By this reasoning, everyone supporting seatbelts being mandatory also supports policemen beating who doesn’t wear them?

I don’t like vaxxports either, but the reasoning below is BS. Most people who support mandates also condemn dishumane treatment.

1/3

2/ I want policemen who abuse their powers to be fired, and reasonings such as the above get into the way of that, seeming to imply that laws define humanity – a very dangerous premise.

But humanity isn’t determined by rules; it’s what happens regardless of the rules.
3/ Reasonings such as the above are divisive, focusing on partisanship & putting values eg humanity on the sidelines.

That only brings more dishumane behavior.
4/ Here’s IMHO a more constructive message: “Cops beating people over nonviolent behavior is dishumane and we probably all agree on that regardless of vaxxport stance. How do we get rid of the bad apples and of the conditions that created them?”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Dellanna

Luca Dellanna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DellAnnaLuca

11 Sep
WHY IT'S WRONG TO MAKE ANALOGIES WITH ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RE: COVID, AND WHY VACCINES DON'T CREATE VARIANTS

The principle:
- antibiotics & vaccine select for variants but don't create them; what creates them is transmission

This matters because…

(short thread)
2/ Antibiotics are used after symptoms, where millions of viruses are already in the body, and some can *already have mutated* to escape the antibiotic (and thus get selected), whereas vaccines are already there before the virus that got in can reproduce
3/ Also, drugs are more specific in the enzymes or proteins that they can attack, whereas vaccines lead to many times of antibodies, casting a wider net.
Read 4 tweets
20 Aug
I hate the usual advice of sandwiching feedback (say something good, then something bad, then something good). It created a generation of people who think they are good at giving feedback just because they're sandwiching it – with terrible results

Here is some better advice

1/N
First of all, avoid sandwiching.

If people know about it, the moment they hear you say something good, they'll roll their eyes, think "here comes the bad part", and disconnect.

This is bad:
- it prevents listening
- they don't trust the "good part,” thus not getting motivated
Second advice: BE SPECIFIC.

Generic feedback, such as "your presentation was boring", gets taken personally thus ignored.

Instead, specific feedback, such as "there was too much text in your presentation", has more chances of being listened to.
Read 10 tweets
10 Aug
A good question I received today. Let's assume that "COVID is there to stay" and "the vaccination campaign completed" but "there's still breakthrough cases."

Does it matter whether there's a lot of virus circulating (compared to little)?
In other words, would it still pay to be cautious? (Not talking about lockdowns, of course, but about wearing masks on public transport and similar measures.)
My intuition would be: it matters, because
- fewer cases → fewer hospitalizations (and deaths), even if hospitalization rates are low
- fewer cases → lower risk of variants
- lower viral load → better outcomes after infection

But I'd love to learn more about the topic.
Read 5 tweets
4 Aug
Note that the vaccinated group here is older. Hence, I imagine, the same viral load even though they’re vaccinated.

That said, as @Molson_Hart pointed out, it brings up questions on the effectiveness of “vaccinated-only-entrance” restrictions.
2/ The referenced tweet. (Note that this doesn’t mean vaccines are ineffective. They’re very effective at preventing severe illness. The question is how much they stop transmission when relied too much upon.)

3/ I meant “the effectiveness of vaccine-only-entrance” towards containing transmission (which is important to protect both the unvaccinated & few unlucky vaccinated, and reduce the likelihood of variants)

It’s prob an effective measure re: reducing hospitalizations and deaths
Read 5 tweets
3 Aug
Common fallacies re: breakthrough COVID cases

1/ Using the vaccinated / unvaccinated ratio in hospitalizations, deaths, etc. without controlling for age (and its influence on mortality)
2/ Using the vaccinated / unvaccinated ratio in deaths *within a hospital*

A sample filtered by severity doesn't contain information other than "very sick people are likely to die"

Better: vax/novax deaths ratio in general population, controlled for age

3/ To clarify the previous point: imagine a boat with 50 vaccinated and 500 unvaccinated; 5 of each are in the ICU, and 2 of each die. Does it mean that the vaccine offers no excess protection, because the ratio "vax deaths / vax in ICU" is the same as novax's?

Of course not.
Read 7 tweets
24 Jul
Want to help with the vaccinations?

Make a FAQ on the risks of COVID vaccines that clearly answers:
- risks & unknowns for a teenager
- …for a 30 yo
- …for ladies planning a pregnancy
- how we know that

without:
- politics
- morals
- pushing benefits
- over-technical language
(Is there any? I couldn't find one.)
Things that many people hesitant about the vaccination DON'T care about:
- how mRNA works
- how safe doctors think it is
- if the average person is better off vaccinating

Things they want to know:
- short- and long-term risks
- how probable for people like them
- how do we know
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(