TIME TO TACKLE BRITISH EXCEPTIONALIST AND ABHORRENT ABLEIST RHETORIC

Increasingly it seems @educationgovuk , some paediatric professionals, some school leaders, most media journalists and even some parents spout the line that it’s okay for children to be infected because…
1. “Children mostly have a mild infection”

OR

2. “Very few children die”

OR

3. “Children who don’t return to pre-infection health swiftly have underlying conditions “
1. Hospital admissions with numbers of children admitted for covid are increasing. See @TigressEllie @jneill data
Look at the #Theysurvivedcovid hashtag

2. Have you seen what is happening in other countries? Are you dismissing and minimising the loss of children?
3. How many of the families that @LongCovidKids are supporting had children with any pre-existing health issues prior to a covid infection?
As a parent or member of school staff who thinks it’s acceptable to only look at mortality with regards to an infectious disease?

Is it justified to IGNORE morbidity?
Is it acceptable to dismiss any death or negative health impact that occurs in those children who do have conditions?

What kind of society is it that minimises the right to NOT have your future health protected?

Everyone deserves protecting from infection.
Adults can choose not to attend an indoor setting where they think H&S legislation has been breached and all risk hasn’t been identified or mitigated.

@educationgovuk are mandating attendance in just such a setting!
Stop it!
Stop the ableist rhetoric!
Stop the British Exceptionalist rhetoric!

PROTECT ALL

It’s not morally or legally acceptable to unnecessarily and knowingly expose anyone to increased risk of infection
Oops, clumsily worded…

What kind of society minimises the right to have your future health protected due to you being under 16?

That’s what we meant!
For further reference 👇 no one can guarantee how anyone’s body will react to infection. Therefore, applying the precautionary principle is the morally, legally and epidemiologically sensible strategy.
#mitigate
Almost half of those children hospitalised had no underlying health conditions 👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SafeEdForAll #Swarm🐝 #hivetosurvive #SafeEdForAll

SafeEdForAll #Swarm🐝 #hivetosurvive #SafeEdForAll Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SafeEdForAll_UK

11 Sep
SEEKING GUESTS FOR FUTURE SafeEdForAll SHOWS

- a social worker to discuss non-attendance referrals

- University students to discuss last year’s shambolic return and hopes for this year

- doctors to discuss infection control, symptoms an treatments (& long covid on children)
- @KateGreenSU and @peterkyle to discuss what the opposition have done to STOP children, school staff and their families being unnecessarily and knowingly exposed to increased risk of infection.

- @GavinWilliamson to defend the @educationgovuk guidance.
- @jeremycorbyn to chat bout how he envisaged returning to in-person education should have been managed

- @Zubhaque to discuss how disadvantaged groups in society have been disproportionately affected (and infected) in U.K. society
Read 5 tweets
8 Sep
“Today children, we’re going to talk about masks…”

No, just joking today we are going to discuss the use of a scientifically recognised mitigation against an airborne virus, like adults!
Let’s establish the important facts here;
1. Covid is airborne
2. Not everyone who has covid is aware that they have covid
3. People who are infected (including children) can transmit their infection to other people via the air they breathe
With infection rates in the UK being higher than they were in September 2020, being indoors in any setting with members of other households holds an increased risk of exposure to infection. 
Read 28 tweets
7 Sep
You may remember that on the 6th of August we wrote to a number of politicians who have responsibilities that include education.
Here’s our original letter;
Well today, a full month later, we have had ONE reply.

This one is from the DfE.

We’ll post each page of the response in the comments below, let us know what YOU think about this response.

Page 1 - mentions disruption but not unnecessary infections due to lack of mitigations
Page 2 - attendance mandatory, doesn’t mention the HT discretion that @NickGibbUK confirmed to @publiclawcentre last year
Read 16 tweets
6 Sep
IMPORTANT THREAD

Today we were made aware of the situation facing parents in Northern Ireland, here in England we’re aware of how the process regarding non-attendance during the pandemic has been but the situation for parents in Northern Ireland is very different.
Are you aware that Northern Ireland classes non-attendance as a safe-guarding issue and issues Section 47 procedures?

Withholding attendance of a child due to concerns about lack of safety measures is treated as child abuse.
A vulnerable family can expect education welfare officers, social services and the police to turn up on their doorstep and force attendance.

Parents who withhold attendance can be labelled as abusive.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(