Yadav: hybrid is for crucial time. now everything is normal. 5000 lawyers have filed this plea but 5 lakh lawyers are affected
Justice Rao: let the bar council come and let us hear the regulatory bodies. we are not passing any orders
#SupremeCourt is hearing plea by students who have qualified JEE Mains 2021 in their 3rd attempt seeking accommodation to appear for JEE (Advance) Exam for 2021 #JEEAdvanced
Adv Sumanth for petitioners: The petitioners here are those have qualified JEE Mains & are seeking permission to appear for #JEEAdvanced
#SupremeCourt: did you approach the authorities? Once the decision is taken after deliberation, then how can we allow it again?
SC: How can we relax that condition, it'll be a policy matter.?
Supreme Court bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Tribunal Reforms Act 2021 and the case pertaining to mounting vacancies in various tribunals across India #SupremeCourt#TribunalVacancies#TribunalReformsAct
In an affidavit filed by the Centre on Tuesday, it was submitted that no recommendations made by any of the SCSCs now remain pending with the government.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea seeking rehabilitation for the Jhuggi dwellers who were evicted after forest areas were cleared by the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad at Khori Gaon in Faridabad, Haryana
The Faridabad Municipal Corporation (FMC) has submitted before the Supreme Court a housing policy for rehabilitation of persons affected by the demolition of Khori Gaon jhuggis in Faridabad, Haryana
#BombayHighCourt to decide shortly whether the plea filed by ex-State Home Minister #AnilDeshmukh can be heard by a single judge or by a division bench of the High Court.
SG Tushar Mehta: I need some time to prepare. Please grant me two to three days
Justice MR Shah: Please argue we will continue
Sr Adv Arvind Datar: there is a letter for adjournment
Justice Shah: we are not adjourning. Mr. Mehta this is an important issue and it has to be decided. Everyday speculation in newspapers. everything will end with the case
Justice Shah: Do you want to file a rejoinder Mr Mehta?
SG: Yes, my Lord
Justice Shah: we cannot compel you to file a counter. its a policy decision.