One of the best proposals in the current legislative negotiations was Chris Coons' Industrial Finance Corporation - a $500 billion national development bank that could fund decarbonization and reshoring of supply chains. See @yayitsrob here:
theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
The proposal would have put the US about even with KfW - the German development bank that @Thomas_Marois has written extensively about.
Though it still would have been only a fraction of China's $2.4 trillion development bank.
And it's not just $500 billion in direct lending and investing capacity: the Coons proposal would have crowded in lots of private investment that would otherwise go into socially wasteful activities.
coons.senate.gov/news/press-rel…
That's trillions of bucks that could have helped execute the administration's ambitious supply chain plans...
And gets the topline spending closer to what many climate advocates say is necessary to deliver fuller decarbonization.
Unfortunately, it does not seem like the Industrial Finance Corporation proposal made it into the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill working its way through Congress. (See absence from the House Financial Services Committee draft text.)
docs.house.gov/meetings/BA/BA…
Assuming that omission lasts, other legislative vehicles like the National Defense Authorization Act or the bipartisan US Innovation and Competition Act should be contemplated.
democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press…
Here's the link to Thomas' book, about which more forthcoming.
Another apparent reconciliation casualty: White House asked for $50 billion for supply chain resilience, but House Energy and Commerce only appropriates one fifth that.
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
And instead of a national green bank that could leverage $27.5 billion in appropriations into $275 billion in lending capacity, we're getting a national green grantmaker that will share $27.5 billion with state green banks. So some indirect but no direct leverage, as I read it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Todd N. Tucker

Todd N. Tucker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @toddntucker

8 Sep
Highly recommend @stephenwertheim's newish book, "Tomorrow, the World."

A close look at how FDR outsourced a lot of postwar planning to private business and think tank leaders, who used racist arguments and discourse policing to remake internationalism.
hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?is…
It helps solve the puzzle of how we glided from a hemispheric and solidaristic orientation of the Good Neighbor policy in the early FDR years to eventually 800 bases globally.
nytimes.com/2009/07/14/opi…
Adds to our understanding of the complexity of the Roosevelt administration. The same admin had folks that engaged in extensive economic planning, and folks that sought to make economic planning more difficult after the war.
cambridge.org/core/books/gen…
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
The US Innovation and Competition Act, which passed the Senate on a bipartisan basis earlier this month, included the Build America, Buy America Act, which significantly tightens Buy American rules.
congress.gov/bill/117th-con…
The congressional findings section makes clear the multifaceted reasons why the spending of tax dollars for procurement purposes is unlike spending by private market actors.
The bipartisan agreed definition of "infrastructure" goes beyond the "roads and bridges" definition some in the GOP have insisted on, and included water and broadband.
Read 11 tweets
22 Jun
So... is this the full list of social conditions for semiconductor firms to access $50 billion in CHIPS Act funding?
congress.gov/bill/116th-con…
Also appears Secretary can consider how helpful the firm has been to US national security needs.
Each project is capped at $3 billion, but that can be waived if scale or security concerns surface.
Read 14 tweets
22 Jun
Today marks my five-year work anniversary @rooseveltinst.

US politics has shifted tremendously during that time. I can't think of a better place to watch this happen and pitch in.

Here was my very first RI post.
rooseveltinstitute.org/2016/06/22/glo…
I've been privileged to work alongside folks like @NellAbernathy @joelle_gamble @BharatRamamurti @jmargetta @KittyRichardsDC @ksabeelrahman @hitchop @MichaelSLinden @jennifermharris @awh and others that are now making change happen on the inside.
I'm also excited for all the great work we are continuing to put out on the outside, including from @FeliciaWongRI @SuzMKahn @stephsterlingdc @rgunns @rortybomb @kstrickland_ @lrmelodia and the whole RI team.
Read 5 tweets
20 May
Welcome to 21st century foreign investment protection policy. The left doesn't like tools like ISDS, but the beneficiaries of investment protection efforts will increasingly be green industries, which the left likes and wishes to be politically stronger.
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
To be clear, ISDS is not mentioned here. But we know from the last decade of ISDS cases in Europe that a lot of disputes are related to governments making clean energy schemes less generous to producers.
To be even more clear, I count myself as implicated in this particular uncomfortable tension.
Read 4 tweets
5 May
Further evidence that the constituency for trade policy is changing.
And USTR is changing.

Their first statement under Biden was on racial equity.
Their first annual trade policy report explicitly laid out their metric of success is not low prices, but high wages.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(