Here’s an article full of juice transphobic quotes from @maximebernier, which I will now break down in a 🧵, for anyone who believes they might have merit:
He starts out strong by saying “the @peoplespca believes that adults can identify with the gender they want and undergo whatever medical procedure they want in order to change sex. They must be respected and enjoy the same rights as every Canadian”
But then he says…
“with the active support of the woke far left and Trudeau’s Liberals, a minority of radical trans activists are trying to transform society in a way that curtails everyone’s freedoms.”
When you’re ignorant to your privilege, equal rights feel like oppression.
He goes on to say “this radical agenda is proving particularly harmful to women, children, gays and lesbians.”
Only TERs claim harm to women.
People like Bernier are the ones trying to restrict children’s access to life saving medical care.
Many trans people are gay & lesbian.
He says Bill C-16, “opened the door to compelled speech.”
Did it really? Why doesn’t Bernier raise this issue with regard to any of the other groups who are protected in the exact same way, as part of the Criminal Code and Human Rights Act? Because it’s a non-issue.
“Since then, businesses and government agencies have banned the use of words like ‘women’ and ‘mother’ in favour of ‘menstruating people’ and ‘birthing people,’ which negate the existence of women,”
Please provide one example of an agency banning the word “women” or “mother.” 🙄
Let me just expand on that last tweet, because literally no one I have ever come across, in 8 years of trans advocacy work, has suggested that “women” or “mother” are inappropriate words…unless you’re trying to include people who aren’t women or mothers.
Just to be ultra clear:
A person who menstruates may or may not be a woman, and a woman may or may not menstruate.
A person who gives birth may or may not be a mother, and a mother may or may not have given birth.
“Women are encountering men in changing rooms and bathrooms.”
1) trans women are not men, so if you see a man in the change room or bathroom, that is a completely different issue.
2) We have no bathroom laws in this country, but if we did, this actually would become an issue.
“Violent criminals who are biological men but identify as women are being incarcerated in women’s prisons.”
1) If a person identifies as a woman, they are a women.
2) If anyone poses a danger to other inmates, that’s an issue of prison security, not with trans people.
“Women have to unfairly compete with biological men in sports.”
Again, a trans women is not a biological man. If we’re talking recreation sport, it’s jus do fun and a non-issue. If we’re talking professional sport, restrictions are in place to keep competitions fair.
I’ve actually broached the subject of trans people in sports quite a few times, because I’m a trans woman who plays women’s soccer. Here’s a blog post that also includes two YouTube videos I filmed on the subject.
@maximebernier said boys & girls “suffering from gender dysphoria” are being encouraged to start transitioning “when most of them would grow up to become healthy gays and lesbians.”
Many of them do grow up to be gays and lesbians…in addition to being trans.
How can Bernier criticize C6 (he calls #ConversionTherapy “therapeutic counselling to help them accept who they are instead of destroying their bodies”) when he doesn’t even understand the difference between sexual orientation and gender identity? 🤦🏼♀️
@maximebernier says the @peoplespca would repeal C-16 and C-6 “to protect children from [] doctors and activists,” “protect women and men from intrusions by members of the [same gender]” and “maintain spots for [some] women in which [other women] cannot participate.”
In conclusion, @maximebernier thinks trans women are cis men, and he thinks people transition to avoid being gay. He hasn’t done even the most minute amount of research on this subject, and it shows. He’s parroting transphobic talking points to try to win the transphobe vote.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Does it make financial sense for most commuters to get an EV yet? Let’s use the Nissan Leaf and Versa as examples.
EV batteries have about a 15yr lifespan and cost about $5500 to replace, and commuters average about 20,000km/yr. 🧵
Cost of a Nissan Leaf = $45k
Cost of a Nissan Versa = $20k
Point at which an EV breaks even (assuming 20,000km/yr) = 8yrs
EV’s require less maintenance, so, if you’re buying new either way, and you drive more than 13,000km/year, you would save more money, in the long-term, getting a Leaf than getting a Versa and, with financing, you probably wouldn’t spend much more monthly in the short term either.
I’ve told @NDP candidates that I will shout my support for them from rooftops if they’re just able to tell me that they won’t let the party whip bully them into pushing forward legislation that furthers environmental damage, and still they stay silent.
Does this surprise me? No.
This isn’t a theoretical, this is what happens here in BC. We have a @bcndp government who ran a campaign where they convinced voters they were the party to vote for if you want climate action. They’re now destroying our environment.
Every single @bcndp MLA is complicit in raiding Indigenous lands, logging old growth forests, expanding LNG & fracking, flooding farm land, and the refusal to ban conversion therapy, because they stayed silent and allowed themselves to be whipped. #bcpoli
A big shout out to two local politicians who I know care deeply about our environment- @BonitaZarrillo & @LDupont4Poco! My only hesitation in supporting these two amazing people is the party they’re running for, because every party, except @CanadianGreens, whip their votes.
While the @NDP are my first choice for a whipped party and I struggle to support @CanadianGreens because of their leader and internal politics, I’m inclined to always look for candidates who are not whipped, and therefore won’t be pressured to abandon their principles.
The @NDP link themselves to the @bcndp and, as we’ve seen in BC, the NDP whip their candidates to avoid taking climate action and, in fact, push forward projects that further destroy our planet. They trample on Indigenous rights, and they refuse to ban conversion therapy.
This is a genderqueer flag, designed by by Marilyn Roxie in 2011. Lavender represents androgyny or queerness, white represents agender identity, and green represents those whose identities which are defined outside the binary.
This is the suffragette flag, which was created to represent the Women's Social and Political Union, founded in Britain in 1903. It has now been adopted by Trans Exclusionary Radicals (TERs) to make their presence known.
They’re turning a suffragette symbol into a hate symbol.
Do not confuse the genderqueer & suffragette flags. People who are currently using the suffragette flag to represent themselves are transphobes. The ones represented by the genderqueer flag fall under the trans umbrella. The two flags look similar, but represent opposing sides.
1/ The @bcndp talk a big game about protecting the environment, but actions speak louder than words, so let's take a look at their actions over the past 3.5 years. #bcpoli
2/ Trans Mountain Pipeline:
The @bcndp vowed to fight the pipeline in the courts through all available means. They tried to regulate it; for example, by requiring a permit for heavy oil flowing through the pipeline.
3/ The @bcndp fought for that in court. That court case was ultimately dismissed by both the BC. Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Canada. They could have ordered a “Made in B.C.” environmental assessment of the project, but they didn’t.
We need better healthcare coverage in BC! I’m barely working right now and I just had to spend $185 for 3 months of medication that I need to survive and that’s not the only medication I take. That’s minimal compared to what some people pay and yet it’s still a huge burden.
To put that into perspective. I just spent more than what I’ll make this week on what amounts to about 1 month of my total medication costs.
Coverage for medication isn’t a handout, it’s good economics. Preventative actions are almost always less expensive and better for people than waiting for a disaster to occur before treating the issue.