Flashy, complicated infotainment systems are creating a growing safety risk. And it's likely to get worse.

A 🧵 about my investigation, in @Slate
slate.com/business/2021/…
Why worry about infotainment systems? They’re harmless and fun, right?

Well, not necessarily. A study by the AAA Foundation found that rerouting a destination can distract a driver for up to 40 seconds—enough time to cover half a mile at 50 mph.
newsroom.aaa.com/2017/10/new-ve…
Even if a driver uses voice commands, systems often require looking at a car's touchscreen (and not the road) to verify accuracy. That’s inherently risky. Image
Worse, carmakers eager to differentiate their “driving experience” are adding all kinds of bells and whistles.

Example: BMW claims its infotainment system can read hand gestures (multiple vehicle owners told me this system makes frequent errors).

Or look at the Tesla touchscreen (itself a step backward for safety, compared with haptic feedback of knobs and dials).

Videos online show people surfing the web while driving.

How many of the USA’s 38k+ annual traffic deaths are due to infotainment?

There’s no way to know, bc we lack reliable data. @NHTSAgov blames distraction (including cellphones) for ~10% of fatalities. But that's likely low (post-crash, many drivers won't admit to distraction). Image
What we *do* know is that infotainment is basically unregulated in the USA.

In 2013 @NHTSAgov issued guidance about maximum levels of distraction created by a vehicle’s system, but automakers often exceed those (voluntary) standards.

nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nt… Image
New NTSB chair @JenniferHomendy told me that today's infotainment designs vary so widely that drivers get confused: “They’re all so different. There has to be standardization.”

She also suggests that NHTSA add infotainment distraction to its outdated NCAP crash test ratings. Image
Worryingly, infotainment systems will grow more alluring as ADAS removes traditional driving tasks (like changing lanes).

Drivers are supposed to remain focused on the road, but the temptation to fiddle with infotainment instead will only grow. Image
Of course, driver distraction from infotainment -- or anything else -- won't be a problem if/when we have fully autonomous vehicles.

But…don’t hold your breath for that.
vox.com/recode/2020/9/…
Notably, everyone I talked to agreed that infotainment can create major risks, but many said “my group is now more focused on autonomous driving.”

If we want to reduce traffic fatalities (now at a 15-yr high) we can’t wait for AVs to be a deus ex machina.
reuters.com/world/us/us-tr…
Thanks to all those who helped me put the pieces together, including those at @IIHS_autosafety, @autosinnovate, @ConsumerReports, @AAAFoundation1, and @NTSB (plus many others, both on and off the record).
A few comments note that infotainment screens have grown much larger.

Counterintuitively, larger screens might actually be safer (easier to find & reach the desired function).

More troubling IMO: Layered menus requiring multiple steps, and removal of buttons/knobs w screens. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Zipper

David Zipper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidZipper

5 Jun
A provocative question in this book by @STS_News: Why doesn't the USA regulate car safety like emissions?

"How would automakers transform their products if we mandated that they reduce the number of automotive fatalities in new cars by, say, 40% within 10 years?"

A thread 🧵:
For a century, automobile safety has largely focused on 1) driver education and 2) voluntary agreements by automakers to build safer cars.

Both those approaches are flawed.
Here's future Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan critiquing safety education in 1959:

It "shifts public attention from factors like auto design, which we can reasonably hope to control, to factors such as the temperament and behavior of 80M drivers, who [will ignore] a bunch of slogans."
Read 8 tweets
10 Apr
Just finished @shigashide's book about how to improve bus service—it’s good!

Loads of useful info about operations as well as advocacy. And a surprisingly easy read.

Short 🧵: Image
2/ Here's an excellent rebuttal to those (like Gov Cuomo) who claim fancy stuff like USB ports and wifi will attract loads of new riders: Image
3/ @humantransit is a clear influence, so I wasn't surprised to find this stinging critique of microtransit:

“When existing bus routes are unreliable and slow, focusing attention on microtransit is like trying to perfect dessert at a restaurant that routinely burns the entrees.”
Read 5 tweets
15 Mar
BREAKING-- Congress just released text of the “EBIKE Act," which would offer a refundable tax credit of up to $1,500 for a new e-bike purchase.

Link: congress.gov/bill/117th-con…

If it passes, the EBIKE Act would be groundbreaking. A 🧵:
2/ Why get excited about e-bikes?

They’re terrific for the environment. Check out this table from @ITF_Forum, comparing greenhouse gas emissions for major passenger transport modes.

Report: itf-oecd.org/good-to-go-env…
3/ E-bikes’ extra pedal power makes them capable of replacing cars on the 50%+ of US trips under 6 miles (esp on hot days, or on routes with hills).

That would give a nice boost to health, the environment, and to street safety.

greencarcongress.com/2018/08/201808…
Read 11 tweets
27 Dec 20
Stuck at home, I've read more books in 2020 than I have since college. 20+ have been about cities and mobility.

Because I like making lists, these were my favorites:

[thread]
Order w/o Design is the clearest explanation I’ve seen about how transportation networks shape local economies—and why well-intentioned urban planning schemes often backfire.

Not a light read, but a brilliant one. Previous thread below.

.@SAShistorian's Policing the Open Road came out last year, but it already feels like a classic.

The American legal and criminal systems still haven’t figured out how to fit automobiles into the Fourth Amendment. Minorities and low-income residents pay the price.
Read 8 tweets
11 Nov 20
Oversized SUVs and trucks are a growing menace to people outside of them-- including pedestrians, cyclists, and occupants of smaller cars.

A Biden admin can begin fixing this (even w/o the Senate).

Here's how. 🧵⤵️
Some context: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) evaluates the design of new autos through its influential New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)-- aka, "the one with the crash test dummies."

Automakers are eager to score valuable ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ NCAP ratings.

2/
NCAP only looks at risk to a vehicle's occupants. Pedestrians, cyclists, and those in other cars don't count.

That gives automakers little incentive to protect vulnerable street users. Instead, they're in an arms race to design the biggest, tallest SUVs and trucks.

3/
Read 9 tweets
24 Oct 20
Fall seems to be the season for Mobility-as-a-Service panels and debates.

Speaking at several has led me to reflect on my own MaaS journey, summarized in the 🧵 below (w/article links).

TLDR: Despite great promise and hype, very few people use MaaS today. We need new models.
2/ I first learned about MaaS ~5 years ago. It offered a captivating vision: Leverage new technology to knit together trips on transit, bikeshare, carshare, scooters etc to improve cities and reduce private driving.

I was fascinated and wanted to learn more.
3/ 2 years ago I heard a top US transportation guru cite Helsinki as the future of urban mobility “because everyone there uses Whim, a MaaS app, to get around town.”

I then met several Finns who disagreed. That led to this article, my first about MaaS.
citylab.com/perspective/20…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(