I tweeted this donkey story earlier today. I'm going to spin it, a related donkey story, and some thoughts together here. I welcome y'all to come along, but it may be a bumpy ride.
Many of the gate and corner posts on our place are rotting off. Wood does that. Some woods are very resistant, but it doesn't suit our economy to grow them. We need morebiggerbetterfaster. So these were all treated posts or old railroad ties.
They rot off 6" under the ground.
3. Phone poles do too. Climbing telephone people are trained to probe a pole with a long screwdriver, downward at a slant from ground level.
If the screwdriver goes in, don't climb it.
I've climbed it, because I was self employed and needed the work, but that's another story.
4. So, out on one edge of the fenced and gated barn area, which is a core of an old style farm, one rotted off and fell down.
It's been too hot and dry to replace it. I dig holes with a posthole digger that has two handles and round blades. You've probably seen one.
5. The climate change clay on this place is harder than concrete right now. I'd have to start with dynamite.
It'll rain one day, harder than we want for longer than we want. Since we have chosen to live in this climate, I plan around it.
So after that, I'll buy a bunch of wood 🪵
6. But for now, the donkeys and I have agreed that this rope is a gate. This is entirely voluntary. It's only one step from a line painted on the ground. One rope, about mid thigh on me, a not very tall guy.
7. They could step over it. Clara could probably untie it. They honor it because they choose to. I say to them, you may eat the grass over here but do not go over there, please, and they accept that deal.
A Trumper never would honor a deal like that. Donkeys are better people.
9. I've got 8 or 10 rotted off posts that need to be replaced. But I'm 74, and I'm tired. And I can work around them.
This is where a genuine human community living in concert and cooperation with one another and Earth would work vastly better.
And yes it is too possible.
10. I can take you and show you some if you're doubtful.
Every industrial machine ever built was built for the express purpose of making some human being unnecessary. Redundant. In Britain that's the word for Fired, and it's better.
11. Millions of humans all over the world are are useless, bored, angry, with no productive activity available for them to do. Maybe they're not too bright. The bell curve is real. Half of everyone is below average. Maybe they're just unlucky. Maybe "the economy" isn't "growing."
12. Joe Biden wants to increase the US's energy throughput and GHG emissions, bulldoze tens of thousands to millions of acres of biosphere, and cover it with more industrial machinery to make more people redundant, while all the good climate concerned fret about overpopulation.
13. And praise Biden's plan to the high heavens.
14. Besides making people redundant and excess, or actually the objective of making people redundant and excess, industrial machinery, each individual machine from the first one to the next, was built to increase the gap between rich and poor. Make the rich richer, the poor more.
15. Every machine ever built was built with the objective of not paying somebody for what they were doing yesterday.
And it is considered cool to sneer at Luddites. Weavers.
This is why we have to have "growth."
To employ all the people we fired yesterday
Made redundant yesterday
16. People and machines run on the same thing: energy.
Everything runs on energy.
Earth is the source of energy.
I have never, ever, in my life heard someone say, or seen someone tweet, "We can't pave all that Infrastructure Plan, for crying out loud, there's too many people!"
17. If there's too many people, and Earth can't support them, by what possible justification besides cold blooded murder would anyone ever cover a square foot of otherwise arable Earth with concrete? Or solar panels? Or wind turbines? Or airports?
For God's sake, if there's too..
18. Oh, pardon me. You mean there's too many people for you to have the airports and the highways and the solar panels, so, given a choice, the humans have got to go. I understand.
But let's all be clear here.
330 million of those people are extracting and wasting more energy,
19. And more resources, and wasting more arable land, than any other two billion on Earth.
So if there's really too many of us, we'd get the most bang for the buck if we built a big wall around the United States, and flooded it and stocked it with fish.
Cause that's where the
20. Too many people are, for sure.
21. In a healthy human community my wife's farm, where I live and work, could easily support 3 families, with work donkeys, and include an 18 acre commons for grazing, haying, and nut and fruit gathering.
But we'd rather pile all the humans up in stinking teeming cities,
22. and waste untold billions and trillions of BTUs and material handling infrastructure hauling feed in to them and their shit out to sea, which is nearly a crime against humanity.
In return for which we have to kill the oceans with fertilizer.
23. And bitch because there's too many of them.
The girls and I hauled some hay today. Sydney was over, did their feet. We discussed how their hooves are handling the amount of road work they're doing, which is well, and options as it increases.
But that's another thread.
Later.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff McFadden

Jeff McFadden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @homemadeguitars

12 Sep
I'm going to run through screenshots of a conversation I just had with a highly paid climate professional.
He started with the normal climate tweet: "Take action now."
So I asked my usual annoying question. What action?
2. As usual, his response was not what I define as "action", but was, rather, a statement of end point goals.
You can see that he knew I wasn't going to be impressed.
Who on Earth could dispute "phase out GHG emissions?"
I had asked for "how" but he didn't want to discuss that.
3. So. What was my reply?
I still wanted him to name actions. Things people could do, as averse to words to say.
What is an action which furthers this goal? What comes next? Step 1, step 2, first you get the... Nah. We don't do that in the developed world.
Read 13 tweets
11 Sep
I'm sewing on my team lines this morning, adjusting them to more ideally fit the team, to make work more comfortable for all of us.
This provides me a productive task on which to focus, to keep my mind away from the poison of 21st century industrial America.
You can see here that I have made the lines so they split too far back and tend to hang up on the girls and their harness.
Here I have sewn them further up, and they are laying better to the task, but I think there's still room for improvement.
This is what I call "progress." To most of America "progress" is more high energy machines.
I guess it depends on your objective.
Read 4 tweets
10 Sep
My theory:
If there is any possibility of humankind escaping the worst of the doom we have signed up for (not a sure thing) that possibility lies in maximizing the biological carbon cycle.
There is lots of room for growth. We've killed and paved much of it.
2. Reducing our emissions will be an inevitable output of any serious effort to restore / regenerate / reactivate the global ecosystem / biosphere / carbon cycle.
All this high energy high volume giant scale machinery everyone wants to replace fossil fuels with - that's opposite.
3. We already have too much carbon in the atmosphere. I'm not going to defend that point.
If we want to survive, we take action to reduce that carbon directly, not by machinery that we have to emit carbon to build, but by photosynthesis at every level supported by other life.
Read 28 tweets
10 Sep
Observe the orange box, and the stripes into and out of it.
The orange box is electric generation. The stripes in are what powers it, and the stripes out are where the energy from it goes.
The biggest stripe, the light gray one, is the energy wasted ("rejected") by the process.
2. Now observe the largest pink box, the one at the bottom. Transportation. Observe the bands going into it from the left, which consists of, mostly, the dark green band, petroleum. And it's a big sucker.
Observe that the light gray output, wasted energy, is about 4 times as big,
3. As the dark gray band, "energy services," i.e. "What we wanted out of this process."
Now. Every day, often five to ten times per day, I see "electric vehicles" listed as "for the climate" to "reduce emissions."
Read 15 tweets
9 Sep
True donkey story: 🧵
There was a spot on the road near home that Clara was afraid of.
Some scumbag had dumped a big old overstuffed recliner in the ditch there, and the way it had fallen there was a big black hole in the middle. Scared Clara something fierce.
2. I was going to take her on a lead rope, and take a pocket full of goodies, and walk down there and spend some time looking closely at it, let her see that it wasn't a threat, but the county finally came and hauled it away. So I thought it was all done.
3. As it turned out, though, between the fencerow tree line the neighbor's row of big bales in deep shade on the other side, the general darkness of the area, and the memory, she still always shied away from the spot. It's along part of our farm, so it was a recurring problem.
Read 16 tweets
8 Sep
Do y'all remember back in 2046 when Hurricane Ida hid Louisiana then did a twofer on New York and New Jersey?
What? That wasn't 2046? In was 2021?
What the fuck does having half of something in 2050 do for real people in real life?
Nada.
2. I can't understand why the people aren't up in arms.
Actually I can.
They have been hoodwinked with the biggest pack of science fiction feel-good ever written.
3. It's against the rules to discuss this, but that process - 50% of electricity by 2050 - starts with making it.
And making it is an energy intensive process.
And it's the very first process.
During that energy intensive period, we are planning to continue our current economy,
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(