Checking up up on Stefan Lanka's silly project to "disprove all of virology", I found brief videos on an YouTube channel by "independent scientist" Igson Negrin, is a Lanka fan who has approached the CDC and Ulrike Kammerer by email with this request. 1/n youtube.com/channel/UCWN8-…
As you may recall, Lanka has claimed that all viruses are non-existent (including SARS-CoV-2), and that he can "prove" this by a simple "control experiment." Any genome can be assembled, he claims, from any set of genetic material. There's one issue. 2/n integralworld.net/visser203.html
Stefan Lanka has not yet done that simple experiment. Obviously, he lacks both the expertise and the laboratory access to perform it. And he argues, it wouldn't help if he would do that experiment, because he is an "outsider", who would not be believed from the start (true). 3/n
So Igson Negrin has now taken up the task to approach professional virologists and request them to do this "simple control experiment." Here's the email he has sent to the CDC and to Ulrike Kammerer (main author of the Corman-Drosten Review Report. 4/n. integralworld.net/visser194.html
Now, one can say much about this infamous team that tried to take down the Corman-Drosten PCR test protocol, but at least they believe in the existence of viruses and viral genomes. Well, most of their team members, some are true virus denialists. 5/n integralworld.net/visser199.html
But Kammerer is not that far into the rabbit hole, as is Stefan Lanka. Read here what Negrin writes to her on August 17th. "From one set of data collected for the assembly of one genome in virology it is possible to assemble all the genomes of all 'viruses' at the same time." 6/n
Negrin optimistically continues that it is very easy to perform this "quick and elegant control experiment" and that it will cost 0 Euro. He states that he expects a reply from her in one day, and will also let the world know if she did not or did not respond to him in time. 7/n
This is, of course, beyond any bounds of professionalism and sanity. Even if taken seriously, it would take some time and money for a lab employee to assemble any virus from any data, if that would be feasible at all. Of course it isn't. The burden of proof is fully on Lanka. 8/n
If Stefan Lanka would perform this "experiment" himself, and publish a decent paper about it, explaining his methodology, it would be ground-breaking. Soon, other scientists would flock together and try to replicate (or disprove) his results. That's the way science works. 9/n
But Stefan Lanka is just not up to this task, apparently. As I have explained before, on purely theoretical grounds his claim is baseless. It is like saying: you can write any book with the same alphabet! That is true, indeed, but trivial in the extreme. Books still exist. 10/n
To be honest, it would be a nice "control experiment" to try to falsify his claim - so that it is finally put to rest. It would also refute his extravagant claims about his own expertise in this field - considering that he is a virologist who no longer believes in viruses. 11/n
It would also be interesting to Ulrike Kammerer's response to this strange and rather rude request/threat from independent scientist Negrin. This is what was posted online by another Lanka-fan, who goes by the name "wartime", next to Negrin's email. 12/n
The same message has been sent by Negrin to world-class Dutch virologist @MarionKoopmans - who was part of the team that designed the first PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Will she do this simple control experiment which refutes all of virology and costs 0 Euro? You know the answer. :-)
It is fairly obvious from the above that Lanka, Negrin and company have no clue about how genome assembly actually works - and the same goes for their audience. It is not a matter of piecing nucleotides together until you have the genome, the genome emerges from the data. 14/n
It is like opening a book and reading a few sentences. Pretty soon you recognize what book you are reading. The fact that all books use the same alphabet is totally irrelevant. Claiming otherwise exposes one's ignorance. Stefan Lanka excels in spreading this utter nonsense. 15/n
On Telegram Igson Negrin claims that even Reiner Fuellmich is now seeing the "truth" that there is no virus at all, apparently after having interviewed a virus denialist. He urges Stefan Lanka to finally publish the results of his control experiment. 16/n t.me/igsonnegrin/301
As we have seen, Stefan Lanka himself is unable to do his own "control experiment", but at least he can share his protocol, so real scientists can execute them. Of course, this protocol will not work in practice, because genomics simply doesn't work in a piece-by-piece way. 17/n
So the real question is for Stefan Lanka to specify how he wants to run his "control experiment". Take all the As, Cs, Ts and Gs from a RNA extraction data set and build the genome of his liking? Or follow the protocols of science and let the data generate the true genomes? 18/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gisteren de uitzending van College Tour met de Belgische viroloog @vanranstmarc bekeken. Een van de thema's was: moeten we met wappies in debat gaan en ze daarmee een podium geven? Nee, zegt van Ranst, al kruist hij op Twitter wel eens de degens met hen. Een paar gedachten. 1/n
De belangrijkste reden om dat niet te doen, aldus Van Ranst, is dat het publiek dan al gauw zal denken dat de waarheid ergens in het midden ligt. Het doet een beetje denken aan de aarzeling bij veel biologen om met creationisten in debat te gaan - wetenschappelijk nutteloos. 2/n
Hij heeft ook niet de illusie dat de hard core wappies overtuigd zullen worden door herhaalde wetenschappelijke argumenten. Hoogsten kunnen twijfelaars overgehaald worden niet met hen in zee te gaan. Niet zonder reden noemde hij Willem Engel een "rattenvanger van Hamelen." 3/n
Op mijn vakantieadres in Moddergat, Noord-Oost Friesland, wat exemplaren opgepikt van De Andere Krant, het orgaan van de tegenstanders van de diverse coronamaatregelen. Ik denk dat ik hun logica nu wel doorheb. Je vindt die eindeloos herhaald bij @dancalegria, @bpoc2020 1/n
Die logica gaat min of meer als volgt: de rechtspraak is corrupt want die volgt slaafs de overheid. De overheid is corrupt want die volgt slaafs de wetenschap. De wetenschap is corrupt want die volgt slaafs Big Pharma. Big Pharma wil ons niet beter maken, maar manipuleren. 2/n
Vergelijk dat met de conventionele wijsheid. Het is alleen maar verstandig dat de rechtspraak verwijst naar de overheid, en de overheid naar de wetenschap, en dat de wetenschap weer Big Pharma inschakelt om snel miljoenen vaccins te kunnen produceren. Dat doe je niet even. 3/n
Virus denialist Andrew Kaufman recently released a new video on Bitchute called DR. ANDREW KAUFMAN ON THE FAKE DELTA VARIANT. He elaborates on the familiar metaphor of comparing the human genome to a book, with words, sentences and paragraphs. 1/n bitchute.com/video/zxOtsL63…
The analogy goes like this: genomes are compiled from millions of reads (words), tiny RNA fragments. These reads are combined into contigs (sentences, paragraphs), and these in turn are combined into a hypothetical whole book. His question: how do we know this book exists? 2/n
In his understanding, contrary to human genomes, viral genomes are completely computer generated, arbitrary and artificially constructed. Millions of words are put together to form sentences and paragraphs, though, without any example we don't know if that makes any sense. 3/n
Stefan Lanka recently claimed on Bitchute that he has done a "control experiment" which "is going to be the definitively experimental disproval of virology." You can find it yourself on that platform if you search for this title. It is a very spurious claim, as I will show. 1/n
His suggestion is that the so-called cytopathic effect (CPE) or cell damage usually said to prove the existence and impact of viruses is actually an artifact caused by the chemicals that are added to the viral cell cultures. Cell cultures without virus show the same damage. 2/n
The picture he shows in this short video displays damage done to healthy cells over 1 and 5 days, with different chemicals added to the mix (antibiotics, and various other substances). The same that are added to virus-infected cells. Ergo: there is no evidence for a virus. 3/n
In a fundraising webinar Andrew "no virus" Kaufman and Tom "no contagion" Cowan - who feature prominently in my book THE CORONA CONSPIRACY - presented their views on the pandemic to a group of true believers, and some fence-sitters. Meet the fringe of the fringe. 1/n
To give you some context: in the past year the public debate in the media on COVID-19 has been dominated by two voices. The dominant view sees SARS-CoV-2 as a dangerous virus that asks for drastic measures. A vocal minority view feels the virus is not that harmful after all. 2/n
Both camps, however, believe that there really is a virus to begin with. Enter the world of virus denialism, where the very existence of viruses is called into question. This eccentric view does not get much media coverage much to the chagrin of its main heroes and followers. 3/n