Sure, but 1) public comments also go into the public record and can be impactful during any future litigation 2) We just don't have evidence that process comments are influential in the same way 3) Conceding pre-emptively is not a strategy I want to promote to anyone
Also even if you're happy with your district as it is now, population growth means districts will inevitably change this year, especially in the highest growth places (eg the Triangle.)
Wake and Mecklenburg are gaining two whole state House districts each! There's no guarantee that your district will stay the same so if you like it, you need to defend what you lik about it in a specific manner.
I know that people are uncomfortable with this. Making a geographically specific comment takes work and it can feel like a really big ask, and repeating a group you like's talking points about the process is much easier.
But I don't know what to say except that the limited evidence we have says geographically specific comments can work in a measurable way, and are relevant in the public record over the long term. I don't believe we can say the same for process comments.
I feel like my job is to help people participate in this process in the most effective way I know how. Most effective is unfortunately not easiest. All I can do is tell you what all evidence says is the best thing to do and provide the resources to help you do it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm seeing a lot of people at hearings ask for compact districts and equate this with fair districts. What I suspect they want is districts that don't split the cities, neighborhoods, and precincts they know.
But making a map compact could very well mean creating more splits.
Cities, which are probably the most relevant political division for most people, are by nature not compact - especially here in North Carolina where we do fun things like let them have discontiguous parts.
After walking fully around the building to find an open door (which was for some reason not the one in front of the actual entrance to the auditorium) I'm here at Nash County Community College for tonight's Joint Redistricting Committee public hearing!
I believe I saw Rep. Linda Cooper-Suggs in the parking lot but I don't see any legislators in the room as of yet.
I'm not asking anyone to get on complex software and draw a district that complies with a huge list of non-partisan redistricting criteria! I'm just asking people to talk about their communities and needs in a way that's specific.
If you say something like "Greensboro, Winston-Salem, and High Point share industry, educational and cultural institutions, and have similar concerns as urban areas that are different from the surrounding rural areas, and therefore should be in the same Congressional district."
Y'all one thing I have to say - I am concerned that people are not making effective comments at public hearings - that they're making comments that can be easily ignored by the redistricting committee.
If you show up and talk about wanting an independent commission, or say you want fair maps without saying what that means in a very granular and specific way you are giving the committee license to ignore you.
The response from the legislators running the committee to those kinds of comments are basically going to be 1) we don't have an independent commission, so too bad, we're drawing the maps 2) we think the maps we're drawing *are* "fair"