#SupremeCourt hears application seeking direction to conduct back up examination for the July attempt of the CA 2021 Examination before November 2021
#CAExams2021 @pbhushan1 Image
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench hears the case

Adv Prashant Bhushan: Now they say back up exams can be taken when regular exams are held in November.

Justice Khanwilkar: So this order was passed in July?

@pbhushan1 : what will happen as a result is these people who could not take the exams in July and for whose benefit backup exam order was passed they will have lost one attempt of exam and syllabus will also change
Sr Adv Ramji Srinivasan: Let me assuage the concern there will be no loss of option to the ones who have opted out. We had stated that such candidates will b given back up exam option in November 2021
Justice Khanwilkar: they say option will be lost due to change of syllabus

Srinivasan: they say instead of keeping back up exams in Nov, let the exams be preponed and a separate exam be conducted for the opt out candidates. all facilities for opt out students will be available
Bhushan: But last year you had back up exams
#caexams #supremecourt
SC: If they appear in November the attempt is lost.

@pbhushan1 : There is another aspect

Justice Khanwilkar: just a minute

Srinivasan: He wants a preponement of the exam
SC: This is so that they have one more chance for the old syallbus. Only one more chance thereafter.

Srinivasan: I will go back and take instructions. ICAI has seen there are logistical arrangements thus we will stick to our cycle of May and November cycle.
Srinivasan: there are issue sins schools to vacate, getting examiners etc

SC: That is fine.. let them appear in Nov, but give them another attempt in next cycle as per old syllabus
Srinivasan: We would like to have consistency and regularity for exams and students for the November cycle

SC: What i am saying in the next cycle after November have another exam as per old syllabus. we will not disturb your current cycle
Bhushan: last year they did not have logistical issues. there were no great logistical arrangements

SC: If you are getting one more option it solves your purpose
Bhushan: every person who clears the exam are treated as graduates of a particular year and now they will be treated as pass outs of that year

SC: Please make representation to ICAI and then let us see what they say. Idea of back up last year was wrong they say ...
@pbhushan1 : it is not their on affidavit my lord
SC: You are interested in appearing in exam or finding fault with the institutes?

Bhushan: I am only interested in exams and my seniority
if they had complied with your order we would have passed this year itself. next year exams will be a problem
SC: We dont wish to continue the writ further in view of ICAI stand that all aspects brought before the institute will be taken note of provided its in consonance with the policy. we permit petitioner to make written representation to the Mr Ramji Srinivasan appearing for ICAI
SC: Mr Srinivasan has assured that the decision on suggestion will be taken in two weeks from now.
Srinivasan: I am only reassuring my friend in black and white. It is there in the notification.

Bhushan: that an extra attempt will be given in old syllabus

Srinivasan: Yes

Matter over

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

15 Sep
[Information commissioner vacancies]

#SupremeCourt to hear the plea filed by RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj seeking to fill posts of Information Commissioners at national and state level

@AnjaliB_ Image
Advocate Rahul Gupta: Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan is appearing before Court No.6. I am seeking a Passover.

Justice Nazeer: We have some problem today afternoon. We will fix it some other day. Next week? What date you want?

(No response)

Read 4 tweets
15 Sep
#SupremeCourt is hearing plea by students who have qualified JEE Mains 2021 in their 3rd attempt seeking accommodation to appear for JEE (Advance) Exam for 2021 #JEEAdvanced Image
Adv Sumanth for petitioners: The petitioners here are those have qualified JEE Mains & are seeking permission to appear for #JEEAdvanced

#SupremeCourt: did you approach the authorities? Once the decision is taken after deliberation, then how can we allow it again?
SC: How can we relax that condition, it'll be a policy matter.?
Read 7 tweets
15 Sep
Supreme Court bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Tribunal Reforms Act 2021 and the case pertaining to mounting vacancies in various tribunals across India
#SupremeCourt #TribunalVacancies #TribunalReformsAct
In an affidavit filed by the Centre on Tuesday, it was submitted that no recommendations made by any of the SCSCs now remain pending with the government.

#SupremeCourt #TribunalVacancies

Attorney General for India KK Venugopal to address the bench on behalf of Central government
#supremecourt #tribunalvacancies
Read 39 tweets
14 Sep
Khori Gaon Demolition:

#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea seeking rehabilitation for the Jhuggi dwellers who were evicted after forest areas were cleared by the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad at Khori Gaon in Faridabad, Haryana

The Faridabad Municipal Corporation (FMC) has submitted before the Supreme Court a housing policy for rehabilitation of persons affected by the demolition of Khori Gaon jhuggis in Faridabad, Haryana

Sr Adv Atmaram Nadkarni: We have filed a writ on behalf of anantpur villagers who too face threat of demolition. we seek listing of the case

Justice Khanwilkar: Yes we will see
Read 40 tweets
14 Sep
#BombayHighCourt to decide shortly whether the plea filed by ex-State Home Minister #AnilDeshmukh can be heard by a single judge or by a division bench of the High Court.

Deshmukh moved the High Court seeking quashing of ED summons in money laundering case initiated after CBI FIR.

Justice Sandeep K Shinde had reserved the issue for verdict on Friday.

Read 5 tweets
14 Sep
One Time Spectrum Charge case in #SupremeCourt

SG Tushar Mehta: I need some time to prepare. Please grant me two to three days

Justice MR Shah: Please argue we will continue
Sr Adv Arvind Datar: there is a letter for adjournment

Justice Shah: we are not adjourning. Mr. Mehta this is an important issue and it has to be decided. Everyday speculation in newspapers. everything will end with the case
Justice Shah: Do you want to file a rejoinder Mr Mehta?

SG: Yes, my Lord

Justice Shah: we cannot compel you to file a counter. its a policy decision.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!