(1) Hydra.
Based on what I understand about Hydra is that low value transactions will be either automatically or with a decision of a user routed through L2 Hydra.
Based on what I understand about Hydra is that low value transactions will be either automatically or with a decision of a user routed through L2 Hydra.
(2)
Now this is all known but think about like this, in E.U. it is necessary to register transactions from 10.000 EUR and banks do this, no major institution cares that you are buying a coffee or a meal for 5 EUR.
Now this is all known but think about like this, in E.U. it is necessary to register transactions from 10.000 EUR and banks do this, no major institution cares that you are buying a coffee or a meal for 5 EUR.
(3)
Those transactions would be routed automatically or manually via Hydra L2.
Stake Pool Operator would still contain log of those transactions and perhaps Hydra will introduce some async syncing process to send this data (replicate) to another SPOs for redundancy reasons.
Those transactions would be routed automatically or manually via Hydra L2.
Stake Pool Operator would still contain log of those transactions and perhaps Hydra will introduce some async syncing process to send this data (replicate) to another SPOs for redundancy reasons.
(4)
They key is that process to send Hydra transactions to another SPO must be an asynchronous process, then you eliminate all mess associated with taking part in consensus.
They key is that process to send Hydra transactions to another SPO must be an asynchronous process, then you eliminate all mess associated with taking part in consensus.
(5) My understanding is also that with Hydra apart from getting isomorphic smart contracts (+), sadly one would not get inclusive accountability (this is for sure a disadvantage), only on L1 you have other people checking your transactions.
(6)
Long story short, this is very interesting approach, in line with overall regulations, and no other blockchain is planning it.
@_KtorZ_ does this somehow make sense? How would Cardano know what is low value transaction what is high value, could user override it (L1 or L2)?
Long story short, this is very interesting approach, in line with overall regulations, and no other blockchain is planning it.
@_KtorZ_ does this somehow make sense? How would Cardano know what is low value transaction what is high value, could user override it (L1 or L2)?
@_KtorZ_ Is it even possible for Cardano to implement Blockchain pipelinening that Algorand have or architecture prevents it? It pushed them from 1.000 TPS to 46.000 TPS. We don't need this yet but question is whether this approach for L1 scaling is even possible on Cardano?
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
