I'm not asking anyone to get on complex software and draw a district that complies with a huge list of non-partisan redistricting criteria! I'm just asking people to talk about their communities and needs in a way that's specific.
If you say something like "Greensboro, Winston-Salem, and High Point share industry, educational and cultural institutions, and have similar concerns as urban areas that are different from the surrounding rural areas, and therefore should be in the same Congressional district."
Guess what!? That's the kind of feasibily mappable comment I'm talking about.
Or if you say "my community consists of x, y, & z neighborhoods between roads A and B. Most people here work at the local hospital and their children attend C school, so we share similar concerns about healthcare and education funding. We should all be in the same House district"
That's also a feasibily mappable comment!
I'm asking you to do something a little harder than repeating someone else's talking points, but that's only because you have to sit down and think about things that are already a huge part of your daily life, and find a way to talk about them with specificity.
Again, I don't want to underestimate the difficulty of this, but I genuinely believe that most people have a local community that is meaningful to them and that they want to be fairly represented by remaining whole in a single district.
Whether your community is your local neighborhood, a few small cities (looking at you, Southern Pines, Pinehurst, and Aberdeen), the counties that you feel make up your region - these are all valid and important to advocate for in the redistricting process.
Again, I would love to see anyone who finds this daunting at one of our trainings. We will do our very best to walk you through writing this kind of comment and answer all of your questions.
The excellent @bribrough has even been working with people 1:1 to help them draft their comments.
We genuinely want to do everything we can to help make sure you use the opportunity to comment on redistricting in a way that is most likely to actually get us fairer maps in NC.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm seeing a lot of people at hearings ask for compact districts and equate this with fair districts. What I suspect they want is districts that don't split the cities, neighborhoods, and precincts they know.
But making a map compact could very well mean creating more splits.
Cities, which are probably the most relevant political division for most people, are by nature not compact - especially here in North Carolina where we do fun things like let them have discontiguous parts.
After walking fully around the building to find an open door (which was for some reason not the one in front of the actual entrance to the auditorium) I'm here at Nash County Community College for tonight's Joint Redistricting Committee public hearing!
I believe I saw Rep. Linda Cooper-Suggs in the parking lot but I don't see any legislators in the room as of yet.
Sure, but 1) public comments also go into the public record and can be impactful during any future litigation 2) We just don't have evidence that process comments are influential in the same way 3) Conceding pre-emptively is not a strategy I want to promote to anyone
Also even if you're happy with your district as it is now, population growth means districts will inevitably change this year, especially in the highest growth places (eg the Triangle.)
Wake and Mecklenburg are gaining two whole state House districts each! There's no guarantee that your district will stay the same so if you like it, you need to defend what you lik about it in a specific manner.
Y'all one thing I have to say - I am concerned that people are not making effective comments at public hearings - that they're making comments that can be easily ignored by the redistricting committee.
If you show up and talk about wanting an independent commission, or say you want fair maps without saying what that means in a very granular and specific way you are giving the committee license to ignore you.
The response from the legislators running the committee to those kinds of comments are basically going to be 1) we don't have an independent commission, so too bad, we're drawing the maps 2) we think the maps we're drawing *are* "fair"