This morning, I examine at the widening gap between Māori vaccination rates and those of the general population, why the Government's excuse for this gap doesn't hold up and how the situation might even be worse than it appears: newsroom.co.nz/the-stark-ineq…#nzpol#Covid19#Covid19nz
Just 19 percent of eligible Māori have been fully vaccinated, compared to over 30 percent of those in the "European or other" category. About 25 percent of Pasifika are fully vaccinated.
When asked about this disparity, the Govt has long pointed to different age structures in the population, saying that because younger people haven't had a chance to be vaccinated, the % of unvaxxed Māori will be higher. 60+ Māori and Pasifika were more vaccinated than others.
But there are two reasons the Government's argument doesn't hold up. First, we've reached the point where younger age groups are eligible and Māori and Pasifika are under-represented in vaccinations in this groups. In other words, the gap is *widening*.
Second, the age-based rollout assumes there's a level playing field. But there isn't. Recent research by @PunahaMatatini shows a Māori person has the same hospitalisation risk from Covid-19 as a white person 20 years their senior. For Pasifika, the gap is 25 years.
And that comes *after* you account for the higher prevalence of comorbidities in the Māori and Pasifika communities. So while Māori and Pasifika might be ahead of the rest of the population in vaccinating those aged 60-64, for example, they're lagging on a risk-based view:
If you apply the same risk lens to the entire rollout, the stark inequity of the programme comes into view. As @rg_jones told me: "The decision of the Government not to prioritise by ethnicity has led to inequity basically being designed into the vaccine rollout."
I go through all this and more in the article itself, which I encourage you to take a closer look at for the rest of the detail and for a more complete version of my discussion with Rhys Jones: newsroom.co.nz/the-stark-ineq…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a gap between current policies and government pledges - what the IPCC calls the "implementation gap". But even those pledges are a long way away from consistency with 2 degrees of warming, let alone 1.5. That's our "emissions gap".
The IPCC report is kinda radical, as @amywestervelt put it. It explicitly calls out fossil fuel lobbyists as a barrier to mitigation. It says polluters are trying to "deflect corporate responsibility to individuals" - more on that later.
The world can still limit global warming to 1.5°C, but it will require immediate action to slash fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions. My overview of the latest #IPCC report: newsroom.co.nz/we-are-pretty-…
There's a lot in the report! But two charts stood out to me to start with:
1. A few hundred million wealthy people emit far more than billions of poor people
2. Many forms of clean energy are now *cheaper* than fossil fuels - the financial barriers to transition are falling
And a stark line from the SPM: "Human-induced climate change is a consequence of more than a century of net GHG emissions from unsustainable energy use, land use and land use change, lifestyle and patterns of consumption and production." (1/2)
Overseas, Omicron has upended conventional wisdom about how to respond to the pandemic. It will do the same when it arrives in New Zealand. We must have a new playbook ready before it takes off - and we're running out of time. newsroom.co.nz/long-read-how-…#nzpol#Covid19#Covid19nz
Three key things when Omicron gets here: 1. We won't be able to control it like previous variants, only slow it.
2. Even if we slow it down, far more people will be infected than in any previous phase of the pandemic, leading to labour shortages.
3. The health system will still be threatened. Even though Omicron has a lower hospitalisation rate, it will likely infect enough people to send more patients to hospital than in previous outbreaks. Plus, shortages of health workers will reduce capacity.
We are now suppressing the virus, which means a goal of keeping hospitals from being overwhelmed by #Covid19 patients rather than reaching zero cases. But there are three major threats to the success of our new approach: newsroom.co.nz/prepare-for-th…#nzpol#Covid19nz
The first is outbreaks in unvaccinated or under-vaccinated populations, like children (not yet eligible) or Māori and Pasifika. It's no coincidence that the 11 district and city council areas with the greatest proportion of Māori residents are also among the 15 least vaccinated.
The second risk is that our hardworking public health teams may not be able to keep up with widespread community transmission. Public health officials will be the backbone of our suppression strategy, but they have not been resourced sufficiently throughout the pandemic.
Since the start of the pandemic, the police have pointedly not cracked down on anti-lockdown protests even when they violated the rules. The arrests of a handful of extremists in August were a departure from this, as I wrote at the time. 1/4 newsroom.co.nz/police-face-ca…
The police justification for this departure at the time was that the extent of the outbreak was unknown so gatherings represented a legitimate public health risk. There are questions to be asked about why today's larger event didn't pose that risk, in police's view. 2/4
But the notion that police should always crack down on rulebreakers in this way is misguided. What these extremists want is to generate propaganda material and spark violence. Mass arrests or even targeted arrests of organisers risks doing exactly that. 3/4
Friendly reminder that if we had listened to Damien Grant and opened up last August, thousands of people would have died from a virus for which we developed an effective vaccine just months later.
Other requirements/consequences of a Sweden-style strategy:
-Closing secondary schools for months
-A six month (!) ban on visits to nursing and aged care homes
-As many as 30% of cases experiencing long-term, possibly debilitating, symptoms
-Again, thousands of avoidable deaths
Now he's pushing opening up now when:
a. Lockdown is working (which he bizarrely claims isn't the case)
b. Seven in 10 eligible New Zealanders aren't fully protected, but could be in mere months