As a layperson, trying to follow #Singapore’s #Covid19 messaging since early 2020 has become incredibly confusing and just so damn exhausting.
This is a Covid fatigue thread/rant.
We’ve been praised for our handling of the pandemic (despite some serious fuck-ups, like with the migrant worker dormitories), but if you’re living in Singapore trying to follow the comms, it’s mind-boggling.
Yes, we have to keep in mind that #Covid19 is new and there's still so much that we don’t know about it. Things change as the science reveals more. That’s understandable. But there’s still a lack of clarity in communication that makes people more anxious and uncertain.
The way the government talks about pandemic measures has changed multiple times. When #Covid19 cases first emerged, they pointed us to the DORSCON measures to give an idea of what #Singapore’s plans will be like depending on the situation.
It felt like a kid counting up to 10 and then suddenly going, "...8, 9... 9 and one-fifths... 9 and two-fifths..." hello why did the counting change
Every time there is something like this, there are new rules. It’s confusing for the average person, but a nightmare for businesses, especially F&B outlets who are constantly playing catch-up trying to adjust their staffing, stock, etc. to deal with whatever new rules are coming.
This is because the number of #Covid19 cases have gone up, and the authorities are concerned about the rate of transmission. This might translate to more people ending up in ICU: channelnewsasia.com/singapore/covi…
However, the government has earlier denied that the number of ICU beds is an obstacle to Singapore opening up. This is a letter written by a doctor in July calling for attention to ICU capacity: straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/…
There’s also been talk from the government about possibly giving booster shots not just to the vulnerable and elderly, but also younger adults. Experts have questioned this, ‘cos the benefit of a booster for young adults isn’t clear at this stage: straitstimes.com/singapore/expe…
Trying to take all this in is exhausting. Over the past few days I've heard from others who are similarly fatigued and frustrated, no longer knowing how much the government's messaging follows what the science actually says, no longer knowing how to parse what we're being told.
I'm not an infectious diseases expert or an epidemiologist. I don't want to pretend that I know better than experts. I want to be a responsible citizen. But I don't know how much of what the govt is saying is based on sound expert advice, either. It's a lot and it's confusing. 😫
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I know that many people have different opinions and criticism of The Online Citizen. I don't want to dissect all the things that have been said about TOC. Instead, I'd like to reflect on the impact it's had not just on Singapore, but on individuals like myself.
I joined TOC as a volunteer in 2010. Believe me when I say I was green—a complete blur-blur rookie. I was only just beginning to show an interest in socio-political issues. There was so much I didn't know, from the ins and outs of Singapore politics to how to write news reports.
Actually, the only thing I had to offer when I first joined TOC was the fact I knew how to operate a camera and use video editing software. They were short of a person who could go out (as part of a small team) to get vox-pops on the mandatory death penalty in Singapore.
1/ At various times over 2020/21, there’s been interest in #Singapore’s response to #Covid19. I think people outside SG see a lot of surface-level stuff and end up projecting their own opinions/desires onto our measures.
A 🧵 to unpack some of Singapore’s Covid response so far.
2/ Recently, there was excitement (outside SG) about how SG said #Covid19 will be endemic, and will move away from quarantines/border closures/focus on daily case counts. This was used to support arguments that Covid is “like the flu” and restrictions elsewhere should be lifted.
This reminds me of the time I was talking to a group of university students about "fake news" and one said that China's Great Firewall might be a good idea because then they keep all the external "fake news" out and only need to worry about dealing with internal "fake news".
Among younger Singaporeans, I wonder how much attention or understanding there is of what's going on in China. There are many SGeans who aren't even aware of human rights issues in our own country, much less China. We're also not used to paying attention to politics+power.
I'm seeing some older friends/acquaintances skew towards China more these days. I'm not sure what the exact reason is, but suspect: they're consuming Chinese media (or people around them are doing so) or there's just a lot of muddle about what's true, suspicion of "the West".
1/ Here's my quick translation of today's @zaobaosg editorial on racism in #Singapore.
tl;dr It attributes racist incidents to #Covid19 frustrations, social media, and Critical Race Theory, described as an imported idea encouraging racist hatred against white people.
I don't read @zaobaosg often, but from what I've seen, this is in character for Singapore's Chinese language daily broadsheet.
3/ According to @zaobaosg logic, racism is the fault of everything but racist systems/structures, and long-held prejudices. While it notes in its opening paragraph that recent incidents were perpetrated by Chinese people, it doesn't bother to examine what that indicates.
1/ This @straits_times headline and graphic is so thoughtless and frames this issue in such a damaging way.
Throughout the article, it's made clear that these transnational families are more financially disadvantaged than families where both parents are citizens, which leads to particular stressors and challenges. This is a class issue, not a nationality issue.
It really isn't about "the mother's origins", but about income levels and marginalisation. The professor makes this point, but it's lower down in the article and, with that headline + graphic, too little too late.
On the individual level, it's "nice" to see people donating to help others in need. The local media loves to highlight this; the angle is usually how Singaporeans are generous and caring and empathetic, really.
What's less examined is *why* we're crowdfunding in the first place.
Donating is a nice thing as an individual, but as a society we should be asking if it's just that a delivery rider doesn't get work injury compensation/accident insurance 'cos we have a gig economy that leaves companies free of responsibilities for the workers who prop them up.
Local media focused on how encouraging it is to see Singaporeans chip in to raise money for Piang Ngaih Don's family after her case came up in the press. That might assuage our conscience, but I'm sure her family would have preferred her to *not* be murdered by her employer.