Why worry about infotainment systems? They’re harmless and fun, right?
Well, not necessarily. A study by the AAA Foundation found that rerouting a destination can distract a driver for up to 40 seconds—enough time to cover half a mile at 50 mph. newsroom.aaa.com/2017/10/new-ve…
Even if a driver uses voice commands, systems often require looking at a car's touchscreen (and not the road) to verify accuracy. That’s inherently risky.
Worse, carmakers eager to differentiate their “driving experience” are adding all kinds of bells and whistles.
Example: BMW claims its infotainment system can read hand gestures (multiple vehicle owners told me this system makes frequent errors).
Or look at the Tesla touchscreen (itself a step backward for safety, compared with haptic feedback of knobs and dials).
Videos online show people surfing the web while driving.
How many of the USA’s 38k+ annual traffic deaths are due to infotainment?
There’s no way to know, bc we lack reliable data. @NHTSAgov blames distraction (including cellphones) for ~10% of fatalities. But that's likely low (post-crash, many drivers won't admit to distraction).
What we *do* know is that infotainment is basically unregulated in the USA.
In 2013 @NHTSAgov issued guidance about maximum levels of distraction created by a vehicle’s system, but automakers often exceed those (voluntary) standards.
New NTSB chair @JenniferHomendy told me that today's infotainment designs vary so widely that drivers get confused: “They’re all so different. There has to be standardization.”
She also suggests that NHTSA add infotainment distraction to its outdated NCAP crash test ratings.
Worryingly, infotainment systems will grow more alluring as ADAS removes traditional driving tasks (like changing lanes).
Drivers are supposed to remain focused on the road, but the temptation to fiddle with infotainment instead will only grow.
Of course, driver distraction from infotainment -- or anything else -- won't be a problem if/when we have fully autonomous vehicles.
A provocative question in this book by @STS_News: Why doesn't the USA regulate car safety like emissions?
"How would automakers transform their products if we mandated that they reduce the number of automotive fatalities in new cars by, say, 40% within 10 years?"
A thread 🧵:
For a century, automobile safety has largely focused on 1) driver education and 2) voluntary agreements by automakers to build safer cars.
Both those approaches are flawed.
Here's future Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan critiquing safety education in 1959:
It "shifts public attention from factors like auto design, which we can reasonably hope to control, to factors such as the temperament and behavior of 80M drivers, who [will ignore] a bunch of slogans."
Just finished @shigashide's book about how to improve bus service—it’s good!
Loads of useful info about operations as well as advocacy. And a surprisingly easy read.
Short 🧵:
2/ Here's an excellent rebuttal to those (like Gov Cuomo) who claim fancy stuff like USB ports and wifi will attract loads of new riders:
3/ @humantransit is a clear influence, so I wasn't surprised to find this stinging critique of microtransit:
“When existing bus routes are unreliable and slow, focusing attention on microtransit is like trying to perfect dessert at a restaurant that routinely burns the entrees.”
Stuck at home, I've read more books in 2020 than I have since college. 20+ have been about cities and mobility.
Because I like making lists, these were my favorites:
[thread]
Order w/o Design is the clearest explanation I’ve seen about how transportation networks shape local economies—and why well-intentioned urban planning schemes often backfire.
Not a light read, but a brilliant one. Previous thread below.
.@SAShistorian's Policing the Open Road came out last year, but it already feels like a classic.
The American legal and criminal systems still haven’t figured out how to fit automobiles into the Fourth Amendment. Minorities and low-income residents pay the price.
Oversized SUVs and trucks are a growing menace to people outside of them-- including pedestrians, cyclists, and occupants of smaller cars.
A Biden admin can begin fixing this (even w/o the Senate).
Here's how. 🧵⤵️
Some context: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) evaluates the design of new autos through its influential New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)-- aka, "the one with the crash test dummies."
Automakers are eager to score valuable ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ NCAP ratings.
2/
NCAP only looks at risk to a vehicle's occupants. Pedestrians, cyclists, and those in other cars don't count.
That gives automakers little incentive to protect vulnerable street users. Instead, they're in an arms race to design the biggest, tallest SUVs and trucks.
Fall seems to be the season for Mobility-as-a-Service panels and debates.
Speaking at several has led me to reflect on my own MaaS journey, summarized in the 🧵 below (w/article links).
TLDR: Despite great promise and hype, very few people use MaaS today. We need new models.
2/ I first learned about MaaS ~5 years ago. It offered a captivating vision: Leverage new technology to knit together trips on transit, bikeshare, carshare, scooters etc to improve cities and reduce private driving.
I was fascinated and wanted to learn more.
3/ 2 years ago I heard a top US transportation guru cite Helsinki as the future of urban mobility “because everyone there uses Whim, a MaaS app, to get around town.”
I then met several Finns who disagreed. That led to this article, my first about MaaS. citylab.com/perspective/20…