forcing someone to get vaccinated could quite literally *save their life or that of their friends and family.* it is just dishonest to class this with redlining or whatever
dishonest and also clumsily mistaken on the facts! that's the Evopsych Promise
even if we suppose that minorities had lower vaccination rates for whatever reason, there's a word for dishonest arguments against policies that would redress that imbalance
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Facebook "has built a system that has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules, according to company documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal." wsj.com/articles/faceb…
Mark Zuckerberg personally intervened to allow a Trump post calling for violence to remain up wsj.com/articles/faceb…
every day more convinced that the Xi Solution to social media is the right one. just get rid of it, all of it
oh for sure man. "Whether vaccine mandates are ok depends on if illness is easily transmitted" is a principle that hinges entirely on what level of government is implementing the mandate
substack contrarians pretending that pandemic controls are somehow a violation of civil rights is a new low even for them
even the most dog-brained glibertarians generally admit that the state can coerce people to prevent them from harming others. but that's too much from our freshly-minted McMegans
weeks ago these guys were pretending that an anti-vaccine crank was a legit expert being censored by a devious Big Tech/Big Pharma conspiracy theweek.com/politics/10046…
listen up blue checks: the guy who boosted ivermectin as a potential miracle cure based on the word of an antivaxxer fraud has a condescending lecture about media ethics
well now, let's be careful about our facts and #media#ethics. it was actually a pie filled with horse semen