Conservative internal polling as well as an Electoral Calculus survey has revealed the Tories stand to lose "in excess of 50 seats" to Labour under current polling.
This is an addition to a number of southern seats expected to drop to the LibDems at the next election.
This fits into what ive been saying for sometime:
LibDem top 20 target seats are virtually all Tory held with small margins
Labour focussing on the top 50 Tory held small marginal seats..
..can deliver quite efficiently a change in govt.
Again, as Ive said before,...the trick to using this is for Labour to concentrate on Tory held small margin seats...that Libdems cant win and..
...LibDems to focus on 20-40 Tory held small margin states where LibDems have the better chance than Labour.
Its not rocket science...
Next,
Dont be distracted by fools waffling on about "northern red wall seats" these people dont know what they're talking about.
The Midlands is the key area for Labour
20 Southern Remainer seats the key for LibDems
For those asking...
There'll be no party cooperation in Scotland.
It simply wont happen for a number of reasons, the main one being the SNP simply dont need one.
But for me Wales is the key 3rd area & coop btwn PC/LibDem/Lab could be vital, even the key, to getting Johnson out.
There's 2 ways Johnson will seek to fight back on this
1. Branding Starmer a left wing high tax Labour PM 2. Fighting a "patriotic" Brexit culture war
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gavin Williamson has informed staff at the Dept for Education that he’s leaving the department.
As part of his demotion he was offered Northern Ireland by Boris Johnson.
The most sensitive job in the most sensitive part of UK at its most sensitive time in its last 2 decades.
I should add this has not been officially confirmed yet - depends if Williamson wants to accept it.
In parliamentary lore “going to Northern Ireland” is not something that usually precedes a stellar rise to the high offices of state. It usually signals the end of a career.
Now hearing that Gavin Williamson turned down Northern Ireland job, which makes Johnson’s reshuffle a bit more complicated.
This could drag on about…perhaps even into tomorrow..
One of the worst debates is the climate change one.
It’s fought on risk/cost but regardless of how bad it turns out much of the cost of going carbon neutral is not really a cost drag but substituting out of resources that make people ill, deform environment & fund awful regimes.
In other words the idea that tackling climate change is a very high cost that’s either worth it or not (depending on your view) is not the whole story.
The benefits of a greener run world are huge even if current climate change projections turn out to be a bit alarmist.
Much of the fraught oil debate resembles people worried about what cutting down on smoking will do to the tobacco industry.
Both tobacco & oil are “deadweight industries” that add little in technological advances & money spent on them could be more productively spent elsewhere.
If you spend your day attacking Starmer because he’s not moving fast enough on Single Market as you’d like, while Johnson is
1. Passing a vote suppression law 2. Axing post Brexit environmental standards 3. Raising taxes on poor to pay for Brexit
Then you really need to WTFU.
The Labour Party is a pro Europe party with pro Europe members, activists, MPs & with most pro EU leader in my lifetime operating in one of the most difficult political contexts post war.
In 480 of the 650 seats it’s the only plausible challenger to the Tories.
Your choice.
The electoral calculus is simple.
There’s circa 20 southern remainerish Tory seats ready to drop to LibDems, the DUP are fading fast.
Labour need only to win back 30-35 seats from Tories.
& many of which usually vote Labour & need a swing of just 1-2%.
In my family theres a story about how my great grandfather’s brother wasn’t killed in WWI but “deserted & married a French girl” based on a single letter (now lost) from France.
Are such occurrences more common than we think…or more likely to just be gossipy old myths?
Growing up hearing these stories in late 1970s he was old enough to still be alive then.
I imagined hundreds of British soldiers living out there retirement in northern France still trying to hide their accent after 50 years.
Is there any proof that such things happened?
I was reminded of this again today by Dan Snow’s posting on deserting soldiers being shot.
If the choice is between trench war fire & being shot surely one would expect a number of soldiers to have evaded both - I’d love to know if there’s been any research done on this.